- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT07806643
Facilitating the Implementation of Population-wide Genomic Screening (FOCUS)
2. september 2026 oppdatert av: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
This is a multi-site hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that uses a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design to evaluate the impact of the FOCUS toolkit, a multicomponent implementation guide, on improving the implementation of population-wide genomic screening (PGS) programs across diverse healthcare settings.
The trial will assess program-level outcomes using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and explore mechanisms of change and implementation process progression.
The study involves program-level and individual-level data collection and will not alter clinical care or treatment decisions of individuals made by participating sites.
Studieoversikt
Status
Har ikke rekruttert ennå
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
To help facilitate growth of population-wide genomic screening (PGS) programs and enhance recruitment and retention of representative populations into genomic initiatives, this study propose to identify best practices for PGS implementation and develop and test a freely available, online multicomponent implementation guide (FOCUS toolkit).
This project will establish a gold standard approach for integrating PGS and offer the field generalizable methods and knowledge about PGS implementation.
Specifically, using a stakeholder-engaged Implementation Mapping approach we will: 1) conduct a qualitative needs assessment among ten PGS programs (FOCUS design sites) at various implementation stages (emerging, implementing, sustaining) guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, 2) develop and produce the FOCUS toolkit consisting of implementation strategies, materials, and protocols, and 3) evaluate the impact of the FOCUS toolkit on Reach, Effectiveness, Implementation, Adoption, Maintenance outcomes for PGS in 12 PGS sites (FOCUS test sites) using a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
These findings will: 1) provide a standardized approach and evaluation framework for programs seeking to strategically implement and expand population-based approaches for identifying individuals and families at high risk of serious, yet preventable disease, 2) provide generalizable methods and knowledge about PGS, and 3) support efforts to bring the promise of precision health to all.
Studietype
Observasjonsmessig
Registrering (Antatt)
8
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Caitlin Allen, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 614-554-5298
- E-post: Caitlin.Allen@wfusm.edu
Studiesteder
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27599
- University of North Carolina
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Megan Roberts
- Telefonnummer: 919-962-2211
- E-post: megan.roberts@unc.edu
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27401
- Moses Cone Hospital
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Alison Sigmon
- Telefonnummer: 919-962-2211
- E-post: alison.sigmon@conehealth.com
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27157
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Lori Orlando
- Telefonnummer: 704-863-6000
- E-post: Lori.Orlando@wfusm.edu
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Forente stater, 18015
- St. Luke's University Hospital
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Christopher Chapman
- Telefonnummer: 866-785-8537
- E-post: Christopher.Chapman@sluhn.org
-
York, Pennsylvania, Forente stater, 17403
- WellSpan York Hospital
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Anwar Chahal
- Telefonnummer: 717-851-2345
- E-post: cchahal@wellspan.org
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Forente stater, 77030
- Baylor College of Medicine
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Kyler Godwin
- Telefonnummer: 713-798-4951
- E-post: Kyler.Godwin@bcm.edu
-
Houston, Texas, Forente stater, 77030
- Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Farhaan Vahidy
- Telefonnummer: 713-704-4000
- E-post: Farhaan.Vahidy@memorialhermann.org
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Barn
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Ja
Prøvetakingsmetode
Sannsynlighetsprøve
Studiepopulasjon
This study will include specific sites population genomic screening (PGS) rather than individual participants.
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Operate an active or population genomic screening (PGS) program.
- Agree to utilize the FOCUS Toolkit throughout the trial and engage staff in its use and fidelity tracking.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a data use agreement and comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study.
- Ability to provide program-level data (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) quarterly.
- Confirmation of implementing or sustaining stage, as determined by the investigator.
- Capacity to participate in stakeholder surveys and interviews at study conclusion.
- Ability to read and understand the English language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- They lack infrastructure to collect and share required data.
- They cannot commit to toolkit use or quarterly reporting.
- They are unable to comply with study timelines
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter og intervensjoner
Gruppe / Kohort |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
FOCUS Toolkit
|
The FOCUS toolkit is a multicomponent implementation guide on improving the implementation of population-wide genomic screening programs across diverse healthcare settings.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Tidsramme: Month 4
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 4
|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Tidsramme: Month 10
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 10
|
|
Number of People Participating in PGS Program
Tidsramme: Month 16
|
Reach is measured as the total number of people who have consented to participate in the population-based genomic screening (PGS) program.
Data will be collected from PGS program data collection form
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Tidsramme: Month 4
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Tidsramme: Month 10
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Eligible Individuals Tested
Tidsramme: Month 16
|
Effectiveness is measured as the proportion of eligible individuals tested compared to those consented
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Positive Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with positive results after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of Negative Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with negative results after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 4
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 4
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 10
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 10
|
|
Proportion of VUS Genomic Screening Results
Tidsramme: Month 16
|
Number of individuals with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) after genomic screening
|
Month 16
|
|
Number of Sites Participating in PGS
Tidsramme: Month 19
|
Adoption is defined as the uptake of population-based genomic screening (PGS) at each site, measured by the number of sites participating in PGS relative to those eligible.
Measured through stakeholder surveys
|
Month 19
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Tidsramme: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure survey includes 4 items with the total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of acceptability.
|
Month 19
|
|
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Tidsramme: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure survey includes 4 items with a total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of appropriateness.
|
Month 19
|
|
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Tidsramme: Month 19
|
Implementation will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure survey includes 4 items with a total score range 4-20.
Higher scores indicate higher level of feasibility.
|
Month 19
|
|
Number of Individuals that Completed High-Risk Management
Tidsramme: Month 19
|
Maintenance will be assessed by the number of individuals with positive results that completed high-risk management
|
Month 19
|
|
Program Sustainability Assessment
Tidsramme: Month 19
|
Maintenance will be assessed by using the Program Sustainability Assessment survey has 40 items with a total score range of 40-280.
Higher scores indicate greater sustainability capacity.
|
Month 19
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Samarbeidspartnere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Caitlin Allen, PhD, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Antatt)
1. januar 2027
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
1. oktober 2028
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
1. oktober 2028
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
2. september 2026
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
2. september 2026
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
8. september 2026
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
8. september 2026
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
2. september 2026
Sist bekreftet
1. august 2026
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Andre studie-ID-numre
- IRB00143953
- R01HG013851-03 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
NEI
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .