pBFS-guided cTBS Over the Inferior Frontal Gyrus for Aphasia After Ischemic Stroke

April 2, 2025 updated by: Changping Laboratory

Personalized Brain Functional Sector-guided Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Therapy Targeting at the Inferior Frontal Gyrus for Aphasia After Ischemic Stroke: a RCT

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safeness of continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) over the right Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG), guided by personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technology, on language function recovery in patients with post-ischemic stroke aphasia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Increasing evidence suggests that rTMS has been effective in treating various psychological and neurological diseases, including treating post-stroke symptoms. Using the personalized brain functional sectors (pBFS) technique, investigators could precisely identify individualized brain functional networks and the personalized language-related stimulation site based on the resting-state functional MRI data. The current study proposes to conduct a double-blinded, randomized and parallel controlled design trial, to investigate the efficacy and safety of pBFS-guided personalized rTMS intervention in post-stroke aphasic patients.

Subjects will be randomly assigned to the following two groups: active continuous TBS (cTBS) group, or a sham control group. The allocation ratio will be 1:1. The stimulation protocol consisted of a 3-week treatment, with five consecutive days each week (totally 15 day-treatment) . The stimulation procedure will be assisted with real-time neuronavigation to ensure its precision.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China
        • Recruiting
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Jun Yu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between the ages of 35 and 75 years (including 35 and 75 years).
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria of acute ischemic stroke (using the 2019 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke and the 2018 Chinese Society of Neurology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in China). All lesions should be in the left hemisphere, and the course of disease should be more than or equal to 15 days and less than or equal to 3 months .
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for aphasia according to the Chinese version of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), with a WAB-aphasia quotient less than 93.8.
  • First onset stroke.
  • Normal functioning language abilities before the stroke, with Mandarin as their native language and an educational level higher than primary school (more than 6 years' education).
  • Understand the trial and be able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Combined severe dysarthria (NIHSS item 10 score ≥ 2 points);
  • Aphasia caused by bilateral hemispheric stroke, brain tumors, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, motor neuron disease, or other diseases;
  • Patients with implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants, or other metal foreign bodies, or those with MRI contraindications such as claustrophobia or TMS treatment contraindications;
  • History of epilepsy;
  • Patients with severe systemic diseases such as heart, lung, liver, kidney diseases, etc., which cannot be controlled by routine medications as confirmed by laboratory tests and examinations;
  • Impaired consciousness (NIHSS item 1(a) score ≥ 1 point);
  • Malignant hypertension;
  • Malignant tumor;
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year due to reasons other than stroke;
  • Severe hearing, visual, or cognitive impairments that prevent the patient from completing the trial;
  • Patients with severe depression, anxiety, or other mental illnesses that prevent them from completing the trial;
  • Patients who have received other neuroregulatory treatments such as TMS or transcranial electrical stimulation within 3 months before enrollment;
  • History of alcohol abuse, drug abuse, or other substance abuse;
  • Patients with other abnormal test results that make them unsuitable for participating in this trial as determined by the researchers;
  • Women of childbearing age who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant;
  • Patients participating in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: active cTBS group
active cTBS combined with speech language therapy
Each patient will receive two 600-pulse cTBS stimulations per day, parted by a 15-minute rest period (a total of 1200 pulses daily), for 3-week treatment, with 5 consecutive days each week.
Sham Comparator: sham cTBS group
sham cTBS combined with speech language therapy
Each patient will receive two sham 600-pulse cTBS stimulations per day, parted by a 15-minute rest period (a total of 1200 pulses daily), for 3-week treatment, with 5 consecutive days each week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Western Aphasia Battery scores
Time Frame: baseline, end of the 3-week therapy
The first four subsets of the WAB (Spontaneous Speech, Auditory verbal comprehension, Repetition, Naming and word finding) will be used to evaluate the participants' language ability impairments. A Chinese adapted version of WAB will be used. The scores from all four subsets will be calculated into an Aphasia Quotient, lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
baseline, end of the 3-week therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Western Aphasia Battery scores
Time Frame: baseline, end of the 5-day therapy, end of the follow-up of 3 weeks
The first four subsets of the WAB (Spontaneous Speech, Auditory verbal comprehension, Repetition, Naming and word finding) will be used to evaluate the participants' language ability impairments. A Chinese adapted version of WAB will be used. The scores from all four subsets will be calculated into an Aphasia Quotient, lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
baseline, end of the 5-day therapy, end of the follow-up of 3 weeks
Chinese-version Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale 39-generic version (SAQOL-39g)
Time Frame: baseline,end of the 3-week therapy,end of the follow-up of 3 weeks
The SAQOL-39g is a quality of life assessment tool that is used to evaluate the impact of stroke and aphasia on a patient's quality of life. It consists of 39 items that cover a range of domains related to the patient's quality of life, such as communication, physical functioning, mood, and social support. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much", with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
baseline,end of the 3-week therapy,end of the follow-up of 3 weeks
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Ratings
Time Frame: baseline,end of the 3-week therapy,end of the follow-up of 3 weeks
The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) Severity Ratings is a clinical tool used to evaluate the severity and type of aphasia in individuals. The assessment includes four domains: communication abilities, language content, speech sound production and response abilities. BDAE severity ratings range from level 1 to level 5, with lower scores indicating more severe aphasia.
baseline,end of the 3-week therapy,end of the follow-up of 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hesheng Liu, PhD, Changping Laboratory

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Active, not recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
    Not yet recruiting
    Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Post Stroke Aphasia | Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
    India
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on active continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

Subscribe