Prospective Evaluation of a Locked Risk-Stratified Surveillance Strategy for Extrahepatic Metastasis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

May 29, 2026 updated by: Chen Xiaoping, Tongji Hospital
This is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study in adults with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without baseline extrahepatic metastasis who are receiving routine clinical management and follow-up at participating centers. The study evaluates the real-world implementation and clinical utility of a locked machine learning-guided risk stratification strategy for predicting lung and bone metastasis and supporting risk-stratified surveillance. The locked strategy uses prespecified 12-month risk thresholds and linked care pathways and is implemented without retraining or threshold revision. No study-mandated treatment or surveillance assignment is performed; clinical care remains at physician discretion according to local practice. The study assesses model transportability and calibration, implementation outcomes (including completion of prespecified actions, timeliness of action, and treatment activation), clinically actionable detection outcomes, patient-important outcomes, and longer-term survival. Comparative analyses use centre- and calendar-epoch-aligned usual-care episodes as the primary observational comparator.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a substantial risk of postoperative or post-treatment recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis, which may affect prognosis and management opportunities. Early identification of patients at increased risk of extrahepatic metastasis may support more appropriate surveillance intensity, earlier multidisciplinary review, and more timely treatment planning.

Study Objectives: This study prospectively evaluates the real-world transportability, calibration, implementation characteristics, and clinical utility of a previously developed and locked machine learning-guided risk stratification strategy for extrahepatic metastasis in HCC, with a focus on lung and bone metastasis.

Study Design: This is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study conducted in routine clinical practice. Participants are enrolled and followed without randomization or study-mandated treatment allocation. The locked strategy includes endpoint-specific lung and bone metastasis risk modules, fixed 12-month risk thresholds, and linked risk-stratified surveillance recommendations. The prospective program includes staged real-world implementation, including an independent new-centre replication phase using the unchanged locked package.

Study Population: Adults with HCC without baseline extrahepatic metastasis at the first eligible risk assessment who are receiving routine care at participating centers.

Study Procedures and Data Collection: Baseline demographics, liver disease etiology, tumor burden and stage, liver reserve and performance status, biomarkers, imaging, treatment intent, follow-up imaging, occurrence and timing of extrahepatic metastasis, downstream management, implementation metrics, and clinical outcomes are collected prospectively from routine care records and study documentation.

Outcomes and Analytic Framework: The study evaluates incident extrahepatic metastasis, overall survival, and prespecified implementation and clinical utility outcomes, including completion of prespecified action, time to action, treatment activation, clinically actionable detection, symptom-driven detection, acute deterioration, and resource-related outcomes where available. Comparative implementation analyses use aligned usual-care episodes from the same centers and prespecified calendar epochs as the primary observational comparator. Any strategy-emulation or comparative-effectiveness analyses will be reported as observational estimates and will not be interpreted as randomized treatment effects.

Registry and timing statement (transparency & status): This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07444905) in February 2026, after study initiation. At the time of registration participant enrollment had ended and long-term follow-up for secondary endpoints remained ongoing. Primary outcome data collection is anticipated to be completed by 2026-12-30 and full study completion is anticipated by 2026-12-31. Overall Recruitment Status on the registry is recorded as Active, not recruiting. The timing of registration reflects administrative and multi-centre onboarding/IT coordination delays.

Background and rationale: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a substantial risk of postoperative or post-treatment recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis, which may affect prognosis and management opportunities. Early identification of patients at increased risk of extrahepatic metastasis may support more appropriate surveillance intensity, earlier multidisciplinary review, and more timely treatment planning.

Study objectives and design: This multicentre prospective observational cohort study evaluates the real-world transportability, calibration, implementation characteristics, and clinical utility of a previously developed and locked machine-learning guided risk-stratification strategy for extrahepatic metastasis in HCC (lung and bone modules). Participants are enrolled and followed in routine care without randomization or study-mandated treatment allocation. The locked strategy comprises endpoint-specific risk modules, fixed 12-month risk thresholds, and linked risk-stratified surveillance recommendations. The prospective programme includes staged real-world implementation and a prespecified independent new-centre replication phase that reused the unchanged locked package.

Governance and freeze evidence: Crucially, key governance objects (protocol v1.0, prespecified thresholds, SOP, statistical analysis plan, and code release tagged v1.0) were archived and time-stamped prior to the first live implementation. To enable independent verification, the following archived objects and logs are provided in the Supplementary Materials: NCT07444905_Study_Protocol;NCT07444905_Model_Lock_and_Version_Governance_Note;NCT07444905_Statistical_Analysis_Plan;NCT07444905_Endpoint_Definitions_and_Adjudication_Charter.

Wave-2 replication and auditability: Wave 2 was a prespecified independent new-centre prospective replication performed in different health systems and with different governance and deployment teams; it reused the unchanged locked package (v1.0) without retraining, recalibration, threshold revision, or SOP remapping. Supplementary materials include activation logs and time-stamped governance evidence documenting unchanged package use, and an independent recomputation/audit summary demonstrating that the analysis plan and codebase were fixed prior to implementation.

Outcomes and analytic framework: The study prospectively collects baseline demographics, liver disease etiology, tumor burden and stage, liver reserve and performance status, biomarkers, imaging, treatment intent, follow-up imaging, occurrence and timing of extrahepatic metastasis, downstream management, implementation metrics, and clinical outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, implementation metrics, and the prespecified analytic approach are described in the protocol and SAP (see Supplementary Materials).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1523

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis at baseline who are receiving standard-of-care management and undergoing prospective follow-up in routine clinical practice. Participants are enrolled in a prospective observational cohort to evaluate a machine learning-based risk assessment strategy for predicting extrahepatic metastasis and supporting risk-adapted surveillance.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) confirmed by histopathology or accepted radiologic criteria per international guidelines.
  • No evidence of extrahepatic metastasis at baseline evaluation.
  • Receiving standard-of-care management with planned longitudinal follow-up in routine clinical practice.
  • Availability of baseline clinical and imaging data required for risk assessment using the pre-specified machine learning model.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent, or inclusion under ethics committee-approved procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed extrahepatic metastasis at enrollment (baseline).
  • History of other active malignancy within the past 5 years, except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma.
  • Incomplete baseline clinical information that precludes model-based risk assessment.
  • Expected survival < 3 months due to severe comorbidities.
  • Participation in an interventional clinical trial that may substantially alter follow-up strategy or metastasis assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Prospective Observational Cohort
Adults with hepatocellular carcinoma without baseline extrahepatic metastasis enrolled in a prospective observational cohort to evaluate a locked machine learning-guided risk stratification strategy for predicting lung and bone metastasis and supporting risk-stratified surveillance in routine practice. No experimental interventions are assigned, and clinical management remains at physician discretion.
Point-of-care use of a locked machine learning-guided risk assessment tool with fixed thresholds and linked risk-stratified surveillance recommendations; no study-mandated treatment assignment is performed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion of a Prespecified Pathway-Concordant Action Within 60 Days
Time Frame: Day 0 to day 60 after the eligible index assessment.
Proportion of eligible index episodes with completion of at least one prespecified pathway-concordant action within 60 days after the eligible index assessment. A pathway-concordant action was defined as SOP-concordant multidisciplinary team review, escalated lung- or bone-metastasis-directed imaging, or referral.
Day 0 to day 60 after the eligible index assessment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Time from baseline (enrollment) to death from any cause; censored at last known alive date.
Up to 36 months
Completion of a Prespecified Action Within 60 Days
Time Frame: Completion of the prespecified risk-stratified surveillance or management action within 60 days after the first eligible locked risk assessment.
Completion of the prespecified risk-stratified surveillance or management action within 60 days after the first eligible locked risk assessment.
Completion of the prespecified risk-stratified surveillance or management action within 60 days after the first eligible locked risk assessment.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incident Extrahepatic Metastasis
Time Frame: Up to 36 months after the eligible index assessment.
First new extrahepatic metastatic disease confirmed after baseline by imaging and/or histopathology. This disease-event endpoint was used for event ascertainment, competing-risk classification, descriptive clinical context, and model-evaluation context.
Up to 36 months after the eligible index assessment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zhao Huang, Tongji Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Machine Learning

Clinical Trials on Machine Learning-Based Risk Assessment

Subscribe