Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Glottic Views and Intubation Times in the Supine and 25 Degree Back-up Positions

5. april 2017 opdateret af: Raj M Reddy, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

The sniffing position has traditionally been considered the optimal head position for direct laryngoscopy and is the usual patient position preferred by most anaesthetists. In theory, neck flexion aligns the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes, and head extension at the atlanto-occipital joint aligns the oral axis with these two axes allowing the line of sight to fall on the glottis. It is recognized as the starting head position for direct laryngoscopy because it provides the best chance of adequate exposure.

However the sniffing position does not guarantee adequate exposure in all patients because many other anatomical factors control the final degree of visualization.

To achieve a proper sniffing position in obese patients, the "ramped" (or the back-up) position has been used as this produces better neck flexion and head extension in these patients when compared to the horizontal supine position. Also the forces required to elevate and move the tongue and other tissues out of the line of sight are less when the patients are ramped.

Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all (ie not only obese) patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

781

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult surgical patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients less than 18 years old,
  2. Patients recognised to have difficult airways where an alternative method of intubation (e.g. fibre optic) was the method of choice,
  3. Patients undergoing emergency surgery where patient positioning and data collection might cause delay (e.g. exsanguinating patients) or where the supine position is not optimal (e.g. brisk bleeding into the upper airway),
  4. Patients requiring rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Supine
A baseline group of adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia who were intubated in the standard horizontal sniffing position.
Back-up
A subsequent group of similar the patients who had their anaesthesia induced and tracheas intubated in a 25 degree back-up position achieved by flexion of the operating table at the hips
To test whether a 25 degree back-up position improves laryngeal views and makes intubation easier compared to the standard horizontal position

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The Best Glottic View Obtained During Laryngoscopy
Tidsramme: The view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubated

The best glottic view obtained during laryngoscopy was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane classification by the anaesthetist performing the laryngoscopy.

The Cormack and Lehane classifies glottic views as follows: Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible, Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen., Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible, Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible.

The view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubated

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation
Tidsramme: Once at intubation
The number of attempts at both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were recorded
Once at intubation
The Use of Ancillary Equipment
Tidsramme: Once at intubation
The use of ancillary equipment (e.g. bougie, alternative laryngoscope blades) and manoeuvres (e.g. laryngeal manipulation) were recorded but applied at the intubating anaesthetist's discretion
Once at intubation
The Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitor
Tidsramme: Once at intubation
The time between the beginning of laryngoscopy and detection of carbon dioxide on the end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor after the successful placement of the tracheal tube was recorded
Once at intubation

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Raj M Reddy, FRCA, Anaesthetic Department, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. november 2014

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. januar 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

13. oktober 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

13. oktober 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

17. oktober 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

11. maj 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

5. april 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. april 2017

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • BetsiCUHB

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Publish anonymised raw data as supplementary file

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner