Long-term Assessment of BDyn Dynamic Stabilization Device in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (MOBIDYN)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Cousin Biotech

The goal of this clinical trial is to estimate the cumulative reoperation rate at upper adjacent segment level in patients treated with BDyn dynamix stabilization for lumbar degenerative disc diseases over long-term follow-up.

Patients will provide baseline socio-demographic and surgical data, complete patient-reported outcome measures (ODI, pain NRS, satisfaction), undergo imaging assessments (dynamic X-rays, EOS, MRI), and participate in safety evaluations including adverse event monitoring throughout follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient, male or female, aged ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient treated with BDyn device until end of December 2021, with between one and four fused level(s) maximum for the following indications: Degenerative intervertebral disc disease and/or articular facets confirmed by further examinations, Spinal canal stenosis, Degenerative spondylolisthesis grade 1, Segmental instability
  • Patient who signed the informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated with a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment, language barrier, or any other condition that limits their ability to understand the nature, objectives, or potential risks of the study
  • Patient that is pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • Patient with protected status under articles L1121-6, LL121-8 and L1122-2 of the French Public Health Code;
  • Patient who cannot comply with the protocol requirements based on the investigator's judgment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients treated with BDyn dynamic stabilization
All enrolled patients undergo lumbar dynamic stabilization using the BDyn device. Clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcomes are collected during long-term follow-up.
BDyn is intended for spine surgery with a posterio approach. The sterile spinal dynamic posterior stabilization devices BDyn is intended to restore the stabilization of the spine segment from T10 to S1 by preserving the anatomical lordosis and the deadening of the intervertebral joint.
Other Names:
  • BDyn
  • BDyn device
  • BDyn Cousin Biotech
  • B-Dyn

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reoperation rate at the upper adjacent segment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Cumulative reoperation rate at the upper adjacent segment will be defined as the occurrence of reoperation at this level over long-term postoperative follow-up (≥4 years)
Through study completion, an average of 10 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reoperation rate at the instrumented segment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
The aim is to estimate the cumulative reoperation rate at the instrumented segment in patients treated with BDyn dynamic stabilization for degenerative disc disease over long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe upper adjacent segment integrity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
To evaluate the upper adjacent segment integrity in patients treated with BDyn dynamic stabilization for lumbar degenerative disc disease over long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe segmental range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized segment, the upper and lower adjacent segment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
To describe segmental range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized segment, the upper and lower adjacent segment in patients treated with BDyn dynamic stabilization for degenerative disc disease over long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe disc height of the stabilized segment, the upper and lower adjacent segment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Intervertebral disc height measured in millimeters on MRI at the stabilized segment and adjacent segments (upper and lower), assessed at baseline and during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe sagittal balance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
To measure the angle of sagittal balance (the innate neutral standing position with C7 positioned over S1) in patients treated with BDyn dynamic stabilization for degenerative disc disease over long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe disc regeneration and degeneration of the stabilized segment, the upper and lower adjacent segment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Intervertebral disc degeneration assessed using the Pfirrmann grading system (grades I-V) on MRI for the stabilized segment and adjacent segments (upper and lower), evaluated at baseline and during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe disability
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Disability assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), reported as a total score ranging from 0 to 100, evaluated at baseline and during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe back pain
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Change from baseline in back pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10), assessed during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe leg pain
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Change from baseline in leg pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10), assessed during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe satisfaction
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Patient satisfaction measured using a patient-reported outcome questionnaire, reported as a total score (range to be specified), assessed during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe perioperative outcomes
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Number of participants with perioperative complications within 30 days after surgery
Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Describe clinical safety
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 year
Number of participants requiring reoperation at the treated or adjacent segments during long-term postoperative follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 10 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2026-A00343-48

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on Dynamic Lumbar Stabilization Device

Subscribe