Propolis-Based Solution Application in Extraction Socket Healing

June 24, 2026 updated by: Saint-Joseph University

Propolis-Based Solution Application in Extraction Socket Healing: A 3D Split-Mouth Clinical Pilot Study

This pilot study evaluated whether a propolis-based topical solution improves soft-tissue healing after tooth extraction. Thirteen patients requiring extraction of two comparable teeth on opposite sides of the mouth were enrolled in a split-mouth design, in which one extraction site received the propolis solution while the other served as an internal control. The test site was treated with the propolis solution three times daily for seven days, while the control site received only saline rinses. Healing was tracked using 3D intraoral scans obtained before extraction and on days 7 and 14 afterward, allowing the percentage of socket closure to be measured objectively over time. Postoperative pain was also assessed using a standard visual pain scale on days 1, 3, and 7. The study aimed to determine whether this propolis-based formulation could serve as a natural, low-cost adjunct to standard post-extraction care to support faster tissue repair.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Saint Joseph University of Beirut

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cooperative adult patients willing to accept the study protocol
  • Minors with a cooperative parent/legal guardian providing consent
  • Non-surgical extraction of bilaterally positioned teeth
  • Low-to-moderate extraction difficulty per the Pederson scale
  • Systemically healthy, with no history of systemic disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-consenting patients
  • Failure to attend follow-up appointments per protocol
  • Heavy smokers (>10 pack-years)
  • Systemic disease (e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive syndromes)
  • Current use of contraceptive medication
  • Systemic antibiotic therapy within the previous 3 months
  • Anticoagulant therapy within the previous 4 weeks
  • Requirement for antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Known allergy to honey or bee-related products
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics used in dental procedures
  • Higher-difficulty extractions requiring sutures or other hemostatic measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Extraction site treated with a propolis-based solution

Drug: Propolis-Based Solution

"A topical solution (52% propolis extract, clove oil, and white willow bark extract) applied to the test extraction socket via brush applicator three times daily for seven days."

Active Comparator: Contralateral extraction site treated with saline mouthwash only
The contralateral extraction socket received saline mouthwash only, with no active therapeutic agent applied, following the same pre-application oral hygiene steps (tooth brushing and saline rinse) as the test site

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Extraction Socket Surface Area Closure
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, and Day 14 post-extraction
Percentage reduction in socket surface area from baseline, calculated from 3D intraoral scans using the formula: % Closure = (Baseline area - Timepoint area) / Baseline area × 100.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, and Day 14 post-extraction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 3, and Day 7 post-extraction
Pain intensity rated on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Day 1, Day 3, and Day 7 post-extraction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data sharing beyond what is reported in this article is not currently planned. The informed consent obtained from participants covered publication of anonymized results and clinical images within the manuscript but did not include explicit provisions for sharing de-identified, individual-level data with third-party researchers. Additionally, given the small sample size (12-13 participants) drawn from a single institution, there is an elevated risk that combinations of variables in a shared dataset could allow indirect re-identification of participants.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

3
Subscribe