- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT07806643
Facilitating the Implementation of Population-wide Genomic Screening (FOCUS)
2 september 2026 uppdaterad av: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
This is a multi-site hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that uses a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design to evaluate the impact of the FOCUS toolkit, a multicomponent implementation guide, on improving the implementation of population-wide genomic screening (PGS) programs across diverse healthcare settings.
The trial will assess program-level outcomes using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and explore mechanisms of change and implementation process progression.
The study involves program-level and individual-level data collection and will not alter clinical care or treatment decisions of individuals made by participating sites.
Studieöversikt
Status
Har inte rekryterat ännu
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
To help facilitate growth of population-wide genomic screening (PGS) programs and enhance recruitment and retention of representative populations into genomic initiatives, this study propose to identify best practices for PGS implementation and develop and test a freely available, online multicomponent implementation guide (FOCUS toolkit).
This project will establish a gold standard approach for integrating PGS and offer the field generalizable methods and knowledge about PGS implementation.
Specifically, using a stakeholder-engaged Implementation Mapping approach we will: 1) conduct a qualitative needs assessment among ten PGS programs (FOCUS design sites) at various implementation stages (emerging, implementing, sustaining) guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, 2) develop and produce the FOCUS toolkit consisting of implementation strategies, materials, and protocols, and 3) evaluate the impact of the FOCUS toolkit on Reach, Effectiveness, Implementation, Adoption, Maintenance outcomes for PGS in 12 PGS sites (FOCUS test sites) using a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
These findings will: 1) provide a standardized approach and evaluation framework for programs seeking to strategically implement and expand population-based approaches for identifying individuals and families at high risk of serious, yet preventable disease, 2) provide generalizable methods and knowledge about PGS, and 3) support efforts to bring the promise of precision health to all.
Studietyp
Observationell
Inskrivning (Beräknad)
8
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studiekontakt
- Namn: Caitlin Allen, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 614-554-5298
- E-post: Caitlin.Allen@wfusm.edu
Studieorter
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Förenta staterna, 27599
- University of North Carolina
-
Kontakt:
- Megan Roberts
- Telefonnummer: 919-962-2211
- E-post: megan.roberts@unc.edu
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, Förenta staterna, 27401
- Moses Cone Hospital
-
Kontakt:
- Alison Sigmon
- Telefonnummer: 919-962-2211
- E-post: alison.sigmon@conehealth.com
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Förenta staterna, 27157
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
-
Kontakt:
- Lori Orlando
- Telefonnummer: 704-863-6000
- E-post: Lori.Orlando@wfusm.edu
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Förenta staterna, 18015
- St. Luke's University Hospital
-
Kontakt:
- Christopher Chapman
- Telefonnummer: 866-785-8537
- E-post: Christopher.Chapman@sluhn.org
-
York, Pennsylvania, Förenta staterna, 17403
- WellSpan York Hospital
-
Kontakt:
- Anwar Chahal
- Telefonnummer: 717-851-2345
- E-post: cchahal@wellspan.org
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Förenta staterna, 77030
- Baylor College of Medicine
-
Kontakt:
- Kyler Godwin
- Telefonnummer: 713-798-4951
- E-post: Kyler.Godwin@bcm.edu
-
Houston, Texas, Förenta staterna, 77030
- Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center
-
Kontakt:
- Farhaan Vahidy
- Telefonnummer: 713-704-4000
- E-post: Farhaan.Vahidy@memorialhermann.org
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
- Barn
- Vuxen
- Äldre vuxen
Tar emot friska volontärer
Ja
Testmetod
Sannolikhetsprov
Studera befolkning
This study will include specific sites population genomic screening (PGS) rather than individual participants.
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Operate an active or population genomic screening (PGS) program.
- Agree to utilize the FOCUS Toolkit throughout the trial and engage staff in its use and fidelity tracking.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a data use agreement and comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study.
- Ability to provide program-level data (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) quarterly.
- Confirmation of implementing or sustaining stage, as determined by the investigator.
- Capacity to participate in stakeholder surveys and interviews at study conclusion.
- Ability to read and understand the English language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- They lack infrastructure to collect and share required data.
- They cannot commit to toolkit use or quarterly reporting.
- They are unable to comply with study timelines
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter och interventioner
Grupp / Kohort |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
FOCUS Toolkit
|
The FOCUS toolkit is a multicomponent implementation guide on improving the implementation of population-wide genomic screening programs across diverse healthcare settings.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Tidsram: Month 4
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 4
|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Tidsram: Month 10
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 10
|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Tidsram: Month 16
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Tidsram: Month 4
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Tidsram: Month 10
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Tidsram: Month 16
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Tidsram: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Number of Sites Participating in PGS
Tidsram: Month 19
|
Adoption is defined as the uptake of population-based genomic screening (PGS) at each site, measured by the number of sites participating in PGS relative to those eligible.
Measured through stakeholder surveys
|
Month 19
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Tidsram: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure survey includes 4 items with the total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of acceptability.
|
Month 19
|
|
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Tidsram: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure survey includes 4 items with a total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of appropriateness.
|
Month 19
|
|
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Tidsram: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure survey includes 4 items with a total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of feasibility.
|
Month 19
|
|
Number of Individuals that Completed High-Risk Management
Tidsram: Month 19
|
Maintenance will be assessed by the number of individuals with positive results that completed high-risk management
|
Month 19
|
|
Program Sustainability Assessment
Tidsram: Month 19
|
Maintenance will be assessed by using the Program Sustainability Assessment survey has 40 items with a total score range of 40-280.
Higher scores indicate greater sustainability capacity.
|
Month 19
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Caitlin Allen, PhD, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Beräknad)
1 januari 2027
Primärt slutförande (Beräknad)
1 oktober 2028
Avslutad studie (Beräknad)
1 oktober 2028
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
2 september 2026
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
2 september 2026
Första postat (Faktisk)
8 september 2026
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
8 september 2026
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
2 september 2026
Senast verifierad
1 augusti 2026
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- IRB00143953
- R01HG013851-03 (U.S.S. NIH-anslag/kontrakt)
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
NEJ
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Nej
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Nej
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .