Pilonidal sinus in adolescence: is there an ideal surgical approach?

M Roldón Golet, A Siles Hinojosa, Y González Ruiz, R Escartín Villacampa, I Goded Broto, P Bragagnini Rodríguez, M Roldón Golet, A Siles Hinojosa, Y González Ruiz, R Escartín Villacampa, I Goded Broto, P Bragagnini Rodríguez

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this work was to compare excision with primary closure according to Karydakis technique (KT) with en bloc resection with secondary healing (EB) in the treatment of pilonidal sinus in adolescents.

Material and methods: An observational, retrospective, multi-center study was carried out in adolescent patients (11-18 years old) diagnosed with pilonidal sinus and undergoing surgery from 2011 to 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups: KT (pediatric surgeons) and EB (general surgeons).

Results: Our sample consisted of 61 patients (KT: 26 patients; EB: 35 patients). Mean total recovery time (days) was significantly shorter in the KT group (37.77 KT vs. 107.76 EB, p< 0.001). In terms of postoperative complications, no differences were noted regarding overall complication rate (53.8% KT vs. 40% EB). However, differences were found in postoperative bleeding (0% KT vs. 25.7% EB, p=0.005), seroma occurrence (23.1% KT vs. 0% EB, p=0.003), and surgical wound dehiscence (42.3% KT vs. 8.6% EB, p=0.002). Recurrence rate was lower in the Karydakis group than in the en bloc resection group (4% vs. 28.6%, p=0.015).

Conclusions: Both surgical techniques (KT and EB) are acceptable and safe, but in our study, Karydakis technique demonstrated to be more effective than en bloc resection with secondary closure, since it allowed for shorter recovery times and lower recurrence rates. Therefore, Karydakis surgical technique can be an excellent alternative in the treatment of pilonidal sinus in the adolescent population.

Keywords: Adolescents; En bloc resection; Karydakis; Pilonidal sinus.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner