Effect of an Occlusal Splint in Swimming Performance

July 7, 2026 updated by: Juan Antonio Blaya, Universidad Europea de Valencia

Effect of a Customized Occlusal Splint on Athletic Performance in Master Swimmers: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial

Optimizing sports performance depends on the interaction of physiological, biomechanical, and neuromuscular factors. In recent years, interest has increased in the relationship between stomatognathic function and athletic performance, particularly regarding the possible role of occlusal splints in neuromuscular activation. This study evaluated the effect of a customized occlusal splint on the increase of Concurrent Activation Potentiation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46003
        • Universidad Europea de Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

To be eligible for inclusion, participants had to be between 20 and 40 years of age, actively participating in regular swimming training, free from acute or chronic injuries, and willing to comply with the study protocol. Exclusion criteria included use of performance-enhancing substances, presence of systemic diseases, current use of medication affecting performance, active orthodontic appliances, temporomandibular joint disorders, pregnancy, or failure to complete the study protocol.

(It won't let me add the flowchart image, so I'll describe it below)

  1. Participamos assessed for eligibility (n=24)
  2. Excluded (n=4) 2.1 Did not Meet inclusion criteria (n=3) 2.2 Did not provide informed consent (n=1)
  3. Randomized (n=20) 3.1 Intervention group (case) (n=10) 3.1.1 Lost to follow-up (n=0) 3.1.2 Analyzed (n=10) 3.2 Control group (n=10) 3.2.1 Lost to follow-up (n=0) 3.2.2 Analyzed (n=10)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: intervention group, which used a customized occlusal splint
occlusal Splint
Other: control group, which continued training without a splint
occlusal Splint

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
swimming performance
Time Frame: Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1
swimming performance was quantified as pace in 100 meters and 50 meters freestyle, both measured in seconds with a digital stopwatch (SRUIS, ZSD013, France). For each participant and distance, three consecutive trials were recorded under standardized conditions, and averaged for statistical analysis
Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke efficiency
Time Frame: Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1
Stroke efficiency was measured as the number of strokes per 25 meters, determined by direct observation and manual counting by two externals observers
Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular efficiency
Time Frame: Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1
Cardiovascular efficiency was assessed as maximum heart rate measured in beats per minute using a chest strap sensor (Garmin HRM-Pro-Plus), synchronized with a receiver unit (Garmin Forerunner 255s)
Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1
Maximum heart rate
Time Frame: Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1
Maximum heart rate was operationally defined as the highest value recorded during maximal effort testing
Measurements were taken during the training sessions, in day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 24, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on occlusal splint

3
Subscribe