Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Standard Closure vs. Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) for Incisional Hernia Repair (IMFC)

8 oktober 2026 uppdaterad av: Bovino Mattano Facundo, Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Mario V Larrain

Prospective Comparative Evaluation of the Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) Technique Versus Standard Closure of the Abdominal Wall: A Quasi-Experimental, Non-Randomized Study

This study compares two surgical techniques for closing the abdominal wall in adult patients who have an incisional hernia (a weakness or opening in a previous surgical incision) or who require prophylactic mesh placement during a laparotomy.

In one group, the abdominal wall is closed using the standard technique, in which a polypropylene mesh is fixed independently from the fascial suture. In the other group, Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) is used, a standardized execution of the technique of mesh incorporation into the fascial closure described by Jamal et al (Hernia, 2013).

The choice of technique is made by the patient after receiving information about both options and providing informed consent. Participants will be followed clinically and with imaging for 18 to 24 months to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility, and reproducibility of the IMFC technique, and to determine the incidence of hernia recurrence in both groups.

Studieöversikt

Status

Rekrytering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Incisional hernia is one of the most frequent complications of abdominal surgery, with a reported incidence of 10-20% after laparotomy, and recurrence rates after mesh repair reaching 20-30% in long-term follow-up. In conventional techniques, primary fascial closure and mesh fixation are performed as two mechanically independent steps, concentrating tension on the suture line during the acute postoperative period.

The Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) technique integrates a macroporous polypropylene mesh within a continuous fascial suture line (pattern: mesh → right fascial edge → left fascial edge → mesh), aiming to distribute tensile load simultaneously between the fascia and the prosthesis, potentially reducing the incidence of hernia recurrence compared to standard closure. The principle of incorporating the mesh into the fascial closure was described by Jamal et al in a retrospective series of 72 patients. IMFC standardizes its execution (suture material, 5-mm bites in mesh and fascia, anchoring of the suture line in healthy aponeurosis, and optional minimal peripheral fixation) and evaluates it prospectively against standard closure.

This is a prospective, comparative, quasi-experimental (non-randomized) study conducted at a single center (Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain," Berisso, Argentina). Eligible patients choose, after informed consent, between standard mesh closure (Group A) or IMFC (Group B). Both groups follow the same clinical and imaging follow-up schedule (days 7, 15, 30; months 2, 6, 12, 18; and a final visit between 18 and 24 months).

The study is designed as an initial, hypothesis-generating comparison of safety, technical feasibility, and reproducibility across surgeons, intended to support a future randomized trial.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Beräknad)

60

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studiekontakt

Studera Kontakt Backup

  • Namn: Emiliano D Gargiulo, MD
  • Telefonnummer: +54 2215371371

Studieorter

  • Argentina
    • Buenos Aires
      • Berisso, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1923
        • Rekrytering
        • Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
          • Emiliano D Gargiulo, MD
          • Telefonnummer: +54 9 221 5371371

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults older than 18 years of age
  • Patients with incisional (ventral) hernia
  • Patients with recurrent incisional hernia
  • Incisional hernias with a diameter greater than 4 cm
  • Patients undergoing laparotomy with an indication for prophylactic mesh placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active surgical site infection
  • Overt abdominal contamination
  • Tissue necrosis or inability to achieve primary fascial closure
  • Non-correctable loss of domain
  • Pregnant women or women of childbearing potential planning pregnancy or not using contraception during the follow-up period
  • Patients belonging to vulnerable populations, in accordance with Law 15.462 and applicable ethical guidelines
  • Active oncologic disease (patients with a cured oncologic history may be included)

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Icke-randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Enda

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Standard Mesh Closure

Conventional fascial closure using a macroporous polypropylene mesh fixed independently from the closure suture
Procedur: Standard Fascial Closure with Mesh

Macroporous polypropylene mesh (FILAPROP™/MERIGROW™) plus non-absorbable polypropylene suture, placed using the conventional (independent) technique.
Experimentell: Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure - IMFC

Fascial closure using the Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure (IMFC) technique: the mesh is incorporated within the trajectory of a single continuous fascial suture (pattern: mesh → right fascial edge → left fascial edge → mesh
Procedur: Integrated Mesh-Fascial Closure

Same materials integrated into a single continuous suture line using the IMFC technique.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Recurrence rate of incisional hernia
Tidsram: 18-24 months (final follow-up visit)

Proportion of participants with hernia recurrence, assessed by clinical physical examination and abdominal wall ultrasound, performed in all participants at 6 months and at the final visit (18-24 months). All ultrasound evaluations performed by the same sonographer throughout the study; the sonographer is aware of study participation but blinded to the specific surgical technique (IMFC vs. standard closure) received by each participant.
18-24 months (final follow-up visit)
Rate of Major Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications
Tidsram: Throughout study participation (up to 24 months)

Proportion of participants experiencing a serious adverse event (SAE), defined per ICH E6(R3) as death, a life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability, or an unplanned surgical reintervention. Postoperative complications additionally graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system (Grade I-V) to assess severity.
Throughout study participation (up to 24 months)

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Operative time and fascial closure time
Tidsram: Intraoperative (during the surgical procedure)

Total operative time (from skin incision to skin closure) and fascial closure time (from start to completion of the mesh-fascial suture line), both measured in minutes and recorded intraoperatively by the surgical team using the operating room clock.
Intraoperative (during the surgical procedure)
Postoperative Pain Assessed by the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11)
Tidsram: Postoperative days 7, 15, and 30

Self-reported postoperative pain intensity measured using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS-11), an unabbreviated verbally- or visually-administered numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable." Higher scores indicate worse (more severe) pain. Assessed at rest.
Postoperative days 7, 15, and 30
Rate of Early Postoperative Complications (Infection, Seroma, Dehiscence, Hematoma)
Tidsram: Up to 30 days postoperative

Proportion of participants with surgical site infection, seroma, wound dehiscence, or hematoma, identified by clinical examination at scheduled postoperative visits (days 7, 15, and 30) and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Up to 30 days postoperative
Total Direct Hospital Costs (ARS) Associated with Complications or Reoperations
Tidsram: Up to 24 months (exploratory)

Total direct hospital costs, expressed in Argentine pesos (ARS), attributable to management of complications or unplanned reoperations, extracted from institutional administrative and billing records. Exploratory outcome; not powered for formal statistical comparison between groups.
Up to 24 months (exploratory)

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Mario V Larrain

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Facundo B Mattano, MD, Hospital Zonal General de Agudos "Dr. Mario V. Larrain

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Allmänna publikationer

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

28 september 2026

Primärt slutförande (Beräknad)

15 oktober 2030

Avslutad studie (Beräknad)

15 oktober 2032

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

18 september 2026

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

23 september 2026

Första postat (Faktisk)

25 september 2026

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

14 oktober 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

8 oktober 2026

Senast verifierad

1 oktober 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Nyckelord

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • IMFC-HL-2026
  • DISPO-2026-226-GDEBA-DIYCTMSAL (Annan identifierare: Comisión Conjunta de Investigaciones en Salud (CCIS))

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera