Luspatercept for Clonal Cytopenias of Uncertain Significance

Efficacy of Luspatercept In Clonal Cytopenias of Uncertain Significance

The purpose of this clinical trial is to test how well the drug luspatercept works in improving low blood cell counts in people with clonal cytopenias of uncertain significance (CCUS). The main questions the study seeks to answer include:

  • How many patients experience improvements in their low blood counts (red cells, platelets, or white cells) within 24 weeks, based on specific criteria for blood conditions like myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)?
  • How long these improvements last before the condition worsens or changes.
  • The percentage of participants showing improvements at 12, 24, and 48 weeks.
  • How long it takes for the condition to progress to more severe diseases like myeloid disorders.
  • How long red blood cell responses last and how quickly these responses are seen.
  • The average change in hemoglobin levels over 24 weeks.
  • How many patients need blood transfusions during the study and how soon transfusions are required.
  • Changes in participants' well-being and energy levels based on a standardized questionnaire.
  • Monitoring for any side effects, including progression to MDS or leukemia, heart-related issues, or sudden increases in hemoglobin.

Participants will:

  • Receive luspatercept as an injection every three weeks.
  • Visit the clinic every three weeks for treatment and monitoring.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Documentation of a CCUS diagnosis.

    • Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is defined as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) detected in the presence of one or more persistent cytopenias that are otherwise unexplained by hematologic or non-hematologic conditions and that do not meet diagnostic criteria for defined myeloid neoplasms. Cytopenia definitions for diagnosis of CCUS include Hb <13 g/dL in males and <12 g/dL in females for anemia, absolute neutrophil count <1.8 ×109/L for leukopenia, and platelets <150 × 109/L for thrombocytopenia.
    • Patients should harbor somatic mutations of myeloid malignancy-associated genes detected in the blood or bone marrow at a variant allele fraction (VAF) of ≥ 2% (≥4% for X-linked gene mutations in males
  • Clinically significant cytopenias demonstrated in two separate lab draws and defined as cytopenia in any one of the following:

    • Anemia: Transfusion dependent (LTD or HTD for Hb < 9 g/dL based on IWG 2018 criteria). Exception for higher threshold up to 10g/dL for documented moderate or severe angina pectoris, cardiac or pulmonary insufficiency, or ischemic neurologic diseases (per IWG 2018 consensus recommendation).
    • Anemia NTD: symptomatic NTD CCUS with Hb <10 g/dl, symptomatic defined as moderate or worse on ≥ 1 Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) item (fatigue, shortness of breath, weakness, or dizziness)
    • Thrombocytopenia: platelet count less than 30,000 /microL or < 50,000/microL with documented bleeding events or high risk for bleeding, for example on blood thinners or drugs that inhibit platelet function for other comorbidities.
    • Neutropenia: Neutropenia below 750/microl are included in the study. For subjects with neutropenia between 750-1000/microl, subjects should have neutropenia AND a history of serious infection(s).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2
  • Adequate organ function as defined by:

    • Direct bilirubin < 3 x ULN. Indirect hyperbilirubinemia from hemolysis or Gilberts disease are not considered as impaired.
    • Estimated Creatinine clearance or GFR >30 ml/min by institutional standards (for example MDRD or Cockcroft Gault or measured by 24 hour urine clearance).
    • ALT and AST < 3 x ULN
  • Females of childbearing potential (FCBP), defined as a sexually mature woman who: 1) has achieved menarche at some point, 2) not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy or amenorrhea due to other medical reasons does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months), must:

    • Have two negative pregnancy tests (serum or urine) as verified by the investigator prior to starting study therapy (unless the screening pregnancy test was done within 72 hours of W1D1). She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study treatment.
    • Either commit to true abstinence1 from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and source documented) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, highly effective contraception2 without interruption, 5 weeks prior to starting investigational product, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 12 weeks after discontinuation of study therapy.

Male subjects must:

- Practice true abstinence1(which must be reviewed prior to each IP administration or on a monthly basis [e.g., in the event of dose delays]) or agree to use a condom (latex or non-latex, but not made out of natural [animal] membrane) during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 12 weeks following investigational product discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.

Contraception

  • True abstinence is acceptable when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. [Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception].
  • Highly effective contraception is defined in this protocol as the following (information will also appear in the ICF): Hormonal contraception (for example, birth control pills, injection, implant, transdermal patch, vaginal ring); intrauterine device (IUD); tubal ligation (tying your tubes); or a partner with a successful vasectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent malignancy requiring active concurrent systemic chemotherapy. Hormonal therapy for malignancy and targeted radiation is allowed. If patients after enrollment, have a clinical need for chemotherapy after achieving response on treatment, subjects deriving clinical benefit can be continued on study after discussion with study PI.
  • Diagnosis of MDS, AML, MPN or any other myeloid malignancy in the patient's lifetime
  • Active uncontrolled infection that in the investigators opinion will affect study procedures and/or results
  • Active uncontrolled hypertension not responding to blood pressure lowering medications which in the investigator's opinion will be harmful for the patient.
  • Use of ESA or growth factors within four weeks prior to the start of the study
  • Known risk factors for thromboembolism (splenectomy, concomitant use of hormone replacement therapy or recent uncontrolled pulmonary embolism or DVT in the last 6 months). Subjects adequately controlled on anticoagulation are permitted.
  • Pregnant or nursing women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment and for up to 130 days after last dose of study drug. Basic contraception methods are defined in Section 4.4.

