Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Versus Flexible Intubation Video Endoscope (FIVE) in Obese Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

March 14, 2018 updated by: Ahmed Abdalla, Cairo University

Tracheal intubation is one of the most common medical procedures performed in hospitals. On one hand, it is highly successful and easy to perform using a rigid laryngoscope. On the other hand, hypoxic brain damage and death may result rapidly if it is unsuccessful. This disastrous outcome happens when the airway cannot be secured by intubation and face mask ventilation becomes difficult.

Careful preoperative evaluation to identify patients in whom tracheal intubation and mask ventilation may prove to be difficult can save lives.

Over the past 40 years, different techniques of tracheal intubation have been introduced, the most effective under different conditions being fiberoptic intubation.

The flexible intubation video endoscope is a relatively new device which delivers clear, pixel-free images without a Moiré pattern. The flexible intubation video endoscope can be directly connected to the C-MAC® monitor. Due to the Distal Chip technology the user enjoys a full-format direct video imaging with improved image quality with a resolution higher than fiberoptic bronchoscopy which has another disadvantage of being Fragile where Fibres can be broken or have transmission loss when wrapped around curves of only a few centimeters radius.

After ethics approval and informed consent from patients, 60 obese patients aging from 20-60 years will randomly allocated and divided into two groups each is (Thirty) patients in each group, using flexible intubation video endoscope(FIVE) in (group1) and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in (group 2).

The study will compare the techniques for time of intubation, hemodynamic (SBP, DBP and HR) changes, success rate, number of attempts and complications in both groups.

investigators expect from this study that flexible intubation video endoscope(FIVE) has become a good alternative and associated with better visualization of laryngeal structures in shorter time as compared to traditional flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Airway management is considered a cardinal aspect of anesthetic practice and of emergency and intensive care medicine. Endotracheal intubation is a simple, safe, rapid and nonsurgical method that achieves all the objectives of airway management which include maintaining a patent airway, lung protection from aspiration and allows leak free ventilation during mechanical ventilation. Even though endotracheal intubation isn't a complication free procedure, some of them life-threatening. It is important to anesthesiologists to be alert to these complications and to have an effective plan to avoid and manage these complications when they occur .

If a clear airway can't be guaranteed, it can be fatal. In 1990, an analysis of anesthesia-related closed claims in the USA declared that respiratory system adverse outcomes were the lone largest class of injury and that the percentage of death or catastrophic brain insult associated with it was much higher than that associated with cardiovascular problems.Since then, it became a priority to decrease the serious adverse outcomes associated with airway management; major protocols for difficult airway management have been defined, developing new reliable airway devices, and adequate monitoring of ventilation by pulse oximetry and capnography have become a standard. Thanks to these efforts, the incidence of these serious adverse outcomes is likely to be reduced, and airway management can now be considered as a safe procedure.

Endotracheal intubation is still the "gold standard" in airway management . If with using traditional techniques or video-assisted techniques which can be used when there is intubation failure or anticipated difficult airway. Video-assisted techniques may help to increase intubation success.

Video-assisted techniques allow to indirectly visualize the laryngeal structures with fiber optical or camera chip technique and to show the video picture on an external or built-in monitor.

Fiberoptic intubation has been considered for a long time the gold standard technique for intubation when there is anticipated or known difficult airway or as a rescue device in can't intubate but can ventilate scenarios . Fibreoptic intubation can be a hard skill to teach, gain and keep.In this context, closed claims analysis has declared severe complications such as catastrophic brain insult and death occurred with anticipated difficult airway management and awake intubation. Therefore, it is considerable to develop simple, dependable, safe, and effective intubation devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11451
        • Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 20 and 50 years.
  • Scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.
  • Patient with ASA physical status I-II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Unable to give consent

    • Patient with ASA physical status more than II.
    • Age < 20years old and >50years
    • Pregnant patient.
    • Known, difficult airway
    • Loose teeth
    • Require a rapid sequence induction,
    • If special endotracheal tube (ETT) is needed for the case.
    • Emergency surgeries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy
Fiberoptic intubation has been considered for a long time the gold standard technique for intubation when there is anticipated or known difficult airway or as a rescue device in can't intubate but can ventilate scenarios
Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy versus flexible intubation video endoscope regarding intubation time in obese patients
Experimental: Fexible intubation video endoscopy
Video-assisted techniques allow to indirectly visualize the laryngeal structures with fiber optical or camera chip technique and to show the video picture on an external or built-in monitor
Fexible intubation video endoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful intubation
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Time in Minutes of successful intubation.
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of first successful intubation
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Rate of first time success intubation
Intraoperative
Second trial for successful intubation
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intubation success in second trial
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N-68-2016/Ms

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Via scholar Gate

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy

3
Subscribe