Tooth-borne Interdental Distraction Osteogenesis Along Arch Curvature for Wide Alveolar Clefts Reduction (IDO)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Ain Shams University

A New Device for Interdental Distraction Osteogenesis for Management of Wide Alveolar Clefts

This clinical study provided a modified simple and small appliance for reduction of wide alveolar clefts in cleft lip and palate patients, making the grafting procedure of better prognosis and increase its success rate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Along the journey of treatment of cleft patients, secondary autogenous alveolar bone grafting is the technique basically used for cleft alveolus and palate repair during mixed dentition stage, in order to create bone support for teeth adjacent to the cleft, making a bone matrix through which teeth in the line of the cleft can erupt, re-stabilize alveolar process contour and maxillary segments. In cases with wide alveolar clefts, more than the width of a maxillary canine, failure of this procedure is usually encountered. So, a further step prior to grafting procedure can be done in an attempt to reduce cleft width to enhance success of future grafting.

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) which is a procedure of growing new bone by mechanical stretching of the ordinary pre-existing vascularized bone tissue by a distraction device, where both segments of new alveolar bone as well as attached gingiva are formed can be used here to aid in minimizing cleft width.

The aim of this study was to introduce a new custom-made tooth-borne distractor that could provide 3D control upon using interdental distraction osteogenesis (IDO) with a posterior segment transport anteriorly along curvature of the arch through creating a controlled fracture, then applying this distractor device carrying a bone transport segment forward, decreasing the cleft width anteriorly with another benefit of leaving behind regenerated bone and attached gingiva posteriorly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11566
        • Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University Cairo, Abbaseya, Egypt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ages ranging from 12 to 25 years old
  • Patients with repaired cleft lip and / or palate.
  • Patients with wide alveolar clefts more than 6 mm.
  • Patients with median facial clefts, absent premaxilla.
  • Patients who had previous failed grafting.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindications to general anaesthesia and surgery.
  • Patients with syndromic cleft lip and palate.
  • Patients with very bad oral hygiene.
  • Vulnerable groups.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tooth borne interdental distraction along arch curvature appliance
Patients eligible to the study were prepared to receive interdental distraction osteogenesis. The appliance was custom made for each patient. It is made up of orthodontic bands, labial, palatal stainless steel 0.9mm arches and micro expander screw soldered to the first permanent molar and to the first premolar in the transport segment .

This study aimed to provide a new design of a tooth-borne, custom-made distractor that could be easily constructed and rigid enough for controlled segment transport.

After cases' selection, arch expansion was done first.

Following expansion, preparation of the osteotomy site was done, through inducing root divergence at site of interdental osteotomy.

Osteotomies were performed under general anesthesia using piezo-surgery, there were 2 osteotomies in a L-shape; interdental vertical osteotomy mesial to 1st molar and a horizontal one above apices of teeth in the transport segment.

The distraction protocol was a latency period of 7 days, after which appliance activation started with a distraction rate of 0.4 mm/day with a rhythm of twice daily.

Activation proceeded till teeth at the edge of the cleft came into contact. Then the appliance was fixed in place for a 3 months consolidation period.

Other Names:
  • Tooth borne alveolar distractor
  • Buccal mini hyrax distractor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction of width of alveolar cleft and oronasal fistula
Time Frame: 2-3 months
Reduction or even closure of the wide interdental alveolar defect and the oronasal fistula measured on CBCT radiograph
2-3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dental changes with distraction
Time Frame: 2-3 months
Amount of dental tipping that occurred with distraction forces measured on CBCT radiograph
2-3 months
Quality of distracted bone
Time Frame: 3-6 months
Measurement of bone radio density in Hounsfield Unit from CBCT
3-6 months
Loss of anchorage with distraction forces
Time Frame: 2-3 months
Amount of distal movement of anchor molar of the assembly as a side effect of the mesial distraction forces measured on CBCT radiograph
2-3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distraction of Bone

Clinical Trials on Tooth borne Interdental distraction appliance with mini hyrax screw

Subscribe