Galilei Lens Professional vs. Predicate Devices: a Comparison Study

September 26, 2019 updated by: Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG

GALILEI Lens Professional vs. Predicate Devices: a Comparison Study

Study question: How does the new GALILEI Lens Professional compare to predicate devices? Study hypothesis: The GALILEI Lens Professional achieves a better precision in the postoperative, calculated target refraction with cataract surgeries than predicate devices, and it is more versatile in the measurable parameters as well as more user-friendly.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: An accessory to the commercially available GALILEI Dual-Scheimpflug Corneal Topographer/Keratometer with the name "EBR Accessory" was developed by the company Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG for the measurement of intraocular distances. The combination is called "GALILEI Lens Professional". The measurement principle is based on on short coherence interferometry/-reflectometry, which has gained wide-spread application and has been applied clinically, including one of the members of this study group, for the precise measurement of axial, intraocular distances (12.1.). Such EBR Accessory measurements, in combination with measurements by the GALILEI, may be applied to given intra-ocular lens (IOL) types and IOL equations, an permit the calculation of suggested IOLs that are implanted during cataract surgery, in order to achieve the desired vision correction. To register this accessory for sale, the precision and agreement to existing devices with similar applications ("predicate devices") must be demonstrated. One complete measurement consists of a cornea-topography/keratometry scan, followed immediately by three consecutive, axial biometry scans of the anterior segment (cornea and crystalline lens) and - after a short re-alignment - three consecutive, axial biometry scans of the retina. The measurement process is continuous, but divided in two steps. Blinking by the patient is possible in between the two steps, which increases patient comfort and, in certain cases, measurement success. Precision is evaluated by three repeated, complete measurements with the GALILEI Lens Professional and each predicate device. Two standard devices with comparable optical technology that are used in routine cataract surgery were declared as predicate devices. These two devise are typically used in combination with standard keratometers, as which the GALILEI Lens Professional may be employed as well.

Goal: The comparison of the GALILEI Lens Professional to predicate devices with respect to precision in measuring postoperative, calculated target refractions in cataract patients, and versatility of measurable quantities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Aargau
      • Reinach, Aargau, Switzerland, 5734
        • Eye Clinic Orasis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • spherical equivalent between -10 D and +10 D
  • best-corrected VA of 20/100 or better.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • strabism
  • blepharitis
  • nystagmus
  • amblyopia
  • anisometropia (spherical equivalent > 1D)
  • angle closure glaucoma
  • seizure disorder
  • brain damages
  • Down syndrome
  • trisomy 13 or 18
  • cerebral palsy
  • other serious disorders of the eye or central nervous systems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Normal
Arm: Normal eyes Interventions: Galilei Lens Professional, IOLMaster, Lenstar
Measurement device
Measurement device
Measurement device
Active Comparator: Mild Cataract
Arm: Eyes with mild cataract Interventions: Galilei Lens Professional, IOLMaster, Lenstar
Measurement device
Measurement device
Measurement device
Experimental: Severe cataract
Arm: Eyes with severe cataract Interventions: Galilei Lens Professional, IOLMaster, Lenstar
Measurement device
Measurement device
Measurement device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement With Predicate Devices in Terms of Agreement 1
Time Frame: 3 months

Assessed parameters:

Axial Length (AL; G6, IOLM, LS) Central Corneal Thickness (CCT; G6, LS)) Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD; G6, IOLM, LS) Lens Thickness (LT; G6, LS) Corneal Curvature (SimK; G6, IOLM, LS) White-to-White (WtW; G6, IOL, LS)

3 months
Agreement With Predicate Devices in Terms of Agreement 2
Time Frame: 3 months

Assessed Parameters:

Simulated Corneal Curvature (SimK; G6, IOLM, LS)

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement With Devices of the Same Type in Terms of Repeatability
Time Frame: 3 months

Assessed parameters:

Axial Length (AL) Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) Lens Thickness (LT) Corneal Curvature (SimK) White-to-White (WtW)

3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bojan Pajic, MD, Eye Clinic Orasis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZIOS-13/01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Galilei Lens Professional

Subscribe