Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

High-Fidelity Simulation in Vaccination Training

24. juni 2026 opdateret af: Signem ANOL KILIÇ, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

The Effect of High-fidelity Simulation on Childhood Vaccination Training in Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compared the impact of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) versus standart laboratory practice (SLP) on nursing students' knowledge, psychomotor skills, learning satisfaction, and self-confidence within a childhood vaccination training.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) versus standard laboratory practice (SLP) on nursing students' knowledge, psychomotor skills, satisfaction, and self-confidence in childhood vaccination training. A total of 122 fourth-year nursing students were randomly assigned to HFS or SLP groups; 104 completed the study.

All participants received the same theoretical training on childhood immunization. The HFS group participated in a simulation scenario involving vaccine hesitancy, while the SLP group performed traditional laboratory-based practice on a manikin.

Knowledge was assessed using a pre-test, post-test at 1 hour, and a one-month follow-up test. Skills were evaluated immediately after the intervention. Satisfaction and self-confidence were also measured post-intervention.

The primary outcomes were knowledge and skill performance, while secondary outcomes included satisfaction and self-confidence. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

104

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Tyrkiet (Türkiye)
    • Zonguldak Province
      • Kozlu, Zonguldak Province, Tyrkiet (Türkiye), 67600
        • Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fourth-year nursing students
  • Voluntary participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not complete post-tests
  • Non-volunteering

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: High-Fidelity Simulation Group (HFS)
The HFS intervention was developed in accordance with INACSL Healthcare Simulation Standards and validated by six nursing experts. All participants first received a standardized 100-minute childhood vaccination training consisting of theoretical instruction and laboratory practice. The simulation session included a 10-minute briefing, a 20-minute high-fidelity scenario involving a vaccine-hesitant mother, and a 30-minute structured debriefing using the PEARLS framework. During the simulation, students were required to assess parental concerns, provide education, safely administer vaccines, and complete documentation. The debriefing process included reflection and analysis through structured phases to enhance learning outcomes.
Adfærdsmæssigt: High-Fidelity Simulation
High-fidelity simulation-based training including a vaccine hesitancy scenario, structured briefing, simulation, and debriefing.
Aktiv komparator: Standard Laboratory Practice Group (SLP)
The SLP group received the identical 100-minute theoretical and practical training session. One week later, instead of a structured simulation, they participated in a 20-minute individual skills session in the nursing fundamentals laboratory. Each student independently performed the vaccination procedure on a baby manikin and verbally described the parent education they would provide. Following their session, each student also participated in an individual, video-assisted PEARLS debriefing focused on their technical performance and communication description.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Standard Laboratory Practice
Traditional laboratory-based vaccination training using a manikin without a structured simulation scenario.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Childhood Immunization Knowledge Test (CIKT)
Tidsramme: Baseline, 1 hour after training, and 1 month after training
A 10-item multiple-choice test developed by the researchers based on national guidelines and literature. Each correct answer is scored as 10 points. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of childhood immunization. Expert validation was obtained, and the KR-20 reliability coefficient was 0.93.
Baseline, 1 hour after training, and 1 month after training
Pediatric Intramuscular Vaccination Administration Checklist (PIVAC)
Tidsramme: 1 hour after training
Items are scored from 0 (not performed) to 2 (performed). Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better pediatric intramuscular vaccination administration skills. The checklist demonstrated expert validity and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90.
1 hour after training

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS)
Tidsramme: 1 hour after training
A validated 12-item, 5-point Likert scale with two subscales (Satisfaction and Self-Confidence). Total scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. In this study, Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 for the satisfaction subscale, 0.94 for the self-confidence subscale, and 0.96 for the total scale.
1 hour after training
Simulation Design Scale (SDS)
Tidsramme: 1 hour after training
The Simulation Design Scale consists of 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating a more positive evaluation of the simulation design. Cronbach's alpha was 0.98.
1 hour after training

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. november 2022

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. januar 2023

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. januar 2023

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

21. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

24. juni 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

1. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

24. juni 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 205926

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner