FANS vs CVAC for Medium to Large Stones

March 31, 2026 updated by: Matthew Lee, Ohio State University

Randomized Controlled Trial of Flexible and Navigable Suction (FANS) vs. CVAC Suction Ureteroscope for Medium to Large Stones

Improvements in ureteroscopes have led to improved stone free rates. Two new devices (FANS - Flexible and Navigable Suction) and the CVAC ureteroscope have never been compared head to head. This trial will compare these two new suction ureteroscope technologies against each other

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ureteroscopy (URS) is recommended by the American Urological Association for surgical treatment of kidney stones < 2 cm in linear dimension. Although historically shock wave lithotripsy was the most common surgical treatment, since 2013 ureteroscopy has become the most common surgical treatment for kidney stones. There have been great advancements to ureteroscopic technology with improvements in laser technology leading to more efficient and complete stone ablation/ fragmentation. However, stone free rates were still suboptimal, with some series reporting stone free rates of 55% after URS. However, in the last couple of years the introduction of suction technology, specifically Flexible and Navigable Suction (FANS) sheaths and the CVAC scope by Calyxo have changed the paradigm of kidney stone treatment. CVAC is essentially a larger ureteroscope with a large 7F working channel that allows for aspiration of stone fragments created during laser lithotripsy. A standard ureteroscope has a working channel of only 3.6 F so fragments cannot be aspirated through this. These new suction technologies allow the surgeon to actively remove stone fragments, thereby increasing the immediate and long-term stone free rate, instead of waiting for fragments to pass after the surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

159

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Nephrolithiasis
  • Total linear stone diameter 8-20 mm in size

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe medical comorbidities causing inability to undergo general anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: FANS
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteroscopy
ureteroscopy will be performed with flexible and navigable suction sheaths
Active Comparator: CVAC
CVAC suction ureteroscopy arm
CVAC suction ureteroscopy will be used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stone free rate
Time Frame: up to six weeks
Journal of Endourology definitions using CT evidence
up to six weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Lee, MD, Ohio State University
  • Principal Investigator: Bodo Knudsen, MD, Ohio State University
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Sourial, MD, Ohio State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD will be shared with investigators upon written request and execution of a data use agreement with the Ohio State University

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

any investigators who provide written request and complete a data use agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on ureteroscopy

Subscribe