- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07806643
Facilitating the Implementation of Population-wide Genomic Screening (FOCUS)
September 2, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
This is a multi-site hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that uses a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design to evaluate the impact of the FOCUS toolkit, a multicomponent implementation guide, on improving the implementation of population-wide genomic screening (PGS) programs across diverse healthcare settings.
The trial will assess program-level outcomes using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and explore mechanisms of change and implementation process progression.
The study involves program-level and individual-level data collection and will not alter clinical care or treatment decisions of individuals made by participating sites.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To help facilitate growth of population-wide genomic screening (PGS) programs and enhance recruitment and retention of representative populations into genomic initiatives, this study propose to identify best practices for PGS implementation and develop and test a freely available, online multicomponent implementation guide (FOCUS toolkit).
This project will establish a gold standard approach for integrating PGS and offer the field generalizable methods and knowledge about PGS implementation.
Specifically, using a stakeholder-engaged Implementation Mapping approach we will: 1) conduct a qualitative needs assessment among ten PGS programs (FOCUS design sites) at various implementation stages (emerging, implementing, sustaining) guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, 2) develop and produce the FOCUS toolkit consisting of implementation strategies, materials, and protocols, and 3) evaluate the impact of the FOCUS toolkit on Reach, Effectiveness, Implementation, Adoption, Maintenance outcomes for PGS in 12 PGS sites (FOCUS test sites) using a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
These findings will: 1) provide a standardized approach and evaluation framework for programs seeking to strategically implement and expand population-based approaches for identifying individuals and families at high risk of serious, yet preventable disease, 2) provide generalizable methods and knowledge about PGS, and 3) support efforts to bring the promise of precision health to all.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
8
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Caitlin Allen, PhD
- Phone Number: 614-554-5298
- Email: Caitlin.Allen@wfusm.edu
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- University of North Carolina
-
Contact:
- Megan Roberts
- Phone Number: 919-962-2211
- Email: megan.roberts@unc.edu
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
- Moses Cone Hospital
-
Contact:
- Alison Sigmon
- Phone Number: 919-962-2211
- Email: alison.sigmon@conehealth.com
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
-
Contact:
- Lori Orlando
- Phone Number: 704-863-6000
- Email: Lori.Orlando@wfusm.edu
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18015
- St. Luke's University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Christopher Chapman
- Phone Number: 866-785-8537
- Email: Christopher.Chapman@sluhn.org
-
York, Pennsylvania, United States, 17403
- WellSpan York Hospital
-
Contact:
- Anwar Chahal
- Phone Number: 717-851-2345
- Email: cchahal@wellspan.org
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Baylor College of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Kyler Godwin
- Phone Number: 713-798-4951
- Email: Kyler.Godwin@bcm.edu
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Farhaan Vahidy
- Phone Number: 713-704-4000
- Email: Farhaan.Vahidy@memorialhermann.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
This study will include specific sites population genomic screening (PGS) rather than individual participants.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Operate an active or population genomic screening (PGS) program.
- Agree to utilize the FOCUS Toolkit throughout the trial and engage staff in its use and fidelity tracking.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a data use agreement and comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study.
- Ability to provide program-level data (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) quarterly.
- Confirmation of implementing or sustaining stage, as determined by the investigator.
- Capacity to participate in stakeholder surveys and interviews at study conclusion.
- Ability to read and understand the English language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- They lack infrastructure to collect and share required data.
- They cannot commit to toolkit use or quarterly reporting.
- They are unable to comply with study timelines
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
FOCUS Toolkit
|
The FOCUS toolkit is a multicomponent implementation guide on improving the implementation of population-wide genomic screening programs across diverse healthcare settings.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Time Frame: Month 4
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 4
|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 10
|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Time Frame: Month 16
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Time Frame: Month 4
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Time Frame: Month 16
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Time Frame: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Number of Sites Participating in PGS
Time Frame: Month 19
|
Adoption is defined as the uptake of population-based genomic screening (PGS) at each site, measured by the number of sites participating in PGS relative to those eligible.
Measured through stakeholder surveys
|
Month 19
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure survey includes 4 items with the total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of acceptability.
|
Month 19
|
|
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure survey includes 4 items with a total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of appropriateness.
|
Month 19
|
|
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure survey includes 4 items with a total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of feasibility.
|
Month 19
|
|
Number of Individuals that Completed High-Risk Management
Time Frame: Month 19
|
Maintenance will be assessed by the number of individuals with positive results that completed high-risk management
|
Month 19
|
|
Program Sustainability Assessment
Time Frame: Month 19
|
Maintenance will be assessed by using the Program Sustainability Assessment survey has 40 items with a total score range of 40-280.
Higher scores indicate greater sustainability capacity.
|
Month 19
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Caitlin Allen, PhD, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 2, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
September 8, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 8, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 2, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00143953
- R01HG013851-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.