Camera-based Endoscopy Allows Spontaneous Breathing Diagnostic Management in Neonates With Tracheoesophageal Fistula (CBESB)

July 1, 2026 updated by: Stefano Mariconti, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
The investigators aim to compare rigid tracheoscopy versus flexible tracheo-video-endoscopy in neonates requiring diagnostic assessment before undergoing a congenital tracheoesophageal fistula repair.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tracheoesophageal fistula, with or without esophageal atresia, is a rare congenital malformation which may be included in a wider spectrum of congenital abnormalities (VACTERL: vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal and limb abnormalities). This condition presents challenging airway management due to the risk of gastric distension during positive pressure ventilation. ERNICA guidelines suggest that a tracheoscopy should be routinely performed preoperatively to evaluate the fistula position, rule out a double fistula, and identify other tracheal pathology; however, the optimal setting and approach remains controversial. Rigid tracheoscopy, performed in paralyzed neonates, can provide superior visualization of the trachea, but with a risk of gastric distension; moreover, the learning curve is steep. Flexible tracheoscopy using conventional fiberoptic bronchoscopes could allow maintenance of spontaneous breathing, but image quality is poor. New-generation disposable video-endoscopes come equipped with a miniaturized camera that replaces traditional fiberoptic technology, enabling enhanced visualization. The goal of this observational ambispective study is to compare the outcomes of two different airway management approaches in neonates and infants undergoing congenital tracheoesophageal fistula repair: rigid tracheoscopy with flexible video-endoscopy. The main questions the investigators aim to answer are: Is the tracheal flexible video-endoscopy performed in spontaneously breathing neonates effective, regarding optimal tracheal visualization and therefore for accurate diagnosis? Does it allow the successful detection and eventually rigid wire cannulation of the fistula? Are there differences between the two approaches, regarding the procedure length, or the incidence of complications (desaturation, gastric distension, respiratory depression, major cardiopulmonary complications)? Do the two approaches differ in learning curve shape? The investigators will compare a historical cohort of neonates who underwent rigid tracheoscopy with positive pressure ventilation, with a prospective group of neonates that will receive spontaneous breathing flexible tracheoscopy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Italy
      • Bergamo, Italy, Italy, 24100
        • Recruiting
        • Sc Ricerca Clinica, Sviluppo E Innovazione
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive neonates undergoing surgical repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula at a single tertiary pediatric center (ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy). The retrospective cohort includes patients treated from January 2013; the prospective cohort includes patients enrolled from October 2024 onward.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates who have undergone surgical repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula at ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, from 1 January 2013 onwards
  • Written informed consent signed by both parents or legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal or inability to obtain informed consent from parents or legal guardian

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
flexible video-endoscopy
Neonates undergoing surgical repair of tracheoesophageal fistula from October 2024 onwards, in whom preoperative airway assessment is performed by flexible video-endoscopy (Ambu aScope 5 Broncho 2.7/1.2) under deep sedation with maintenance of spontaneous breathing and topical anesthesia of the upper airways and vocal cords.
Flexible tracheoscopy is performed with Ambu 2.7 flexible video-endoscopy under sedation in spontaneously breathing neonates
rigid tracheoscopy
All neonates who underwent surgical repair of tracheoesophageal fistula from January 2013 to September 2024, plus neonates undergoing surgical repair of tracheoesophageal fistula from October 2024 onwards, in whom preoperative airway assessment was performed by rigid optical tracheoscopy under general anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation.
Rigid tracheoscopy is performed with rigid 3.0 or 3.5 mm optical device under general anesthesia and positive pressure ventilation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic success rate of preoperative tracheoscopy
Time Frame: Intraoperative (at the time of the preoperative tracheoscopy procedure)
Percentage of procedures in which the technique allowed correct visualization of the tracheoesophageal fistula, including identification of secondary fistulas, out of total procedures performed with each method (rigid vs flexible bronchoscopy)
Intraoperative (at the time of the preoperative tracheoscopy procedure)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of anesthetic complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Rate of preoperative or intraoperative anesthetic complications (respiratory, cardiovascular) during tracheoscopy and surgical repair
Intraoperative
Learning curve of each tracheoscopy technique
Time Frame: From the first procedure to the achievement of autonomous competence with each technique, assessed over the total study duration (up to 5 years)
Number of supervised procedures required before the operator achieved adequate autonomous proficiency with rigid vs flexible bronchoscopy
From the first procedure to the achievement of autonomous competence with each technique, assessed over the total study duration (up to 5 years)
Gastric distension
Time Frame: Perioperative (at initiation of the surgical procedure)
Presence of gastric distension (yes/no) at the beginning of the surgical phase
Perioperative (at initiation of the surgical procedure)
Arterial blood gas values at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately before tracheoscopy)
Arterial blood gas parameters (pH, PCO2, PO2, lactate, base excess) at baseline (prior to tracheoscopy)
Baseline (immediately before tracheoscopy)
Arterial blood gas values at beginning of surgery
Time Frame: Perioperative (at initiation of the surgical procedure)
Arterial blood gas parameters (pH, PCO2, PO2, lactate, base excess) at beginning of the surgical procedure
Perioperative (at initiation of the surgical procedure)
Arterial blood gas values at end of surgery
Time Frame: At conclusion of the surgical procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Description: Arterial blood gas parameters (pH, PCO2, PO2, lactate, base excess) at conclusion of the surgical procedure
At conclusion of the surgical procedure (up to 30 minutes)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of gastric distension at end of surgery
Time Frame: At conclusion of the surgical procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Presence of gastric distension (yes/no), assessed at conclusion of the surgical procedure
At conclusion of the surgical procedure (up to 30 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ezio Bonanomi, MD, A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Clinical Trials on flexible video endoscopy of trachea

3
Subscribe