First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 568): Outcomes by Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Tumor Mutational Burden as Biomarkers

Neal Ready, Matthew D Hellmann, Mark M Awad, Gregory A Otterson, Martin Gutierrez, Justin F Gainor, Hossein Borghaei, Jacques Jolivet, Leora Horn, Mihaela Mates, Julie Brahmer, Ian Rabinowitz, Pavan S Reddy, Jason Chesney, James Orcutt, David R Spigel, Martin Reck, Kenneth John O'Byrne, Luis Paz-Ares, Wenhua Hu, Kim Zerba, Xuemei Li, Brian Lestini, William J Geese, Joseph D Szustakowski, George Green, Han Chang, Suresh S Ramalingam, Neal Ready, Matthew D Hellmann, Mark M Awad, Gregory A Otterson, Martin Gutierrez, Justin F Gainor, Hossein Borghaei, Jacques Jolivet, Leora Horn, Mihaela Mates, Julie Brahmer, Ian Rabinowitz, Pavan S Reddy, Jason Chesney, James Orcutt, David R Spigel, Martin Reck, Kenneth John O'Byrne, Luis Paz-Ares, Wenhua Hu, Kim Zerba, Xuemei Li, Brian Lestini, William J Geese, Joseph D Szustakowski, George Green, Han Chang, Suresh S Ramalingam

Abstract

Purpose: CheckMate 568 is an open-label phase II trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the association of efficacy with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB).

Patients and methods: Two hundred eighty-eight patients with previously untreated, recurrent stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in patients with 1% or more and less than 1% tumor PD-L1 expression. Efficacy on the basis of TMB (FoundationOne CDx assay) was a secondary end point.

Results: Of treated patients with tumor available for testing, 252 patients (88%) of 288 were evaluable for PD-L1 expression and 98 patients (82%) of 120 for TMB. ORR was 30% overall and 41% and 15% in patients with 1% or greater and less than 1% tumor PD-L1 expression, respectively. ORR increased with higher TMB, plateauing at 10 or more mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). Regardless of PD-L1 expression, ORRs were higher in patients with TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb (n = 48: PD-L1, ≥ 1%, 48%; PD-L1, < 1%, 47%) versus TMB of fewer than 10 mut/Mb (n = 50: PD-L1, ≥ 1%, 18%; PD-L1, < 1%, 5%), and progression-free survival was longer in patients with TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb versus TMB of fewer than 10 mut/Mb (median, 7.1 v 2.6 months). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 29% of patients.

Conclusion: Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab was effective and tolerable as a first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC. TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb was associated with improved response and prolonged progression-free survival in both tumor PD-L1 expression 1% or greater and less than 1% subgroups and was thus identified as a potentially relevant cutoff in the assessment of TMB as a biomarker for first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02659059.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Receiver operating characteristic curves of objective response rate by (A) tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and (B) tumor mutational burden (TMB). AUC, area under the curve.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Progression-free survival (PFS) by (A) tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and (B) tumor mutational burden (TMB) cutoff. mut/Mb, mutations per megabase.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Study design. (*) Efficacy analyses by blinded independent central review. (†) Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status determined by Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx immunohistochemical test. Database lock: August 24, 2017; minimum follow-up: 6 months; median follow-up: 8.8 months. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NSCLC, non–small-cell lung cancer; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TMB, tumor mutational burden.
FIG A2.
FIG A2.
Biomarker assessment flow diagram. PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; TMB, tumor mutational burden.
FIG A3.
FIG A3.
Regression analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. mut/Mb, mutations per megabase.
FIG A4.
FIG A4.
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) distribution across first-line non–small-cell lung cancer data sets. (*) In CheckMate 026, TMB was evaluated by whole-exome sequencing and values were converted to mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) using TMB bridging analysis.
FIG A5.
FIG A5.
Progression-free survival (PFS) in all treated patients.
FIG A6.
FIG A6.
Progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with 50% or greater tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. NA, not available.
FIG A7.
FIG A7.
Tumor responses by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) category. (A) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for TMB and objective response rate (ORR) by tumor PD-L1 expression. (B) ORRs per blinded independent central review. (*)Complete responses were 4% for both TMB less than 10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) and TMB 10 or more mut/Mb. (†) Complete responses were 0% for TMB less than 10 mut/Mb and 16% for TMB 10 or more mut/Mb. AUC, area under the curve.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN guidelines: Non-small cell lung cancer.
    1. Hanna N, Johnson D, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3484–3515.
    1. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) [package insert] Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co.; 2018.
    1. Opdivo (nivolumab) [package insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2018.
    1. Curran MA, Montalvo W, Yagita H, et al. PD-1 and CTLA-4 combination blockade expands infiltrating T cells and reduces regulatory T and myeloid cells within B16 melanoma tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:4275–4280.
    1. Antonia SJ, López-Martin JA, Bendell J, et al. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): A multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:883–895.
    1. Hellmann MD, Rizvi NA, Goldman JW, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): Results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:31–41.
    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34.
    1. Goldman JW, Antonia SJ, Gettinger SN, et al. Nivolumab (N) plus ipilimumab (I) as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced (adv) NSCLC: 2-yr OS and long-term outcomes from CheckMate 012. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl; abstr 9093)
    1. Antonia S, Gettinger S, Borghaei H, et al. Long-term outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC: 3-year follow-up from CheckMate 012; 19th World Conference on Lung Cancer; Toronto, ON, Canada. September 23-26, 2018.
    1. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–1639.
    1. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1–positive non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823–1833.
    1. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): A phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:255–265.
    1. Carbone DP, Reck M, Paz-Ares L, et al. First-line nivolumab in stage IV or recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2415–2426.
    1. Goodman AM, Kato S, Bazhenova L, et al. Tumor mutational burden as an independent predictor of response to immunotherapy in diverse cancers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2598–2608.
    1. Hellmann MD, Callahan MK, Awad MM, et al. Tumor mutational burden and efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy and in combination with ipilimumab in small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:853–861.e4.
    1. Kowanetz M, Zou W, Shames D, et al. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is associated with improved efficacy of atezolizumab in 1L and 2L+ NSCLC patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(suppl; abstr OA20.01):S321–S322.
    1. Rizvi H, Sanchez-Vega F, La K, et al. Molecular determinants of response to anti–programmed cell death (PD)-1 and anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer profiled with targeted next-generation sequencing. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:633–641.
    1. Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015;348:124–128.
    1. Yarchoan M, Hopkins A, Jaffee EM. Tumor mutational burden and response rate to PD-1 inhibition. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2500–2501.
    1. Hellmann MD, Nathanson T, Rizvi H, et al. Genomic features of response to combination immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:843–852.e4.
    1. Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2093–2104.
    1. Foundation Medicine FoundationOne CDx technical information.
    1. Foundation Medicine FoundationOne CDx.
    1. Foundation Medicine FoundationOne CDx specimen instructions.
    1. Sun JX, He Y, Sanford E, et al. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1005965.
    1. Chalmers ZR, Connelly CF, Fabrizio D, et al. Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med. 2017;9:34.
    1. Szustakowski J, Green G, Geese WJ, et al. Evaluation of tumor mutational burden as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy: A calibration study of whole exome sequencing with FoundationOne. Cancer Res. 2018;78(suppl; abstr 5528)
    1. Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23:703–713.
    1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Data sharing request process.
    1. Capelletto E, Novello S, Scagliotti GV. First-line therapeutic options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the molecular medicine era. Future Oncol. 2014;10:1081–1093.
    1. Kruglyak KM, Lin E, Ong FS. Next-generation sequencing and applications to the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;890:123–136.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner