Luspatercept vs Epoetin in Treating Poor Erythroid Engraftment for Hematological Malignancies

June 4, 2026 updated by: Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Luspatercept Versus Epoetin in Treating Poor Erythroid Engraftment for Hematological Malignancies

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for hematological malignancies. Nonetheless, poor graft function remains a life-threatening complication after allo-HSCT. Poor erythroid engraftment is associated with increased bleeding events and shorter survival. Current treatment methods such as epoetin or repeated red-cell transfusions are not effective for poor erythroid engraftment, with limited and transient responses. Retrospective studies suggested that luspatercept showed efficacy in patients with anemia post-transplantation or poor erythroid engraftment. However, there are no studies comparing luspatercept versus epoetin for the treatment of poor erythroid engraftment. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study to compared the effect of luspatercept versus epoetin in treating poor erythroid engraftment for hematological malignancies.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for hematological malignancies. Nonetheless, poor graft function remains a life-threatening complication after allo-HSCT, characterized by persistent cytopenias despite evidence of complete donor chimerism. Poor erythroid engraftment refers to hemoglobin <70g/L and inability to detach from red blood cell transfusion after 28 days of transplantation, which is associated with increased bleeding events and shorter survival. Current treatment methods such as epoetin or repeated red-cell transfusions are not effective for poor erythroid engraftment, with limited and transient responses. New treatment strategies are needed to enhance the response rate in patients with poor erythroid engraftment.

Luspatercept is a specific activin receptor fusion protein that reduces SMAD2 and SMAD3 signaling by binding specific transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily ligands, thereby allowing erythrocyte maturation through late-stage erythroblast differentiation. Retrospective studies suggested that luspatercept showed efficacy in patients with anemia post-transplantation or poor erythroid engraftment. To date, there have been no studies comparing luspatercept versus epoetin for the treatment of poor erythroid engraftment. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study to compared the effect of luspatercept versus epoetin in treating poor erythroid engraftment for hematological malignancies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years
  • Hematologic malignancies
  • Poor erythroid engraftment after the first allo-HSCT
  • Complete remission post-transplantation
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2
  • Epoetin-naive
  • Endogenous serum erythropoietin concentration <500 U/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy shorter than 30 days post-transplantation
  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Luspatercept group
Luspatercept
Drug: Luspatercept
Luspatercept is administered 1.0mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks; If the hemoglobin level does not increase after two consecutive administrations, the dose will be adjusted to 1.3mg/kg. If the hemoglobin level returns to the normal range, Luspatercept will be given once before discontinuing the medication.
Active Comparator: Epoetin group
Epoetin
Drug: Epoetin
Epoetin is administered 15000 IU subcutaneously every 3 weeks for 24 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erythroid response
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Erythroid response is defined as a reduction in transfusion of ≥ 4 red blood cell units/8 weeks or a mean hemoglobin increase of ≥ 1.5 g/dL/8 weeks in the absence of transfusion
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 1 year
Will calculate time from random assignment until death from any cause.
1 year
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 1 year
Will calculate time from random assignment until relapse or death from any cause
1 year
Relapse
Time Frame: 1 year
Will calculate time from random assignment until relapse
1 year
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
Defined as death from any cause not subsequent to relapse
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NFEC-2026-015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematological Malignancies

Clinical Trials on Luspatercept

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Malta

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe