Bone Metabolism in Patients Treated With 3d Printed Aligners Versus Thermoformed Aligners

May 24, 2026 updated by: Alexandria University

Bone Metabolism in Patients Treated With 3d Printed Aligners Versus Thermoformed Aligners (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Background: Orthodontic forces induce tissue reactions by triggering perturbations from orthodontic appliances, which lead to the modelling and remodelling of alveolar bone. Despite the growing popularity of 3D-printed aligners, no studies have compared their effects on bone metabolism in comparison with thermoformed aligners. Aim: This study aims to assess bone metabolism in patients undergoing treatment with 3D-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
        • Contact:
          • Ahmed Karkoura, BDS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ahmed Karkoura, BDS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minor malocclusion (2 to 4 mm of crowding) .
  • Patients in need for Antero-posterior expansion and labial tipping of incisors without interproximal reduction
  • No use of anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics in the past 6 months.
  • Periodontal parameters of gingival index <1 and no pocketing with a generalized pocketing depth of <3mm.
  • Radiographic parameters of no crestal bone loss.
  • No history of smoking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of inflammation of the gingiva, and periodontitis.
  • Systemic conditions (kidney disease, HIV, and liver disease).
  • Teeth missing or poor oral hygiene.
  • Bone disease e.g.; osteoporosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: directly printed aligners
Aligners will be digitally designed using the latest version of ArchForm software for segmentation of dental arches, virtual tooth movement planning and generation of sequential treatment stages, the finalized setups will be exported as STL files.
Active Comparator: thermoformed aligners
Aligners were digitally designed using the latest version of ArchForm software .The 3D-printed resin models which were used as a mold for aligner thermoforming, were fabricated by Anycubic Photon Mono M5s (12K resolution) (Anycubic, China) 3D printing machine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in levels of Osteoprotegerin (OPG)
Time Frame: up to 21 days
The frozen samples of GCF from participants with both types of aligners will be thawed at room temperature for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
up to 21 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in gingival inflammation
Time Frame: up to 21 days
A measure used to assess the severity of gingival inflammation based on color, consistency, and bleeding of the gingiva. Scores range from healthy gingiva (score 0) to severe inflammation (Score 3)
up to 21 days
change in plaque accumulation
Time Frame: up to 21 days
A clinical index used to assess the amount of dental plaque accumulated on tooth surfaces. It helps evaluate oral hygiene status by scoring plaque from (score 0) no plaque to heavy plaque accumulation (score 3)
up to 21 days
change in bleeding on probing
Time Frame: up to 21 days
A clinical sign of gingival inflammation detected when gentle probing of the gingival sulcus causes bleeding. it is yes/no variable
up to 21 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1070-05/2025

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Metabolism

Clinical Trials on Directly printed aligners using Tera Harz TA28 resin

Subscribe