Endoscopy Immersion Study.

Understanding the Impact of Endoscopy Immersion Training in Regional Endoscopy Academies: is it Value for Money?

Endoscopy services are under significant pressure and endoscopy training academies and immersion training are under review at a national level. To date, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of the different approaches to immersion training or a large-scale study looking at its impact on trainees and/or endoscopy services. The purpose of this study is to perform a process, impact and economic evaluation of current immersion training practices to determine if they are impactful and value for money.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Retrospective quantitative analysis involves endoscopists (training between January 2022 and the study start date) who may (or may not) have undertaken immersion training. Prospectively analysis will be performed to evaluate the impact of immersion training.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Gloucestershire
      • Gloucester, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, GL1 3NN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Endoscopy trainees

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Endoscopy trainees (Surgical, Gastroenterology or CE) who have received (or are soon to undertake) immersion training in either gastroscopy or colonoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Endoscopy trainees who have received (or are soon to undertake immersion training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of improvement in DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) score during immersion training compared to base hospital training
Time Frame: 6 months from start of data collection
Rate of change in DOPS supervision assessment overall score - % of ratings competent for independent practice. Case matched interrupted time series analysis immersion trainees versus non-immersion trainees.
6 months from start of data collection
Caecal intubation rate (CIR)/ duodenal (D2) intubation rate improvement during immersion training compared to base hospital training?
Time Frame: 6 months from start of data collection
% of procedures where trainee endoscopist advances the whole length of the colon to the caecum / successful intubation of the second part of the duodenum (D2) without assistance. Case matched interrupted time series analysis immersion trainees versus non-immersion trainees.
6 months from start of data collection
Improvement in time, and number of procedures, required for certification during immersion training compared to base hospital training?
Time Frame: 6 months from start of data collection
Number of days between starting training and achieving certification (allowing for breaks in training e.g. parental leave) and number of procedures performed between starting training and achieving full certification. Case matched interrupted time series analysis immersion trainees versus non-immersion trainees.
6 months from start of data collection
Increase in number of endoscopies performed independently post certification following immersion training compared to base hospital training?
Time Frame: 6 months from start of data collection
Number of endoscopies performed independently 3 months / 6 months/ 12 months post-certification. Case matched interrupted time series analysis immersion trainees versus non-immersion trainees.
6 months from start of data collection
Improvement in confidence scores following immersion training.
Time Frame: 6 months from start of data collection
Do trainees feel more confident following immersion training? Survey and/or in-depth interviews with immersion trainees.
6 months from start of data collection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24/108/GHT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Training

Subscribe