UPURS Trial for Patient-centered Management of Symptomatic Obstructing Stones (UPURS)

January 15, 2025 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Upfront vs Postponed Ureteroscopy (UPURS) Trial for Patient-centered Management of Symptomatic Obstructing Stones

A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial studying the management of symptomatic ureteral stones. This study will compare upfront ureteroscopy vs observation and delayed intervention for patients presenting to the emergency department with a symptomatic ureteral stone.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Management of symptomatic ureteral stones is variable across the United States due to a lack of clear, patient-centered guidelines. For patients who do not meet criteria for emergent stenting, the decision to recommend upfront definitive treatment (ureteroscopy, ESWL) or medical expulsion therapy is influenced by factors such as practice setting, insurance status, and day of the week. This has resulted in health disparities and delays in care that disproportionately affect vulnerable patient populations.

For patients presenting to the emergency department with a symptomatic ureteral stone investigators will randomize into Group A: Upfront Ureteroscopy or Group B: Delayed intervention and observation. Both arms are considered standard of care for patients presenting with the above diagnosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting to the Emergency Department (ED)
  • Adult (> 18 yo)
  • ≥5mm ureteral stone diagnosed on CT scan
  • Presence of symptoms (pain, nausea, vomiting, hematuria)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Strict indication for stent
  • Stone burden not amenable to Ureteroscopy (URS)
  • Dirty urine analysis (UA) or positive urine culture (UCx)
  • Transplant kidney
  • Presence of conduit
  • Comorbidities not optimized for surgery
  • Strong preference for surgery or observation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A (Upfront ureteroscopy)
Upfront ureteroscopy
No Intervention: Group B (Observation/delayed ureteroscopy)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: 3 months
Measure on a scale of 1-10, with zero indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain.
3 months
Anxiety Score
Time Frame: 3 months
Measure on a scale of 1-10, the score ranges from 0-10, with zero indicating no anxiety and 10 indicating the worst anxiety.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital visit length
Time Frame: 3 months
Measured in number of days
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days of work lost
Time Frame: 3 months
Measured in number of days
3 months
Hospital visits
Time Frame: 3 months
Measure in number of times
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Chi, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ureteral Stone

Clinical Trials on Ureteroscopy

Subscribe