Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Galilei Lens Professional vs. Predicate Devices: a Comparison Study

26. september 2019 opdateret af: Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG

GALILEI Lens Professional vs. Predicate Devices: a Comparison Study

Study question: How does the new GALILEI Lens Professional compare to predicate devices? Study hypothesis: The GALILEI Lens Professional achieves a better precision in the postoperative, calculated target refraction with cataract surgeries than predicate devices, and it is more versatile in the measurable parameters as well as more user-friendly.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Background: An accessory to the commercially available GALILEI Dual-Scheimpflug Corneal Topographer/Keratometer with the name "EBR Accessory" was developed by the company Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG for the measurement of intraocular distances. The combination is called "GALILEI Lens Professional". The measurement principle is based on on short coherence interferometry/-reflectometry, which has gained wide-spread application and has been applied clinically, including one of the members of this study group, for the precise measurement of axial, intraocular distances (12.1.). Such EBR Accessory measurements, in combination with measurements by the GALILEI, may be applied to given intra-ocular lens (IOL) types and IOL equations, an permit the calculation of suggested IOLs that are implanted during cataract surgery, in order to achieve the desired vision correction. To register this accessory for sale, the precision and agreement to existing devices with similar applications ("predicate devices") must be demonstrated. One complete measurement consists of a cornea-topography/keratometry scan, followed immediately by three consecutive, axial biometry scans of the anterior segment (cornea and crystalline lens) and - after a short re-alignment - three consecutive, axial biometry scans of the retina. The measurement process is continuous, but divided in two steps. Blinking by the patient is possible in between the two steps, which increases patient comfort and, in certain cases, measurement success. Precision is evaluated by three repeated, complete measurements with the GALILEI Lens Professional and each predicate device. Two standard devices with comparable optical technology that are used in routine cataract surgery were declared as predicate devices. These two devise are typically used in combination with standard keratometers, as which the GALILEI Lens Professional may be employed as well.

Goal: The comparison of the GALILEI Lens Professional to predicate devices with respect to precision in measuring postoperative, calculated target refractions in cataract patients, and versatility of measurable quantities.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

40

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Aargau
      • Reinach, Aargau, Schweiz, 5734
        • Eye Clinic Orasis

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • spherical equivalent between -10 D and +10 D
  • best-corrected VA of 20/100 or better.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • strabism
  • blepharitis
  • nystagmus
  • amblyopia
  • anisometropia (spherical equivalent > 1D)
  • angle closure glaucoma
  • seizure disorder
  • brain damages
  • Down syndrome
  • trisomy 13 or 18
  • cerebral palsy
  • other serious disorders of the eye or central nervous systems

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Diagnostisk
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Normal
Arm: Normal eyes Interventions: Galilei Lens Professional, IOLMaster, Lenstar
Measurement device
Measurement device
Measurement device
Aktiv komparator: Mild Cataract
Arm: Eyes with mild cataract Interventions: Galilei Lens Professional, IOLMaster, Lenstar
Measurement device
Measurement device
Measurement device
Eksperimentel: Severe cataract
Arm: Eyes with severe cataract Interventions: Galilei Lens Professional, IOLMaster, Lenstar
Measurement device
Measurement device
Measurement device

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Agreement With Predicate Devices in Terms of Agreement 1
Tidsramme: 3 months

Assessed parameters:

Axial Length (AL; G6, IOLM, LS) Central Corneal Thickness (CCT; G6, LS)) Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD; G6, IOLM, LS) Lens Thickness (LT; G6, LS) Corneal Curvature (SimK; G6, IOLM, LS) White-to-White (WtW; G6, IOL, LS)

3 months
Agreement With Predicate Devices in Terms of Agreement 2
Tidsramme: 3 months

Assessed Parameters:

Simulated Corneal Curvature (SimK; G6, IOLM, LS)

3 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Agreement With Devices of the Same Type in Terms of Repeatability
Tidsramme: 3 months

Assessed parameters:

Axial Length (AL) Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) Lens Thickness (LT) Corneal Curvature (SimK) White-to-White (WtW)

3 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Bojan Pajic, MD, Eye Clinic Orasis

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. oktober 2013

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. december 2013

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. december 2013

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

7. oktober 2013

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

10. oktober 2013

Først opslået (Skøn)

11. oktober 2013

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

8. oktober 2019

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

26. september 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. september 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • ZIOS-13/01

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner