Effect of Hypnosis and Virtual Reality on Anxiety During Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (HYPNO-RV LAM)

January 26, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Effect of Medical Hypnosis Compared to Virtual Reality or Standard Care on Anxiety During Induction Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This is a pilot study comparing 3 arms (standard care with hypnosis / standard care with virtual reality / standard care alone), aimed at measuring the effect on anxiety during the induction treatment. Acute myeloid leukemia is considered an oncological emergency that requires chemotherapy treatment with a high risk of serious adverse effects due to prolonged bone marrow failure or drug toxicity. This situation is very stressful for patients, who must cope with the initial symptoms, the diagnosis of a serious cancer, an urgent hospitalization (sometimes in intensive care) and prolonged hospitalization, invasive procedures for diagnosis and initiation of treatment, and intensive chemotherapy requiring protective isolation to contain the risk of life-threatening infection. Added to this care context is the breakdown of family ties as well as socio-professional ties, generating major anxiety and a risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (symptoms, which are common in acute myeloid leukemia. The hypothesis of our study is that hypnosis and virtual reality sessions combined with standard care could reduce anxiety and enhance chemotherapy treatment in acute myeloid leukemia patients when they first learn of their diagnosis.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three arms. All patients will receive standard conventional chemotherapy treatments in accordance with international recommendations and standard conventional care (including supportive care) during their hospital stay. Depending on the group to which they are assigned, they will also participate in hypnotherapy or virtual reality sessions during their hospital stay. Patients will be asked to complete various self-administered questionnaires to measure their levels of anxiety, quality of life, and stress during the course of treatment, according to the study schedule

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

99

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over the age of 18
  • Patient diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia in Western Occitanie
  • Eligible for first-line induction chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine
  • Patient able to understand and respond to a self-administered questionnaire
  • Affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security system
  • Having signed the research consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia 3
  • Patients who were treated in intensive care prior to hospitalization for induction therapy or following induction therapy
  • Patients with a diagnosed chronic pain-inducing disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis), if not stable
  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of psychopathology such as psychosis, depression, or burnout, if not stable
  • Patients suffering from epilepsy, whether treated or not, or with a history of epilepsy
  • Patients under guardianship, conservatorship, or legal protection
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypnose
Patients participate in six hypnosis sessions, each lasting 30 minutes, twice during the first and second weeks, then once a week for the following two weeks
Each session is based on the hypnosis techniques described by Erickson. In general, a session includes a hypnotic induction phase, a period of deepening and suggestions specific to the symptoms, followed by a return to reality. The hypnotherapist will be someone outside the team, trained in the Ericksonian method, who will intervene at a specific time during the sessions.
Experimental: Virtual Reality
Patients participate in nine virtual reality sessions, each lasting 20 minutes, three times during the first week, then twice a week for the following three weeks
Each patient will be able to choose their environment from among those available (forest, beach, Zen garden, scuba diving, winter landscape, northern lights, astral travel, Antarctica, Maldives, desert), accompanied by ambient sounds. During the sessions, patients will be seated in their rooms at a quiet time outside of any treatment.
No Intervention: Control
Patients do not receive hypnosis sessions or virtual reality sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality on the anxiety levels of patients at the end of induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis
Time Frame: 35 days
Change in anxiety score, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
35 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on nociceptive pain
Time Frame: 35 days
Pain will be measured using a numerical pain scale at inclusion (first day of hospitalization)
35 days
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on anxiety
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in anxiety scores using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
3 months
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
Quality of life scores using the specific Fact-Leu questionnary
3 months
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on post-traumatic stress disorder
Time Frame: 3 months
Post-traumatic stress disorder using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale
3 months
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on remission rate
Time Frame: 35 days
Remission rate by sternal puncture, performed systematically (as part of routine care). A blast count of less than 5% will indicate remission
35 days
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on minimal residual disease
Time Frame: 35 days
Minimal Residual Disease, using molecular biology or flow cytometry
35 days
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on consumption of analgesics and psychotropic drugs
Time Frame: 35 days
Medication consumption based on cumulative doses and the number of days on analgesics and psychotropic drugs
35 days
Evaluate the effect of an intervention combining standard care and virtual reality, compared to standard care and standard care with hypnosis, on occurrence of adverse events related to induction treatment
Time Frame: 35 days
Adverse events related to induction treatment of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3, as well as adverse events related to induction treatment such as nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, weight loss, and alopecia, regardless of grade
35 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzanne TAVITIAN, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Hypnosis

Subscribe