Application of Multimodal MRI-based Radiomics in Histological Grading and Prognostic Assessment of Breast Cancer

February 4, 2026 updated by: Hao Xu

In addition to TNM staging, the current management of breast cancer is based on conventional pathological features that categorize the disease into three molecular subtypes, each with significant prognostic implications in clinical practice: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, luminal (hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative), and triple-negative breast cancers. The overexpression or amplification of HER2 is observed in 10-15% of breast cancer cases. This phenomenon often correlates with a more aggressive tumor behavior while also demonstrating an increased responsiveness to HER2-targeted therapies. However, the use of highly effective anti-HER2 drugs can significantly enhance the survival outcomes of these patients. Additionally, the expression status of HER2 is critical in determining the necessity for targeted therapy. Therefore, preoperative assessment of HER2 expression status has important therapeutic implications. Currently, clinical methods for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer before surgery include immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) measurements performed on core-needle biopsy specimens. However, these biopsy sampling techniques have inherent limitations, including sampling bias and an inability to fully represent intratumor heterogeneity. Additionally, the biopsy procedure can be uncomfortable and carries certain risks for patients. Tumour heterogeneity generally refers to the variations in angiogenesis, metabolism, gene expression, and other biological characteristics among tumors. Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) can manifest as signal differences in radiological images at the macro level. Investigators hypothesized that significant differences in biological characteristics and behavior exist between HER2-positive (HER2+) and HER2-negative (HER2 -) breast cancers, allowing for the distinction of these two types of tumours by identifying specific imaging features that reflect ITH.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is an effective imaging modality that provides temporal information regarding the dynamics of contrast agents in suspicious lesions while maintaining acceptable spatial resolution. It is particularly sensitive in detecting breast cancer lesions, especially those in dense breast tissue. DCE-MRI can indirectly reflect abnormal tumor vascular proliferation through the hemodynamic characteristics of the lesions. Radiomics is an emerging technology that involves extracting quantitative and reproducible features from medical images using high-throughput, sophisticated modalities that are often challenging to identify or quantify visually. These features, which may be linked to specific diseases, are analyzed using statistical or machine learning (ML) algorithms to create predictive models for tumor diagnosis, grading, efficacy evaluation, and prognosis prediction. ML has two important advantages over traditional statistical models. The goal is to reduce decision time during diagnosis and generally achieve greater diagnostic accuracy. As demonstrated in breast cancer diagnosis, ML can significantly improve cancer risk prediction by identifying complex patterns in large amounts of clinical data. Despite the great potential of ML, it still faces several obstacles in its clinical application. A major challenge is a lack of interpretability-many ML models operate like "black boxes", making it difficult for clinicians to understand and trust their decision-making processes. Furthermore, the performance of the model depends heavily on the quality and representativeness of the training data. ML methods often require larger data sets than traditional clinical studies.

Thus, this study aimed to develop a radiomics-based ML model that could predict the HER2 status of breast cancers in a non-invasive manner using DCE-MRI images. Additionally, the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) algorithm was employed to analyze the contribution of the variables included in the model, providing valuable insights for formulating more accurate preoperative treatment plans for patients with breast cancers.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

368 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer from three hospitals between August 2017 and December 2021 were consecutively recruited in this study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathological diagnosis of breast cancer by surgical or biopsy pathology;
  • Availability of DCE-MRI within two weeks before surgery
  • No prior treatment before baseline DCE-MRI examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 5 mm of long diameter of the lesion
  • Severe motion artifacts
  • Missing or incomplete essential data
  • Anti-tumor treatment before MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Breast Cancer
Patients at Hospital 1 underwent DCE-MRI using a 16-channel breast coil on a 3.0-T MRI scanner (Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) for the training and internal validation set. The external validation set comprised patients from Hospital 2 (GE Signa HDxt, equipped with a dedicated 7-channel phased-array breast coil) and Hospital 3 (Ingenia, Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, also featuring a dedicated 7-channel phased-array breast coil)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer who underwent DCE-MRI were included. Radiomic features were extracted, and seven machine learning algorithms were utilized to construct predictive model.The AUC served as the evaluation metric
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
The AUC served as the primary evaluation metric for identifying the optimal model. A comprehensive model evaluation was conducted, which included AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
F1 score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
F1 score, with validation on an independent cohort.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
histopathological diagnosis of breast cancer by surgical or biopsy pathology
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To investigate the correlation between biological and radiomics features, we compared the diferences in radiomics features selected by SHAP between diferent Ki67 index and hormone receptor status
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SCCSMC-01-2024-119

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on DCE-MRI

Subscribe