Bedside Ultrasound for Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement in the Emergency Department

June 20, 2026 updated by: Antalya Health Sciences University

The Role of Bedside Ultrasound in Confirming Endotracheal Tube Placement in Patients Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department

This prospective observational study evaluated the role of bedside ultrasound in confirming endotracheal tube placement in adult patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Correct placement of the endotracheal tube is critical because unrecognized incorrect placement may cause hypoxemia, hypoxic brain injury, or death.

In this study, bedside ultrasound was performed during or immediately after endotracheal intubation without interfering with the intubation procedure. Ultrasound findings were compared with capnographic end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement, which was used as the reference method for confirming tube placement. The main aim was to assess whether bedside ultrasound is a useful and reliable method for confirming endotracheal tube position in emergency department patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-center, prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in the Emergency Department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital. Adult patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in the emergency department after ethics committee approval were included.

Endotracheal intubation was performed as part of routine emergency care by the most senior emergency medicine resident or an experienced emergency physician. Bedside ultrasound assessment was performed during or immediately after intubation by trained emergency physicians without interrupting or delaying the intubation procedure. The ultrasound examination was performed from the suprasternal notch region to assess the position of the endotracheal tube.

The physicians who performed bedside ultrasound had at least two years of emergency medicine experience and had completed accredited ultrasound training. Before study data collection, they received additional theoretical and practical training focused on ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube placement.

Ultrasound findings were compared with capnometric end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement, which was used as the reference method for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement. Ultrasound images were stored in the hospital computer system and reviewed by two qualified, independent radiology specialists. Images or measurements with insufficient quality were excluded from analysis. Agreement between ultrasound assessments was evaluated statistically.

The study aimed to determine whether bedside ultrasound can be used as a rapid, reliable, and practical method for confirming endotracheal tube placement in emergency department patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • konyaaltı
      • Antalya, konyaaltı, Turkey (Türkiye), 07100
        • University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of adult patients aged 18 years or older who presented to the Emergency Department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital and underwent endotracheal intubation as part of routine emergency care. Patients were included after ethics committee approval if bedside ultrasound and capnometric end-tidal carbon dioxide assessment were performed for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in the emergency department as part of routine emergency care
  • Patients in whom bedside ultrasound and capnometric end-tidal carbon dioxide assessment were performed for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age
  • Patients with missing or incomplete study data
  • Patients with ultrasound images of insufficient quality for evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department
Adult patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in the emergency department were included in this cohort. Endotracheal intubation was performed as part of routine emergency care. Bedside ultrasound was performed during or immediately after intubation by trained emergency physicians without interrupting the procedure. Ultrasound findings were compared with capnometric end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement, which was used as the reference method for confirming endotracheal tube placement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of Bedside Ultrasound for Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement
Time Frame: During or immediately after endotracheal intubation, within a maximum of 20 seconds
The diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement will be evaluated by comparing ultrasound findings with capnometric end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement, which will be used as the reference method. Diagnostic performance will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, overall accuracy, and agreement with the reference method.
During or immediately after endotracheal intubation, within a maximum of 20 seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MURAT DUYAN, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
  • Study Director: HALIT EKICI, MEDICAL DOCTOR, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
  • Study Director: CEMIL KAVALCI, PROFESSOR, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
  • Study Director: ENGIN DENIZ ARSLAN, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
  • Study Director: FEVZI YILMAZ, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly because the study includes clinical data from emergency department patients and there may be confidentiality and institutional restrictions. De-identified aggregate results will be reported in scientific publications.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Intubation

3
Subscribe