Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation Combined With Oocyte Cryopreservation Versus Oocyte Cryopreservation Alone

Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation Combined With Oocyte Cryopreservation Versus Oocyte Cryopreservation Alone: an Observational Study in Oncology Patients

Fertility preservation is a crucial aspect of care for oncological patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery, which can significantly reduce ovarian reserve and cause infertility or premature menopause. Among available techniques, oocyte cryopreservation is well-established with high survival rates but requires controlled ovarian stimulation and may not be suitable for prepubertal patients or those needing urgent cancer therapy. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation offers advantages by preserving a larger number of primordial follicles, can be performed anytime in the menstrual cycle regardless of age, and also helps restore ovarian endocrine function.

Combining ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by oocyte cryopreservation may maximize fertility preservation by safeguarding more follicles and ensuring availability of mature oocytes.

This study will collect data from two patient groups:

Group 1: patients undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by oocyte cryopreservation (combined treatment)

Group 2: patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation alone.

Group assignment is based on planned gonadotoxic therapy and available time before treatment initiation, according to clinical practice.

The study aims to compare the number of oocytes retrieved per ovarian stimulation cycle between the two groups, along with the oocyte retrieval rate (number of oocytes retrieved/number of aspirated follicles), number of mature oocytes (metaphase II), incidence of moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome within 7 days post-retrieval, and correlations between serum estradiol and luteinizing hormone levels on trigger day and oocyte yield.

Approximately 127 patients aged 18 to 46 will be consecutively enrolled at the UO Gynecology and Human Reproduction Pathophysiology, IRCCS AOUBO Policlinico di Sant'Orsola. This is a cross-sectional, single-center, observational study with both retrospective and prospective enrollment. The retrospective period considered is from January 1, 2022, to the study start date. The study duration is 4 years and 3 months.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

127

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Bologna
      • Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with oncological disease attending the UO Gynecology and Human Reproduction Pathophysiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di S. Orsola, for fertility preservation through ovarian tissue cryopreservation and/or oocyte cryopreservation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with oncological disease eligible for potentially gonadotoxic therapy
  • BMI ≥ 17.5 kg/m² and ≤ 32 kg/m²
  • Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 46 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to one or more of the active substances used during ovarian stimulation treatment
  • Positive for HBV, HCV, HIV, or Treponema pallidum
  • Lack of oncological clearance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the number of oocytes retrieved per stimulation cycle in oncology patients undergoing fertility preservation before gonadotoxic therapy: ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by oocyte cryopreservation vs. oocyte cryopreservation alone
Time Frame: 2 hours after oocyte retrieval
Count of oocytes retrieved
2 hours after oocyte retrieval

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the oocyte retrieval rate (number of oocytes retrieved / number of aspirated follicles) between the two previously described patient groups.
Time Frame: 2 hours after oocyte retrieval
Number of oocytes retrieved / number of aspirated follicles
2 hours after oocyte retrieval
To compare the number of mature oocytes retrieved (defined as the number of metaphase II oocytes) between the two groups.
Time Frame: 2 hours after oocyte retrieval
Count of retrieved metaphase II oocytes
2 hours after oocyte retrieval
To compare the number of patients who develop moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (defined by presence of ascites, maximum ovarian diameter ≥ 8 cm, hematocrit ≥ 45%, symptoms such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension, or dyspne
Time Frame: Within 7 days after oocyte retrieval.
Number of patients presenting with moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (defined by the presence of ascites, maximum ovarian diameter ≥ 8 cm, hematocrit ≥ 45%, symptoms including abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and dyspnea)
Within 7 days after oocyte retrieval.
To assess whether increasing serum levels of estradiol (E2) (pg/mL) and luteinizing hormone (LH), measured on the day of ovulation trigger, correspond to a higher number of oocytes retrieved in the two previously described patient groups.
Time Frame: 2 hours after oocyte retrieval]
Estradiol (E2) measured in pg/mL / number of oocytes retrieved
2 hours after oocyte retrieval]
To compare the number of patients who develop hemoperitoneum and/or pelvic infections between the two groups.
Time Frame: Within 7 days after oocyte retrieval
Development of hemoperitoneum and/or pelvic infections
Within 7 days after oocyte retrieval

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COMBINGLE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe