Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Differential Learning Enhances Motor Performance and Retention in Sport Science Students (DL_BP_RCT)

3. juni 2026 opdateret af: Kais Elabed, The Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax

Differential Learning Enhances Motor Performance and Retention in Sport Science Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial compared differential learning (DL) versus blocked practice (BP) on motor performance and retention in 100 sport science students. Participants performed a table tennis topspin serve. DL involved continuous movement variations without corrective feedback; BP involved repetition with corrective feedback. Outcomes included accuracy (Euclidean distance) and movement variability (ApEn). Assessments at baseline, post-intervention (after 6 sessions over 3 weeks), and 7-day retention.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

A two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial. One hundred undergraduate sport science students (age 18-25 years) were randomly assigned to differential learning (DL, n=50) or blocked practice (BP, n=50). The DL group performed a table tennis topspin serve with continuous pseudo-random variations across five movement dimensions (stance, backswing amplitude, execution speed, trunk rotation, wrist action) without corrective feedback. The BP group repeated a standardized movement pattern with trial-by-trial corrective feedback. Both groups completed six training sessions over three weeks (two sessions per week, 45 min each). Motor performance (accuracy measured as Euclidean distance from target center) was assessed at baseline, post-intervention (within 48h), and retention (7 days later). Movement variability was quantified using approximate entropy (ApEn) from kinematic data. Theoretical knowledge of motor learning was assessed as a potential moderator. Linear mixed-effects models, moderation analysis, and mediation analysis (bootstrapping) were performed. The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

100

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Sfax, Tunesien, 3000
        • Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax (ISSEP Sfax)

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergraduate sport science student
  • Age 18 to 25 years
  • Physically active but non-expert in table tennis (less than 2 hours per week of structured practice in the past year)
  • Absence of self-reported musculoskeletal injury affecting upper or lower limbs
  • No known neurological or sleep disorders
  • No use of medication affecting motor or cognitive function
  • No irregular sleep schedules

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Regular table tennis competition
  • Injury preventing practice
  • Known sleep disorder
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Grundvidenskab
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Differential Learning Group
Participants performed table tennis topspin serve with continuous variations across five movement dimensions (stance, backswing amplitude, execution speed, trunk rotation, wrist action) without corrective feedback.
Participants performed table tennis topspin serve with continuous pseudo-random variations across five movement dimensions (stance, backswing amplitude, execution speed, trunk rotation, wrist action) without corrective feedback.
Aktiv komparator: Blocked Practice Group
Participants repeated a standardized movement pattern with trial-by-trial corrective feedback focusing on consistency and accuracy.
Participants repeated a standardized movement pattern with trial-by-trial corrective feedback focusing on consistency and accuracy.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Motor Performance (Accuracy)
Tidsramme: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (after 3 weeks), and 7-day retention
Euclidean distance (in cm) between the ball's first landing point and the center of the target area during a table tennis topspin serve.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (after 3 weeks), and 7-day retention

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Movement Variability
Tidsramme: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (after 3 weeks), and 7-day retention
Approximate entropy (ApEn) derived from kinematic time-series data recorded during each trial. Higher ApEn values indicate greater movement complexity and adaptability.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (after 3 weeks), and 7-day retention

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Kais El Abed, Phd, University of Sfax, Tunisia

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

  • Chmara P, Brzykcy A, Brazevic S, Jozwiak M. Habitual Physical Activity and Walking Endurance Following Inpatient Rehabilitation in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Cureus. 2026;18(5):e109862.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

2. juni 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

30. juni 2025

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

30. juni 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

30. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

3. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

5. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

5. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

3. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • ISSEP_DL_BP_2025

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Sund frivillig undersøgelse

Kliniske forsøg med Differential Learning

Abonner