Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Standard Closure vs. Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) for Incisional Hernia Repair (IMFC)

8 oktober 2026 bijgewerkt door: Bovino Mattano Facundo, Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Mario V Larrain

Prospective Comparative Evaluation of the Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) Technique Versus Standard Closure of the Abdominal Wall: A Quasi-Experimental, Non-Randomized Study

This study compares two surgical techniques for closing the abdominal wall in adult patients who have an incisional hernia (a weakness or opening in a previous surgical incision) or who require prophylactic mesh placement during a laparotomy.

In one group, the abdominal wall is closed using the standard technique, in which a polypropylene mesh is fixed independently from the fascial suture. In the other group, Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) is used, a standardized execution of the technique of mesh incorporation into the fascial closure described by Jamal et al (Hernia, 2013).

The choice of technique is made by the patient after receiving information about both options and providing informed consent. Participants will be followed clinically and with imaging for 18 to 24 months to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility, and reproducibility of the IMFC technique, and to determine the incidence of hernia recurrence in both groups.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Werving

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Incisional hernia is one of the most frequent complications of abdominal surgery, with a reported incidence of 10-20% after laparotomy, and recurrence rates after mesh repair reaching 20-30% in long-term follow-up. In conventional techniques, primary fascial closure and mesh fixation are performed as two mechanically independent steps, concentrating tension on the suture line during the acute postoperative period.

The Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) technique integrates a macroporous polypropylene mesh within a continuous fascial suture line (pattern: mesh → right fascial edge → left fascial edge → mesh), aiming to distribute tensile load simultaneously between the fascia and the prosthesis, potentially reducing the incidence of hernia recurrence compared to standard closure. The principle of incorporating the mesh into the fascial closure was described by Jamal et al in a retrospective series of 72 patients. IMFC standardizes its execution (suture material, 5-mm bites in mesh and fascia, anchoring of the suture line in healthy aponeurosis, and optional minimal peripheral fixation) and evaluates it prospectively against standard closure.

This is a prospective, comparative, quasi-experimental (non-randomized) study conducted at a single center (Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain," Berisso, Argentina). Eligible patients choose, after informed consent, between standard mesh closure (Group A) or IMFC (Group B). Both groups follow the same clinical and imaging follow-up schedule (days 7, 15, 30; months 2, 6, 12, 18; and a final visit between 18 and 24 months).

The study is designed as an initial, hypothesis-generating comparison of safety, technical feasibility, and reproducibility across surgeons, intended to support a future randomized trial.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

60

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Contact Back-up

  • Naam: Emiliano D Gargiulo, MD
  • Telefoonnummer: +54 2215371371

Studie Locaties

  • Argentinië
    • Buenos Aires
      • Berisso, Buenos Aires, Argentinië, 1923
        • Werving
        • Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Emiliano D Gargiulo, MD
          • Telefoonnummer: +54 9 221 5371371

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults older than 18 years of age
  • Patients with incisional (ventral) hernia
  • Patients with recurrent incisional hernia
  • Incisional hernias with a diameter greater than 4 cm
  • Patients undergoing laparotomy with an indication for prophylactic mesh placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active surgical site infection
  • Overt abdominal contamination
  • Tissue necrosis or inability to achieve primary fascial closure
  • Non-correctable loss of domain
  • Pregnant women or women of childbearing potential planning pregnancy or not using contraception during the follow-up period
  • Patients belonging to vulnerable populations, in accordance with Law 15.462 and applicable ethical guidelines
  • Active oncologic disease (patients with a cured oncologic history may be included)

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Niet-gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Actieve vergelijker: Standard Mesh Closure

Conventional fascial closure using a macroporous polypropylene mesh fixed independently from the closure suture
Procedure: Standard Fascial Closure with Mesh

Macroporous polypropylene mesh (FILAPROP™/MERIGROW™) plus non-absorbable polypropylene suture, placed using the conventional (independent) technique.
Experimenteel: Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure - IMFC

Fascial closure using the Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) technique: the mesh is incorporated within the trajectory of a single continuous fascial suture (pattern: mesh → right fascial edge → left fascial edge → mesh
Procedure: Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure

Same materials integrated into a single continuous suture line using the IMFC technique.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Recurrence rate of incisional hernia
Tijdsspanne: 18-24 months (final follow-up visit)

Proportion of participants with hernia recurrence, assessed by clinical physical examination and abdominal wall ultrasound, performed in all participants at 6 months and at the final visit (18-24 months). All ultrasound evaluations performed by the same sonographer throughout the study; the sonographer is aware of study participation but blinded to the specific surgical technique (IMFC vs. standard closure) received by each participant.
18-24 months (final follow-up visit)
Rate of Major Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications
Tijdsspanne: Throughout study participation (up to 24 months)

Proportion of participants experiencing a serious adverse event (SAE), defined per ICH E6(R3) as death, a life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability, or an unplanned surgical reintervention. Postoperative complications additionally graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system (Grade I-V) to assess severity.
Throughout study participation (up to 24 months)

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Operative time and fascial closure time
Tijdsspanne: Intraoperative (during the surgical procedure)

Total operative time (from skin incision to skin closure) and fascial closure time (from start to completion of the mesh-fascial suture line), both measured in minutes and recorded intraoperatively by the surgical team using the operating room clock.
Intraoperative (during the surgical procedure)
Postoperative Pain Assessed by the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11)
Tijdsspanne: Postoperative days 7, 15, and 30

Self-reported postoperative pain intensity measured using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11), an unabbreviated verbally- or visually-administered numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable." Higher scores indicate worse (more severe) pain. Assessed at rest.
Postoperative days 7, 15, and 30
Rate of Early Postoperative Complications (Infection, Seroma, Dehiscence, Hematoma)
Tijdsspanne: Up to 30 days postoperative

Proportion of participants with surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, or hematoma, identified by clinical examination at scheduled postoperative visits (days 7, 15, and 30) and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Up to 30 days postoperative
Total Direct Hospital Costs (ARS) Associated with Complications or Reoperations
Tijdsspanne: Up to 24 months (exploratory)

Total direct hospital costs, expressed in Argentine pesos (ARS), attributable to management of complications or unplanned reoperations, extracted from institutional administrative and billing records. Exploratory outcome; not powered for formal statistical comparison between groups.
Up to 24 months (exploratory)

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Mario V Larrain

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Facundo B Mattano, MD, Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

28 september 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

15 oktober 2030

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

15 oktober 2032

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

18 september 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

23 september 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

25 september 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

14 oktober 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

8 oktober 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 oktober 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • IMFC-HL-2026
  • DISPO-2026-226-GDEBA-DIYCTMSAL (Andere identificatie: Comisión Conjunta de Investigaciones en Salud (CCIS))

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren