Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Glottic Views and Intubation Times in the Supine and 25 Degree Back-up Positions

5. april 2017 oppdatert av: Raj M Reddy, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Detaljert beskrivelse

The sniffing position has traditionally been considered the optimal head position for direct laryngoscopy and is the usual patient position preferred by most anaesthetists. In theory, neck flexion aligns the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes, and head extension at the atlanto-occipital joint aligns the oral axis with these two axes allowing the line of sight to fall on the glottis. It is recognized as the starting head position for direct laryngoscopy because it provides the best chance of adequate exposure.

However the sniffing position does not guarantee adequate exposure in all patients because many other anatomical factors control the final degree of visualization.

To achieve a proper sniffing position in obese patients, the "ramped" (or the back-up) position has been used as this produces better neck flexion and head extension in these patients when compared to the horizontal supine position. Also the forces required to elevate and move the tongue and other tissues out of the line of sight are less when the patients are ramped.

Our hypothesis is that the view of the glottis may be improved by putting all (ie not only obese) patients requiring intubation in the ramped or back up position while maintaining the classic sniffing position.

Studietype

Observasjonsmessig

Registrering (Faktiske)

781

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Prøvetakingsmetode

Ikke-sannsynlighetsprøve

Studiepopulasjon

Adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult surgical patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients less than 18 years old,
  2. Patients recognised to have difficult airways where an alternative method of intubation (e.g. fibre optic) was the method of choice,
  3. Patients undergoing emergency surgery where patient positioning and data collection might cause delay (e.g. exsanguinating patients) or where the supine position is not optimal (e.g. brisk bleeding into the upper airway),
  4. Patients requiring rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

Kohorter og intervensjoner

Gruppe / Kohort
Intervensjon / Behandling
Supine
A baseline group of adult patients who required intubation as part of their routine anaesthesia who were intubated in the standard horizontal sniffing position.
Back-up
A subsequent group of similar the patients who had their anaesthesia induced and tracheas intubated in a 25 degree back-up position achieved by flexion of the operating table at the hips
To test whether a 25 degree back-up position improves laryngeal views and makes intubation easier compared to the standard horizontal position

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The Best Glottic View Obtained During Laryngoscopy
Tidsramme: The view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubated

The best glottic view obtained during laryngoscopy was assessed using the Cormack and Lehane classification by the anaesthetist performing the laryngoscopy.

The Cormack and Lehane classifies glottic views as follows: Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible, Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen., Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible, Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible.

The view of the glottis was measured once while the patient was being intubated

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The Number of Attempts at Both Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation
Tidsramme: Once at intubation
The number of attempts at both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were recorded
Once at intubation
The Use of Ancillary Equipment
Tidsramme: Once at intubation
The use of ancillary equipment (e.g. bougie, alternative laryngoscope blades) and manoeuvres (e.g. laryngeal manipulation) were recorded but applied at the intubating anaesthetist's discretion
Once at intubation
The Time Between the Beginning of Laryngoscopy and Detection of Carbon Dioxide on the End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitor
Tidsramme: Once at intubation
The time between the beginning of laryngoscopy and detection of carbon dioxide on the end-tidal carbon dioxide monitor after the successful placement of the tracheal tube was recorded
Once at intubation

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Raj M Reddy, FRCA, Anaesthetic Department, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2012

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. november 2014

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. januar 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

13. oktober 2016

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

13. oktober 2016

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

17. oktober 2016

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

11. mai 2017

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

5. april 2017

Sist bekreftet

1. april 2017

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • BetsiCUHB

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Publish anonymised raw data as supplementary file

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere