Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Standard Closure vs. Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) for Incisional Hernia Repair (IMFC)

8. oktober 2026 opdateret af: Bovino Mattano Facundo, Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Mario V Larrain

Prospective Comparative Evaluation of the Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) Technique Versus Standard Closure of the Abdominal Wall: A Quasi-Experimental, Non-Randomized Study

This study compares two surgical techniques for closing the abdominal wall in adult patients who have an incisional hernia (a weakness or opening in a previous surgical incision) or who require prophylactic mesh placement during a laparotomy.

In one group, the abdominal wall is closed using the standard technique, in which a polypropylene mesh is fixed independently from the fascial suture. In the other group, Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) is used, a standardized execution of the technique of mesh incorporation into the fascial closure described by Jamal et al (Hernia, 2013).

The choice of technique is made by the patient after receiving information about both options and providing informed consent. Participants will be followed clinically and with imaging for 18 to 24 months to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility, and reproducibility of the IMFC technique, and to determine the incidence of hernia recurrence in both groups.

Studieoversigt

Status

Rekruttering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Incisional hernia is one of the most frequent complications of abdominal surgery, with a reported incidence of 10-20% after laparotomy, and recurrence rates after mesh repair reaching 20-30% in long-term follow-up. In conventional techniques, primary fascial closure and mesh fixation are performed as two mechanically independent steps, concentrating tension on the suture line during the acute postoperative period.

The Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) technique integrates a macroporous polypropylene mesh within a continuous fascial suture line (pattern: mesh → right fascial edge → left fascial edge → mesh), aiming to distribute tensile load simultaneously between the fascia and the prosthesis, potentially reducing the incidence of hernia recurrence compared to standard closure. The principle of incorporating the mesh into the fascial closure was described by Jamal et al in a retrospective series of 72 patients. IMFC standardizes its execution (suture material, 5-mm bites in mesh and fascia, anchoring of the suture line in healthy aponeurosis, and optional minimal peripheral fixation) and evaluates it prospectively against standard closure.

This is a prospective, comparative, quasi-experimental (non-randomized) study conducted at a single center (Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain," Berisso, Argentina). Eligible patients choose, after informed consent, between standard mesh closure (Group A) or IMFC (Group B). Both groups follow the same clinical and imaging follow-up schedule (days 7, 15, 30; months 2, 6, 12, 18; and a final visit between 18 and 24 months).

The study is designed as an initial, hypothesis-generating comparison of safety, technical feasibility, and reproducibility across surgeons, intended to support a future randomized trial.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

60

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

  • Navn: Emiliano D Gargiulo, MD
  • Telefonnummer: +54 2215371371

Studiesteder

  • Argentina
    • Buenos Aires
      • Berisso, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1923
        • Rekruttering
        • Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
          • Emiliano D Gargiulo, MD
          • Telefonnummer: +54 9 221 5371371

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults older than 18 years of age
  • Patients with incisional (ventral) hernia
  • Patients with recurrent incisional hernia
  • Incisional hernias with a diameter greater than 4 cm
  • Patients undergoing laparotomy with an indication for prophylactic mesh placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active surgical site infection
  • Overt abdominal contamination
  • Tissue necrosis or inability to achieve primary fascial closure
  • Non-correctable loss of domain
  • Pregnant women or women of childbearing potential planning pregnancy or not using contraception during the follow-up period
  • Patients belonging to vulnerable populations, in accordance with Law 15.462 and applicable ethical guidelines
  • Active oncologic disease (patients with a cured oncologic history may be included)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Standard Mesh Closure

Conventional fascial closure using a macroporous polypropylene mesh fixed independently from the closure suture
Procedure: Standard Fascial Closure with Mesh

Macroporous polypropylene mesh (FILAPROP™/MERIGROW™) plus non-absorbable polypropylene suture, placed using the conventional (independent) technique.
Eksperimentel: Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure - IMFC

Fascial closure using the Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) technique: the mesh is incorporated within the trajectory of a single continuous fascial suture (pattern: mesh → right fascial edge → left fascial edge → mesh
Procedure: Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure

Same materials integrated into a single continuous suture line using the IMFC technique.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Recurrence rate of incisional hernia
Tidsramme: 18-24 months (final follow-up visit)

Proportion of participants with hernia recurrence, assessed by clinical physical examination and abdominal wall ultrasound, performed in all participants at 6 months and at the final visit (18-24 months). All ultrasound evaluations performed by the same sonographer throughout the study; the sonographer is aware of study participation but blinded to the specific surgical technique (IMFC vs. standard closure) received by each participant.
18-24 months (final follow-up visit)
Rate of Major Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications
Tidsramme: Throughout study participation (up to 24 months)

Proportion of participants experiencing a serious adverse event (SAE), defined per ICH E6(R3) as death, a life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability, or an unplanned surgical reintervention. Postoperative complications additionally graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system (Grade I-V) to assess severity.
Throughout study participation (up to 24 months)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Operative time and fascial closure time
Tidsramme: Intraoperative (during the surgical procedure)

Total operative time (from skin incision to skin closure) and fascial closure time (from start to completion of the mesh-fascial suture line), both measured in minutes and recorded intraoperatively by the surgical team using the operating room clock.
Intraoperative (during the surgical procedure)
Postoperative Pain Assessed by the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11)
Tidsramme: Postoperative days 7, 15, and 30

Self-reported postoperative pain intensity measured using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11), an unabbreviated verbally- or visually-administered numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable." Higher scores indicate worse (more severe) pain. Assessed at rest.
Postoperative days 7, 15, and 30
Rate of Early Postoperative Complications (Infection, Seroma, Dehiscence, Hematoma)
Tidsramme: Up to 30 days postoperative

Proportion of participants with surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, or hematoma, identified by clinical examination at scheduled postoperative visits (days 7, 15, and 30) and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Up to 30 days postoperative
Total Direct Hospital Costs (ARS) Associated with Complications or Reoperations
Tidsramme: Up to 24 months (exploratory)

Total direct hospital costs, expressed in Argentine pesos (ARS), attributable to management of complications or unplanned reoperations, extracted from institutional administrative and billing records. Exploratory outcome; not powered for formal statistical comparison between groups.
Up to 24 months (exploratory)

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Mario V Larrain

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Facundo B Mattano, MD, Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

28. september 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

15. oktober 2030

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

15. oktober 2032

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

18. september 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

23. september 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

25. september 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

14. oktober 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

8. oktober 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. oktober 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • IMFC-HL-2026
  • DISPO-2026-226-GDEBA-DIYCTMSAL (Anden identifikator: Comisión Conjunta de Investigaciones en Salud (CCIS))

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner