Telecare Psychosocial and Cognitive Intervention for Children and Adolescents With Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (TPCLGMD)

July 13, 2026 updated by: University of Deusto

Telecare-Mediated Psychosocial and Cognitive Intervention for Children and Adolescents With Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a telecare-mediated psychosocial and cognitive intervention for children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. This group-based intervention (comprising 5 participants) consists of 12 weekly one-hour sessions. The objective of the intervention is to improve the participants' quality of life as well as to reduce their symptomatology by targeting areas such as social cognition, emotional and personal management, cognitive restructuring, relaxation strategies, social skills, and coping strategies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Development and implementation of a psychosocial and cognitive tele-assistance programme for groups of children and adolescents affected by limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. In this project the variables of interest and intervention include social cognition, quality of life, psychological symptomatology and coping strategies. The aim of this study is to test whether this programme improves the indicators in the mentioned variables.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Biscay
      • Bilbao, Biscay, Spain, 48007
        • Recruiting
        • University of Deusto
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be diagnosed with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy
  • Being between 7 and 17 years old
  • Having signed an informed consent form through their legal guardians prior to participation in the study
  • Having Spanish as one of their main languages
  • Having access to a computer (with a camera, microphone and speakers integrated) and Internet connection to take part in the videoconferences

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any other diagnosis or sensory deficit that would prevent the application of the tests or hinder the correct performance of the intervention's activities
  • Being illiterate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control
Waiting list control group
The intervention is carried out in groups of 5 participants and is organised in 12 sessions: 1 session per week of 1h duration. The objective of the intervention is to improve the participants' quality of life as well as to reduce their symptomatology by targeting areas such as social cognition, emotional and personal management, cognitive restructuring, relaxation strategies, social skills, and coping strategies.
Experimental: Intervention
Neuro-psychosocial intervention with 12 groupal sessions is offered
The intervention is carried out in groups of 5 participants and is organised in 12 sessions: 1 session per week of 1h duration. The objective of the intervention is to improve the participants' quality of life as well as to reduce their symptomatology by targeting areas such as social cognition, emotional and personal management, cognitive restructuring, relaxation strategies, social skills, and coping strategies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social cognition - Theory of mind - NEPSY-II
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
Theory of Mind subtest of the Social Perception Domain of the NEPSY-II in the Spanish edition (Korkman et al., 2014) assesses figurative language, imitation skills, and the capacity to comprehend the thoughts, ideas, and beliefs of others and it also evaluates a person's capacity to comprehend how emotions relate to the social context.
3 months after the intervention
Social cognition - Emotion Recognition
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
Affect Recognition subtest of the Social Perception Domain of the NEPSY-II in the Spanish edition (Korkman et al., 2014) measures the capacity to identify emotions (happy, sad, neutral, afraid, irrationally angry, and disgust) in various images of children.
3 months after the intervention
Social cognition - Theory of mind - Happé's Strange Stories
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
The Happé's Strange Stories Test is a well-known test of ToM (Happé, 1994; Spanish version: Pousa, 2002). In this study, we used the White et al. (2009) version that has eight story-types. This test evaluates participants' capacity to comprehend nonliteral meanings through the reading of brief vignettes.
3 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
How an individual's health status impacts their overall well-being and ability to lead a satisfying life The perception of HRQoL is assessed in both healthy and chronically ill children using the Spanish version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQLTM 4.0) (Varni et al., 2001). We used the self-report questionnaire in this study for three age ranges: 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18. Physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and academic functioning are the four dimensions covered by the 23-item assessment. The PedsQL 4.0 provides a physical and a psychosocial summary score in addition to a total score. It is answered through a likert scale with 5 response options that are then converted into quantitative scores ranging from 0-100 points, with a higher score being a better HRQoL.
3 months after the intervention
Health-related quality of life neuromuscular
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
How an individual's health status impacts their physical well-being and ability to communicate their disease The perception of HRQoL is assessed in both healthy and chronically ill children using the Spanish version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Neuromuscular (PedsQLTM Neuromuscular) (Varni et al., 2001). We used the self-report questionnaire in this study for three age ranges: 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18. Neuromuscular disease, communication and family functioning are the three dimensions covered by the 25-item assessment. The PedsQL Neuromuscular provides a physical and a communication skills summary score in addition to a total score. It is answered through a likert scale with 5 response options that are then converted into quantitative scores ranging from 0-100 points, with a higher score being a better HRQoL.
3 months after the intervention
Children's Depression Inventory-Short
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
Depression symptoms The Children's Depression Inventory-Short (Kovacs, 1992; Spanish version: Barrio et al. 2012) measures key signs of depression such as sadness, sleep issues, and low self-esteem in just a few. It is a 10-item self-report questionnaire designed to quickly screen for depressive symptoms in youths aged 7 to 17. Each choice is scored from 0 to 2, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity.
3 months after the intervention
Child Medical Fear
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
To what children have fear in a medical context The Child Medical Fear scale (Broome et al., 1988; Spanish version: San Martin-Rodriguez et al., 2021) is an assessment tool used to measure a child's anxiety and fear regarding medical events and healthcare environments. It has 17 items in total, and the scores are rated on a 3-point Likert scale: Not at all (0 points), A little (1 point), and A lot (2 points). It helps pediatricians and psychologists identify specific triggers-such as physical pain or loss of control-so they can tailor medical care to reduce a child's stress.
3 months after the intervention
Psychopathology
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
Behavioral and emotional symptoms The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6-18 (CBCL/6-18) (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) is a multiaxial assessment tool for identifying behavioral and emotional issues in children and adolescents that is aligned with the ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). It has 113 items total, broken down into eight scales for the following syndromes: anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thinking problems, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior and aggressive behavior. Scores for internalizing, externalizing, and overall difficulties are also provided by the items.
3 months after the intervention
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention
Mental, emotion and behaviour health possible problems The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 1997; Spanish version: García et al., 2000) is a brief behavioral and emotional screening tool for children and adolescents aged 2 to 17. It uses 25 questions across five categories (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer relationship problems and prosocial behavior) to assess both psychological problems and positive social behaviors.
3 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This plan is open to other reserchers to contact the principal investigator of the study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data is available from now until 2029.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

This plan is open to other reserchers to contact the principal investigator of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Social Skills

Clinical Trials on Neuro-psychosocial teleassistance program

3
Subscribe