The Accuracy of Direct Digital Intra-oral Scanning Measurements Compared to Measurements on Study Models
23. september 2015 opdateret af: Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of measurements derived from a commercially available direct intra-oral scanning system with those taken from plaster study models, and to compare cost implications of both systems.
The investigators will test the hypotheses:
- There is no systematic difference between measurements taken from the Trios scanner and study models.
- There is no difference in the cost of producing digital models.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Plaster study models produced from moulds of the teeth are a standard component of orthodontic records.
They are fundamental to diagnosis and treatment planning, evaluation of treatment progress and results as well as record keeping.
(Santoro et al., 2003) Plaster models must be retained for a minimum of 11 years for a medico legal reasons.
This leads to problems of storage in terms of space and cost, in addition to the risk of damage because of the brittle nature of the models.
These problems therefore highlight the need for an alternative method for producing and storing study models.
This study aims to compare the accuracy of measurements derived from a new commercially available direct intra-oral (inside of the mouth) scanning system (3Shape TRIOS (R)) with those taken from plaster study models, and to compare cost implications of both systems.
We will use the results to conclude whether direct intra¬oral scanning can replace traditional plaster models produced from moulds of the teeth.
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
22
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Northamptonshire
-
Kettering, Northamptonshire, Det Forenede Kongerige, NN16 8UZ
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
11 år til 18 år (Barn, Voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age range 11 years old to 18 years old.
- Orthodontic patients with a range of malocclusions.
- Dentition without abnormal morphology.
- Adult/permanent dentition from the first molar to first molar in both arches.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients under 11 years old and over 18 years old.
- Carious teeth or teeth with significantly altered anatomy.
- Periodontal disease with significant gingival swelling.
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
- Tildeling: N/A
- Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Andet: Cohort
Orthodontic patients, aged 11-18 who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria and provide written informed consent to participate will undergo intra-oral scan.
This will be repeated 2 weeks later.
|
Direct intra-oral scan of teeth and dentition
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Measurement of tooth widths, arch lengths, overjet, overbite, crown heights and labio lingual widths
Tidsramme: Within six weeks of initial intervention
|
All dental study models, and 3D scans will have all the above measurements carried out. There are 22 patients and each will have had study models made and these will be measured twice on two separate occasions, and all scans measured twice. The measurements will be compared and analysed to see if the 3D scans accurately represent the tooth sizes and measurements that have been carried out on the dental study models (gold standard). |
Within six weeks of initial intervention
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost
Tidsramme: within 6 months of initial intervention
|
To determine the difference in cost between the two systems
|
within 6 months of initial intervention
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Samarbejdspartnere
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Julian O'Neill, BDS FFDRCS MOrth, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Publikationer og nyttige links
Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.
Generelle publikationer
- Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):101-5. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00152-5.
- Han UK, Vig KW, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Sep;100(3):212-9. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70058-5.
- Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):300-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[300:AEOTUO]2.0.CO;2.
- Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Feb;14(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
- Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Sep;142(3):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031.
- Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod. 2003 Sep;30(3):219-23. doi: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.219.
- Lee SP, Delong R, Hodges JS, Hayashi K, Lee JB. Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches. Clin Anat. 2008 Jan;21(1):27-32. doi: 10.1002/ca.20580.
- Machen DE. Legal aspects of orthodontic practice: risk management concepts. The diagnostic dilemma. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Apr;99(4):381-2. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81419-2. No abstract available.
- Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):351-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)0712.0.CO;2.
- Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003 Jun;73(3):301-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)0732.0.CO;2.
- Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):298-303. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2008 Nov;42(11):625-40. No abstract available.
- Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):431-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.035.
- Pani SC, Hedge AM. Impressions in cleft lip and palate--a novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Winter;33(2):93-6.
- Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.028.
- Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010 May;38(5):323-30.
- Meyer BJ, Mormann WH, Lutz F. [Optimization of the powder application in the Cerec method with environment-friendly propellant systems]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(12):1462-8. German.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart
1. december 2014
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
1. januar 2015
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
1. august 2015
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
28. januar 2015
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
10. februar 2015
Først opslået (Skøn)
18. februar 2015
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)
24. september 2015
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
23. september 2015
Sidst verificeret
1. september 2015
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- Rdb394 v6.1
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .