Assessing the effectiveness of a 3-month day-and-night home closed-loop control combined with pump suspend feature compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in youths and adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomised parallel study protocol

Lia Bally, Hood Thabit, Martin Tauschmann, Janet M Allen, Sara Hartnell, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Jane Exall, Viki Huegel, Judy Sibayan, Sarah Borgman, Peiyao Cheng, Maxine Blackburn, Julia Lawton, Daniela Elleri, Lalantha Leelarathna, Carlo L Acerini, Fiona Campbell, Viral N Shah, Amy Criego, Mark L Evans, David B Dunger, Craig Kollman, Richard M Bergenstal, Roman Hovorka, Lia Bally, Hood Thabit, Martin Tauschmann, Janet M Allen, Sara Hartnell, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Jane Exall, Viki Huegel, Judy Sibayan, Sarah Borgman, Peiyao Cheng, Maxine Blackburn, Julia Lawton, Daniela Elleri, Lalantha Leelarathna, Carlo L Acerini, Fiona Campbell, Viral N Shah, Amy Criego, Mark L Evans, David B Dunger, Craig Kollman, Richard M Bergenstal, Roman Hovorka

Abstract

Introduction: Despite therapeutic advances, many individuals with type 1 diabetes are unable to achieve tight glycaemic target without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a 3-month day-and-night home closed-loop glucose control combined with a pump suspend feature, compared with sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy in youths and adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes.

Methods and analysis: The study adopts an open-label, multi-centre, multi-national (UK and USA), randomised, single-period, parallel design and aims for 84 randomised patients. Participants are youths (6-21 years) or adults (>21 years) with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy and suboptimal glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and ≤10% (86 mmol/mol)). Following a 4-week run-in period, eligible participants will be randomised to a 3-month use of automated closed-loop insulin delivery combined with pump suspend feature or to sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome is the time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L based on continuous glucose monitoring levels during the 3-month free-living phase. Secondary outcomes include HbA1c at 3 months, mean glucose, time spent below and above target; time with glucose levels <3.5 and <2.8 mmol/L; area under the curve when sensor glucose is <3.5 mmol/L, time with glucose levels >16.7 mmol/L, glucose variability; total, basal and bolus insulin dose and change in body weight. Participants' and their families' perception in terms of lifestyle change, daily diabetes management and fear of hypoglycaemia will be evaluated.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics/institutional review board approval has been obtained. Before screening, all participants/guardians will be provided with oral and written information about the trial. The study will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT02523131; Pre-results.

Keywords: artificial pancreas; closed-loop; type 1 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SH serves as a consultant for Novo-Nordisk and for the ONSET group and reports having received speaker/training honoraria from Medtronic. MLE reports having received speaker honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, Novo Nordisk and Animas and serving on advisory panels for Novo Nordisk, Abbott Diabetes Care, Medtronic, Roche and Cellnovo. RH reports having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Astra Zeneca; serving on advisory panel for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk; receiving license fees from BBraun and Medtronic and having served as a consultant to BBraun. MEW has received license fees from Becton Dickinson and has served as a consultant to Beckton Dickinson. MT reports having received speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk and Medtronic. RH and MEW report patent patents and patent applications. LL reports having received speaker honoraria from Minimed Medtronic, Animas, Sanofi and Novo Nordisk and serving on advisory panel for Animas Minimed Medtronic and Novo Nordisk. VNS had received speaking fees from the Dexcom Inc. VNS employer received research funding from T1D Exchange and Sanofi. LB, HT, JMA, JE, VH, JS, SB, PC, MB, JL, DE, CLA, FC, AC, MLE, DBD, CK and RMB declare no competing financial interests exist.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Closed-loop system prototype. (A) Components of the FlorenceM closed-loop system consist of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) transmitter with Enlite 3 sensor, an insulin pump (modified 640G pump) integrated with the CGM receiver and a mobile phone running the control algorithm. (B) A photo of a participant (obtained with consent) using the closed-loop system.

References

    1. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2014;383:69–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60591-7
    1. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas. 7th Edition 2015, 2016. (last accessed 24 March 2016).
    1. Home PD. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequences. Diabetes Obes Metab 2012;14:780–8. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01580.x
    1. Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, et al. . Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1464–76. 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017
    1. Kropff J, DeVries JH. Continuous glucose monitoring, future products, and update on worldwide artificial pancreas projects. Diabetes Technol Ther 2016;18(Suppl 2):S2-53–S2-63. 10.1089/dia.2015.0345
    1. Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 2011;343:d3805 10.1136/bmj.d3805
    1. Borges U, Kubiak T. Continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: human factors and usage. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2016. 10.1177/1932296816634736
    1. Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, et al. . Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 2013;369:224–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1303576
    1. Thabit H, Hovorka R. Coming of age: the artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2016;59:1795–805. 10.1007/s00125-016-4022-4
    1. Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, et al. . Home use of an artificial beta cell in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2129–40. 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351
    1. Kropff J, Del Favero S, Place J, et al. . 2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:939–47. 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00335-6
    1. Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, et al. . Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA 2016;316:1407–8. 10.1001/jama.2016.11708
    1. Ruan Y, Thabit H, Leelarathna L, et al. . Variability of insulin requirements over 12 weeks of closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016;39:830–2. 10.2337/dc15-2623
    1. Kovatchev B, Cobelli C, Renard E, et al. . Multinational study of subcutaneous model-predictive closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: summary of the results. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:1374–81. 10.1177/193229681000400611
    1. Hovorka R, Kumareswaran K, Harris J, et al. . Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies. BMJ 2011;342:d1855 10.1136/bmj.d1855
    1. Del Favero S, Bruttomesso D, Di Palma F, et al. . First use of model predictive control in outpatient wearable artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1212–5. 10.2337/dc13-1631
    1. Phillip M, Battelino T, Atlas E, et al. . Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp. N Engl J Med 2013;368:824–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1206881
    1. FDA. FDA approves first automated insulin delivery device for type 1diabetes. (last accessed 24 Oct 2016).
    1. Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. . Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1384–95. 10.2337/dc12-2480
    1. Hovorka R, Shojaee-Moradie F, Carroll PV, et al. . Partitioning glucose distribution/transport, disposal, and endogenous production during IVGTT. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002;282:E992–E1007. 10.1152/ajpendo.00304.2001
    1. Wilinska ME, Chassin LJ, Acerini CL, et al. . Simulation environment to evaluate closed-loop insulin delivery systems in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:132–44. 10.1177/193229681000400117
    1. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage, 1990.
    1. Leelarathna L, Dellweg S, Mader JK, et al. . Day and night home closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes: three-center randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1931–7. 10.2337/dc13-2911
    1. Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, et al. . Day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a free-living, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1168–74. 10.2337/dc15-2078
    1. Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, et al. . Home use of day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a 3-week, free-living, randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2019–25. 10.2337/dc16-1094
    1. Bally L, Thabit H, Kojzar H, et al. . Closed-loop insulin delivery in well-controlled type 1 diabetes adults: a free-living day-and-night randomised crossover study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:261–70.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner