Gastric surgery for morbid obesity. The Adelaide Study

J C Hall, J M Watts, P E O'Brien, R E Dunstan, J F Walsh, A H Slavotinek, R G Elmslie, J C Hall, J M Watts, P E O'Brien, R E Dunstan, J F Walsh, A H Slavotinek, R G Elmslie

Abstract

The efficacy of three gastric restriction operations were compared in a prospective randomized study of 310 morbidly obese subjects. The median patient age was 34 years (range, 18 to 62 years). They were predominantly female (13:1) and had a median pre-operative weight that was 198% of their ideal weight (range, 160% to 318%). There was an equitable dispersion of perceived risk factors between the groups under study and there were no deaths during the perioperative period. Compliance with follow-up at 3 years was 91%. When success was defined as a loss of more than 50% of excess weight or a current pregnancy, the success rates at 3 years were 17% for gastrogastrostomy, 48% for vertical gastroplasty, and 67% for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (p less than 0.001). Although the gastric bypass operation took longer to perform, there were similar outcome patterns for the three groups during the postoperative period. We conclude that the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the preferred procedure for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.

References

    1. Surgery. 1985 May;97(5):535-8
    1. Am J Surg. 1985 Apr;149(4):551-7
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Dec;103(6 ( Pt 2)):1043-7
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Apr;143(4):417-29
    1. Surgery. 1986 Jul;100(1):126-8
    1. Can J Surg. 1986 Sep;29(5):322-4
    1. Arch Surg. 1987 May;122(5):610-4
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;67(3):521-37
    1. Ann Surg. 1987 Jun;205(6):613-24
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jul 11;295(6590):72-3
    1. Ann Surg. 1987 Sep;206(3):316-23
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987 Sep-Oct;11(5):494-8
    1. Ann Surg. 1987 Nov;206(5):555-63
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 Sep;83(9):930-4
    1. Am J Surg. 1989 Jan;157(1):93-102
    1. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103-15
    1. Ann Surg. 1977 Oct;186(4):500-9
    1. World J Surg. 1977 Nov;1(6):757-68
    1. Lancet. 1979 Dec 15;2(8155):1255-8
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Feb;33(2 Suppl):358-63
    1. Surgery. 1980 Sep;88(3):433-44
    1. Ann Surg. 1981 Mar;193(3):334-40
    1. Arch Surg. 1982 May;117(5):695-700
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Sep;155(3):385-94
    1. World J Surg. 1982 Jul;6(4):403-11
    1. Ann Surg. 1982 Oct;196(4):389-99
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Mar 5;286(6367):763
    1. Arch Surg. 1983 Jun;118(6):681-4
    1. Arch Surg. 1983 Jun;118(6):685-92
    1. Aust N Z J Surg. 1983 Aug;53(4):321-4
    1. Ann Surg. 1983 Nov;198(5):585-91
    1. N Engl J Med. 1984 Feb 9;310(6):352-6
    1. Surgery. 1984 Feb;95(2):215-20
    1. Ann Surg. 1984 May;199(5):555-62
    1. Am J Surg. 1984 Sep;148(3):331-6
    1. Gastroenterology. 1984 Dec;87(6):1381-91
    1. Br J Surg. 1985 Feb;72(2):81-7
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 10;291(6492):379-82

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner