Effect of Oral Semaglutide on the Pharmacokinetics of Lisinopril, Warfarin, Digoxin, and Metformin in Healthy Subjects

Tine A Bækdal, Jeanett Borregaard, Cilie W Hansen, Mette Thomsen, Thomas W Anderson, Tine A Bækdal, Jeanett Borregaard, Cilie W Hansen, Mette Thomsen, Thomas W Anderson

Abstract

Background: Oral semaglutide is a tablet co-formulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog semaglutide with the absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC). The absorption of coadministered oral drugs may be altered due to enhancement by SNAC, potential gastric emptying delay by semaglutide, or other mechanisms. Two one-sequence crossover trials investigated the effect of oral semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics of lisinopril, warfarin, digoxin, and metformin.

Methods: In trial 1, 52 healthy subjects received lisinopril (20 mg single dose) or warfarin (25 mg single dose) with subsequent coadministration with SNAC alone (300 mg single dose), followed by oral semaglutide 20 mg once daily (steady state). In trial 2, 32 healthy subjects received digoxin (500 μg single dose) or metformin (850 mg twice daily for 4 days), with subsequent coadministration with SNAC alone followed by oral semaglutide, as in trial 1.

Results: There were no apparent effects of oral semaglutide on area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for lisinopril, warfarin, and digoxin. The AUC of metformin was increased by 32% (90% confidence interval 1.23-1.43) by oral semaglutide coadministration versus metformin alone, whereas the Cmax was unaffected. SNAC alone did not affect exposure of lisinopril, warfarin, digoxin, or metformin. Adverse events were in line with those previously observed for GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Conclusions: Oral semaglutide or SNAC alone did not appear to affect the exposure of lisinopril, warfarin, or digoxin, and, based on its wide therapeutic index, the higher metformin exposure with oral semaglutide was not considered clinically relevant.

Conflict of interest statement

Tine A. Bækdal, Mette Thomsen, and Thomas W. Anderson are employees of, and own stock, in Novo Nordisk A/S. Jeanett Borregaard is an employee of Novo Nordisk A/S. Cilie W. Hansen was an employee of Novo Nordisk A/S at the time of writing this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Design, dosing, and sampling for a trial 1 and b trial 2. a Lisinopril 20 mg and warfarin 25 mg (both analyzed after a single dose). b Digoxin 500 μg (single-dose analysis) and metformin 850 mg twice daily (steady-state analysis). PK denotes pharmacokinetic sampling, Dig digoxin, Lis lisinopril, Met metformin, SNAC sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate, War warfarin
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Geometric mean plasma concentration–time profiles of lisinopril, S-warfarin, digoxin, and metformin with or without coadministration of oral semaglutide or SNAC. a Lisinopril (single dose) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC. b S-warfarin (single dose) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC*. * Excludes the 12 subjects administered a lower dose of warfarin (administration of warfarin 5 mg instead of 25 mg) during coadministration with SNAC. c Digoxin (single dose) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC. d Metformin (steady state) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC. SNAC sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Geometric mean plasma concentration–time profiles of lisinopril, S-warfarin, digoxin, and metformin with or without coadministration of oral semaglutide or SNAC. a Lisinopril (single dose) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC. b S-warfarin (single dose) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC*. * Excludes the 12 subjects administered a lower dose of warfarin (administration of warfarin 5 mg instead of 25 mg) during coadministration with SNAC. c Digoxin (single dose) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC. d Metformin (steady state) ± oral semaglutide ± SNAC. SNAC sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Estimated AUC and Cmax ratios (with 90% CI) for lisinopril, warfarin*, digoxin, and metformin with or without coadministration of a oral semaglutide or b SNAC. * Excludes the 12 subjects administered 5 mg warfarin instead of 25 mg during coadministration with SNAC. AUC0–12h area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to 12 h, AUC0–inf area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity, CI confidence interval, Cmax maximum plasma concentration, SNAC sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate

References

    1. Cooke CE, Lee HY, Tong YP, et al. Persistence with injectable antidiabetic agents in members with type 2 diabetes in a commercial managed care organization. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:231–238. doi: 10.1185/03007990903421994.
    1. Ahrén B, Masmiquel L, Kumar H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:341–354. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30092-X.
    1. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:355–366. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30085-2.
    1. Sorli C, Harashima SI, Tsoukas GM, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:251–260. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30013-X.
    1. Buckley ST, Bækdal TA, Vegge A, et al. Transcellular stomach absorption of a derivatized glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(467):eaar7047. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar7047.
    1. Connor A, Borregaard J, Buckley ST, et al. Site of absorption of an oral formulation of semaglutide. Diabetes. 2017;66(Suppl. 1):1180-P.
    1. Davies M, Pieber TR, Artoft-Nielsen ML, et al. Effect of oral semaglutide compared with placebo and subcutaneous semaglutide on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1460–1470. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14752.
    1. Amidon GL, Lennernäs H, Shah VP, et al. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995;12:413–420. doi: 10.1023/A:1016212804288.
    1. Malm-Erjefalt M, Ekblom M, Vouis J, et al. Effect on the gastrointestinal absorption of drugs from different classes in the biopharmaceutics classification system, when treating with liraglutide. Mol Pharm. 2015;12:4166–4173. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00278.
    1. Lisinopril 20 mg tablets. Summary of product characteristics. . Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
    1. Lindenberg M, Kopp S, Dressman JB. Classification of orally administered drugs on the World Health Organization Model list of Essential Medicines according to the biopharmaceutics classification system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;58:265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.001.
    1. Soon D, Kothare PA, Linnebjerg H, et al. Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy Asian men. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:1179–1187. doi: 10.1177/0091270006291622.
    1. Digoxin. Summary of product characteristics. . Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
    1. Marathe PH, Wen Y, Norton J, et al. Effect of altered gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility on metformin absorption. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50:325–332. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00264.x.
    1. Pentikäinen PJ, Neuvonen PJ, Penttilä A. Pharmacokinetics of metformin after intravenous and oral administration to man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;16:195–202. doi: 10.1007/BF00562061.
    1. Sambol NC, Brookes LG, Chiang J, et al. Food intake and dosage level, but not tablet vs solution dosage form, affect the absorption of metformin HCl in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42:510–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00017.x.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Drug interaction studies—study design, data analysis, implications for dosing and labeling recommendations. . Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the investigation of drug interactions. . Accessed 30 Sept 2018.
    1. Hausner H, Derving Karsbøl J, Holst AG, et al. Effect of semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics of metformin, warfarin, atorvastatin and digoxin in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:1391–1401. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0532-6.
    1. Granhall C, Donsmark M, Blicher TM, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of the novel oral human GLP-1 analogue, oral semaglutide, in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0728-4.
    1. Graham GG, Punt J, Arora M, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:81–98. doi: 10.2165/11534750-000000000-00000.
    1. Granhall C, Sondergaard FL, Thomsen M, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide in subjects with renal impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:1571–1580. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0649-2.
    1. Kothare PA, Soon DK, Linnebjerg H, et al. Effect of exenatide on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45:1032–1037. doi: 10.1177/0091270005278806.
    1. TRULICITY 1.5 mg & 0.75 mg solution for injection. Summary of product characteristics. . Accessed 30 Aug 2018.
    1. McCreight LJ, Bailey CJ, Pearson ER. Metformin and the gastrointestinal tract. Diabetologia. 2016;59:426–435. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3844-9.
    1. Metformin. Summary of product characteristics. . Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
    1. Haluzik M, Rosenstock J, Terauchi Y, et al. Effect and safety or oral semaglutide monotherapy in type 2 diabetes: PIONEER 1 trial [oral presentation #38]. Presentation at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes 54th Annual Meeting, 1–5 October 2018, Berlin, Germany.
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner