Cerebellum and Neglect

May 6, 2026 updated by: Luzerner Kantonsspital

The Role of the Cerebellum in Recovery of Visual Neglect

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a non-invasive brain stimulation method called continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can improve attention in adults who have hemispatial neglect after stroke. Hemispatial neglect is a common consequence of stroke where a person fails to notice things on one side of their environment and body after brain damage despite having intact sensory organs. Current treatments include physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and visual scanning training.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does cTBS applied to the cerebellum shift spatial attention toward the neglected side, as measured by eye movements during a visual exploration task?
  • Does cTBS change brain activity patterns linked to attention networks, as measured by EEG?

Researchers will compare different conditions, cerebellar cTBS, cerebral cTBS and sham cTBS to see which approach best improves visuospatial attention. Sham cTBS looks and feels identical to real stimulation but does not deliver effective magnetic pulses.

Participants, who are already admitted to the neurology and neurorehabilitation ward, will attend four study visits over approximately two weeks, each lasting about one hour. They receive active or sham cTBS at three stimulation sessions, each separated by at least 48 hours. They also have their eye movements recorded using a camera-based eye-tracking system before and after each session and have their brain activity recorded using EEG, a method that measures electrical activity through small electrodes on the scalp. Participation is voluntary. Participants may withdraw at any time without any impact on their regular medical care. The study is conducted at the Neurocenter of Luzerner Kantonsspital, Switzerland, and is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Canton of Lucerne
      • Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland, 6004
        • Klinik für Neurologie und Neurorehabilitation
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First-ever, subacute right hemispheric stroke
  • Left-sided visual neglect defined by MGP > 1.333°
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity
  • MRI compatibility (MRI-based neuronavigation for cTBS)
  • Capacity to consent and ability to follow study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebellar lesion
  • History of epilepsy
  • Metallic implants in the head region
  • Scalp or skin conditions that interfere with EEG electrode placement (e.g. open wounds, infections, severe psoriasis)
  • Co-morbidities including: neurological, degenerative or major psychiatric disorder (other than index stroke), alcohol or drug abuse, severe liver or kidney disease, and active malignant tumor disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Enrolment in an ongoing clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WP1: cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then over left PIC
cTBS delivered using a MagPro X100 stimulator with a round coil (MC-125, outer radius 60 mm). Protocol: 801 pulses in 267 bursts (3 pulses at 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz). Two trains applied with a 15-minute interval. Targets: left posterior inferior cerebellum (PIC; lobules VI-VIII) and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), localized by MRI-based neuronavigation (BrainSight). Applied at 100% of individual resting motor threshold.
Active Comparator: WP1: cTBS over the left PPC. WP2: cTBS over left PIC and then over left PPC
cTBS delivered using a MagPro X100 stimulator with a round coil (MC-125, outer radius 60 mm). Protocol: 801 pulses in 267 bursts (3 pulses at 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz). Two trains applied with a 15-minute interval. Targets: left posterior inferior cerebellum (PIC; lobules VI-VIII) and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), localized by MRI-based neuronavigation (BrainSight). Applied at 100% of individual resting motor threshold.
Sham Comparator: WP1: sham cTBS over left PIC. WP2: cTBS over left PPC and then sham cTBS over left PIC
cTBS delivered using a MagPro X100 stimulator with a round coil (MC-125, outer radius 60 mm). Protocol: 801 pulses in 267 bursts (3 pulses at 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz). Two trains applied with a 15-minute interval. Targets: left posterior inferior cerebellum (PIC; lobules VI-VIII) and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), localized by MRI-based neuronavigation (BrainSight). Applied at 100% of individual resting motor threshold.
Sham stimulation delivered using the same MagPro X100 stimulator with a sham coil (MC-P-B70), which produces identical acoustic and tactile sensations as the active coil without delivering effective magnetic stimulation. Same protocol and positioning procedure as active cTBS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Gaze Position (MGP) during Free Visual Exploration (FVE)
Time Frame: pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention
MGP reflects the mean horizontal position (x-axis) of all fixations during free viewing of 24 naturalistic images. Recorded using an infrared video-based eye tracking system (EyeLink 1000 Plus; 1000 Hz). A MGP of 0 indicates centered fixation distribution; positive values indicate a rightward bias; negative values indicate a leftward shift. Fixations of 100-2000 ms are included. Assessed immediately before and after each cTBS session.
pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Time Frame: pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention
64-channel scalp EEG recorded before and after each cTBS session (ActiChamp System, Brain Products). Two analysis approaches: (1) microstate analysis assessing global brain states and connectivity patterns; (2) frequency-specific phase synchronization between left and right hemispheres as a measure of interhemispheric connectivity. Impedance kept below 5 kΩ.
pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention
MRI-based structural brain connectivity and lesion mapping
Time Frame: once at baseline
Three neuroimaging analyses: (1) Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) to examine the relationship between lesion location and magnitude of neglect improvement after cTBS; (2) Tractwise proportion analysis assessing lesioned tract proportions of four pathways of interest (cerebello-thalamo-cortical and interhemispheric callosal connections); (3) Correlational tractography using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to identify structural connectivity predictors of cTBS response. MRI acquired using a 3T Siemens Verio scanner with 32-channel head coil (MPRAGE T1: TR/TE = 2240/3.72 ms, voxel size 0.9×0.9×0.9 mm).
once at baseline
Additional Free Visual Exploration (FVE) variables
Time Frame: pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention
Secondary eye-tracking variables derived from the same FVE session as the primary outcome: number of fixations (left vs. right screen half), exploration time (left vs. right screen half), direction of first saccade, and exploration area. Recorded using the EyeLink 1000 Plus System (SR Research; 1000 Hz).
pre-intervention and immediatly after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2026-00550
  • 3200-0-239875 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds SNF (Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Continuous theta burst stimulation

Subscribe