    • Women are considered post-menopausal and not of childbearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (i.e. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks prior to first dose of study drug. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of childbearing potential. If local regulations deviate from the contraception methods listed above to prevent pregnancy, local regulations apply and will be described in the Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Luspatercept
Luspatercept administered at 1 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks
Administered at 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients achieving cytopenia responses as defined by HI-E, HI-P, HI-N, mHI-E responses
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Adapted from International Working Group (IWG) 2018 response definition for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
24 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of cytopenia response
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
The duration of cytopenia response, defined as the time from the first documented achievement of cytopenia response to the loss of response or disease progression.
24 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Response
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
12 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Response
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
24 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Response
Time Frame: 48 Weeks
48 Weeks
Time to Transformation to Myeloid Disease
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Time to transformation to myeloid disease as evidenced by bone marrow morphology findings.
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Duration of modified hematologic improvement-erythroid (mHI-E)
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Duration of modified hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) per IWG 2006
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Time to mHI-E
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Time to hematologic improvement-erythroid (mHI-E) per IWG 2006
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Mean Change Hemoglobin (Hb)
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Weeks
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Number of Patients Converting to Transfusion Dependence (TD)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Number of patients who convert to transfusion dependence (≥ 3 units/16 weeks per IWG 2018 criteria) at 12 weeks, provided they were not transfusion-dependent at study entry.
12 Weeks
Number of Patients Converting to Transfusion Dependence (TD)
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Number of patients who convert to transfusion dependence (≥ 3 units/16 weeks per IWG 2018 criteria) at 24 weeks, provided they were not transfusion-dependent at study entry.
24 Weeks
Number of Patients Converting to Transfusion Dependence (TD)
Time Frame: 48 Weeks
Number of patients who convert to transfusion dependence (≥ 3 units/16 weeks per IWG 2018 criteria) at 48 weeks, provided they were not transfusion-dependent at study entry.
48 Weeks
Time to the first red blood cell transfusion
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
24 Weeks
Mean Change in FACT-An Total Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) total scores. The FACT-An (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Anemia) questionnaire is a validated tool designed to evaluate the quality of life in patients with anemia, especially those receiving treatment for cancer-related anemia. The total FACT-An score ranges from 0 to 188.
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Mean Change in FACT-An Subscale Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) subscale scores. The FACT-An (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Anemia) questionnaire is a validated tool designed to evaluate the quality of life in patients with anemia, especially those receiving treatment for cancer-related anemia. The questionnaire consists of five subscales, with score ranges varying by subscale: 0-28, 0-24, or 0-80.
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with MDS/AML progression
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Safety as assessed by number of cardiovascular events
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Safety as assessed by number of subjects with rapid hemoglobin rise
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Number of participants achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for at least 24 consecutive weeks
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Number of participants achieving Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid (HI-E) for at least 24 consecutive week as per IWG 2006 criteria.
Time Frame: Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Week 4 (Cycle 1 Week 1) to 24 Weeks
Duration of RBC-TI greater than 16 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 1 to Week 24
Duration of red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for greater than 16 weeks
Week 1 to Week 24
Number of participants achieving RBC-TI
Time Frame: 16 Weeks
Number of participants achieving RBC-TI over 16 weeks along with a mean hemoglobin increase of >1.5 g/dL over the same time period.
16 Weeks
Change in cardiac biomarkers over the treatment period
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Weeks
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Mean Change Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) Assessment
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) is the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) tool used in this study. The lowest possible score is 0, which reflects the worst possible quality of life, indicating severe impairments in overall well-being and significant anemia-related symptoms. The highest possible score is 188, representing the best possible quality of life, with minimal or no symptoms and optimal functioning across all domains, including anemia-related concerns.
12 Weeks
Mean Change Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) Assessment
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) is the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) tool used in this study. The lowest possible score is 0, which reflects the worst possible quality of life, indicating severe impairments in overall well-being and significant anemia-related symptoms. The highest possible score is 188, representing the best possible quality of life, with minimal or no symptoms and optimal functioning across all domains, including anemia-related concerns.
24 Weeks
Mean Change Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) Assessment
Time Frame: 48 Weeks
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) is the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) tool used in this study. The lowest possible score is 0, which reflects the worst possible quality of life, indicating severe impairments in overall well-being and significant anemia-related symptoms. The highest possible score is 188, representing the best possible quality of life, with minimal or no symptoms and optimal functioning across all domains, including anemia-related concerns.
48 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pinkal Desai, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe