OCT-based Machine Learning FFR for Predicting Post-PCI FFR

March 26, 2024 updated by: Jung-Sun Kim, Yonsei University

Optical Coherence Tomography-based Machine Learning for Predicting Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Artery Stenting

This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) model derived by machine learning based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) exam after coronary artery stent implantation with the wire-based FFR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

FFR and OCT exam are used for different purposes during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The FFR is a decision-making tool to determine if additional procedures are necessary, while the OCT exam is used to optimize the stent procedure. The use of both tests provides additional information to help perform a excellent procedure, but it is more expensive and time-consuming.

Therefore, an OCT-derived machine learning FFR test may be helpful. Previous studies have demonstrated that OCT-based machine learning FFR before the procedure has shown good diagnostic performance in predicting FFR, irrespective of the coronary territory.

Despite the rapid development of technologies and tools for PCI, a significant number of patients experienced adverse events, such as recurrence of angina and silent ischemia despite angiographically successful PCI. Suboptimal PCI is a well-known independent prognostic factor for major cardiovascular accidents. Therefore, measuring post-PCI FFR immediately after stent implantation is crucial to optimize the procedure outcome and improve the patient's prognosis. Although the importance of measuring post-PCI FFR is gradually emerging, there is currently no model for OCT-based machine learning FFR that predicts FFR after stent insertion. In patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using stents for ischemic heart disease, we will compare the diagnostic accuracy of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) model derived by machine learning based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) exam after coronary artery stent implantation with the wire-based FFR.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

82

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Among patients who underwent PCI for ischemic heart disease, those who underwent both OCT examination and pressure wire-based FFR after coronary artery stenting.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who underwent stent implantation for ischemic heart disease
  2. Patients who underwent both OCT examination and FFR using a pressure wire after PCI

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Poor OCT imaging quality
  2. Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (<30%)
  3. Patients with severe valvular heart disease
  4. Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of OCT-based machine learning FFR compared to wire-based FFR
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Determining the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values obtained by the new method compared with invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of OCT-based machine learning FFR compared to wire-based FFR
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
4 weeks
Diagnostic performance of OCT-based machine learning FFR according to the coronary artery (LAD, LCx or RCA) compared to wire-based FFR
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jung-Sun Kim, MD, PhD, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OCT-FFR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tomography, Optical Coherence

Clinical Trials on OCT-based machine learning FFR

Subscribe