Intravenous immunoglobulin for maintenance treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a multicentre, open-label, 52-week phase III trial

Satoshi Kuwabara, Masahiro Mori, Sonoko Misawa, Miki Suzuki, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Tatsuro Mutoh, Shizuki Doi, Norito Kokubun, Mikiko Kamijo, Hiroo Yoshikawa, Koji Abe, Yoshihiko Nishida, Kazumasa Okada, Kenji Sekiguchi, Ko Sakamoto, Susumu Kusunoki, Gen Sobue, Ryuji Kaji, Glovenin-I CIDP Study Group, Satoshi Kuwabara, Masahiro Mori, Sonoko Misawa, Miki Suzuki, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Tatsuro Mutoh, Shizuki Doi, Norito Kokubun, Mikiko Kamijo, Hiroo Yoshikawa, Koji Abe, Yoshihiko Nishida, Kazumasa Okada, Kenji Sekiguchi, Ko Sakamoto, Susumu Kusunoki, Gen Sobue, Ryuji Kaji, Glovenin-I CIDP Study Group

Abstract

Objective: Short-term efficacy of induction therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (Ig) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is well established. However, data of previous studies on maintenance therapy were limited up to 24-week treatment period. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of longer-term intravenous Ig therapy for 52 weeks.

Methods: This study was an open-label phase 3 clinical trial conducted in 49 Japanese tertiary centres. 49 patients with CIDP who fulfilled diagnostic criteria were included. After an induction intravenous Ig therapy (0.4 g/kg/day for five consecutive days), maintenance dose intravenous Ig (1.0 g/kg) was given every 3 weeks for up to 52 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the responder rate at week 28 and relapse rate at week 52. The response and relapse were defined with the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment scale.

Results: At week 28, the responder rate was 77.6% (38/49 patients; 95% CI 63% to 88%), and the 38 responders continued the maintenance therapy. At week 52, 4 of the 38 (10.5%) had a relapse (95% CI 3% to 25%). During 52 weeks, 34 (69.4%) of the 49 enrolled patients had a maintained improvement. Adverse events were reported in 94% of the patients; two patients (66-year-old and 76-year-old men with hypertension or diabetes) developed cerebral infarction (lacunar infarct with good recovery), and the other adverse effects were mild and resolved by the end of the study period.

Conclusions: Maintenance treatment with 1.0 g/kg intravenous Ig every 3 weeks is an efficacious therapy for patients with CIDP, and approximately 70% of them had a sustained remission for 52 weeks. Thrombotic complications should be carefully monitored, particularly in elderly patients with vascular risk factors.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01824251).

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SKuw, SKus, GS, and RK have received consultancy fees, lecture fees and travel expenses on the steering committee from Nihon Pharmaceutical. KSa is employees of Nihon Pharmaceutical. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and trial profile. INCAT, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Responder rate and relapse rate. The responder rate is defined as the percentage of patients who had sustained INCAT score improvement of 1 point or more compared with that at week 1 (before administration) at week 28. The relapse rate indicates the percentage of patients whose INCAT score fell by 1 point or more from that of week 28 (before administration) at week 52. Horizontal lines indicate the responder rate (20.7%) for placebo group in the ICE study first period and relapse rate (42.3%) for placebo group in ICE study extension phase. ICE, Intravenous Ig in CIDP Efficacy; INCAT, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transition diagram for the total INCAT score (A) and MRC sum score (B). INCAT, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment; MRC, Medical Research Council; SCR, screening.

References

    1. Mathey EK, Park SB, Hughes RA, et al. . Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from pathology to phenotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:973–85. 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309697
    1. Kuwabara S, Isose S, Mori M, et al. . Different electrophysiological profiles and treatment response in ‘typical’ and ‘atypical’ chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:1054–9. 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308452
    1. van Doorn PA, Vermeulen M, Brand A, et al. . Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with improvement. Arch Neurol 1991;48:217–20.
    1. Hahn AF, Bolton CF, Zochodne D, et al. . Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Brain 1996;119:1067–77. 10.1093/brain/119.4.1067
    1. Mendell JR, Barohn RJ, Freimer ML, et al. . Randomized controlled trial of IVIg in untreated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Neurology 2001;56:445–9. 10.1212/WNL.56.4.445
    1. Hughes RA, Donofrio P, Bril V, et al. . Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:136–44. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70329-0
    1. van Doorn PA, Brand A, Strengers PF, et al. . High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Neurology 1990;40:209–12. 10.1212/WNL.40.2.209
    1. Nobile-Orazio E, Cocito D, Jann S, et al. . Intravenous immunoglobulin versus intravenous methylprednisolone for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:493–502. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70093-5
    1. Léger JM, De Bleecker JL, Sommer C, et al. . Efficacy and safety of in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: results of a prospective, single-arm, open-label Phase III study (the PRIMA study). J Peripher Nerv Syst 2013;18:130–40. 10.1111/jns5.12017
    1. Joint Task Force of the EFNS and the PNS. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society—first revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2010;15:1–9. 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00245.x
    1. Hughes R, Bensa S, Willison H, et al. . Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Ann Neurol 2001;50:195–201.
    1. Merkies ISJ, Schmitz PIM, van der Meché FGA, et al. . Psychometric evaluation of a new sensory scale in immune-mediated polyneuropathies. Neurology 2000;54:943–9.
    1. Kleyweg RP, van der Meché FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:1103–9. 10.1002/mus.880141111
    1. Donofrio PD, Bril V, Dalakas MC, et al. . Safety and tolerability of immune globulin intravenous in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Arch Neurol 2010;67:1082–8. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.223
    1. Kuitwaard K, Hahn AF, Vermeulen M, et al. . Intravenous immunoglobulin response in treatment-naïve chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:1331–6. 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309042
    1. Rajabally YA, Wong SL, Kearney DA. Immunoglobulin G level variations in treated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: clues for future treatment regimens? J Neurol 2013;260:2052–6. 10.1007/s00415-013-6938-7
    1. Dyck PJ, Litchy WJ, Kratz KM, et al. . A plasma exchange versus immune globulin infusion trial in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Ann Neurol 1994;36:838–45. 10.1002/ana.410360607
    1. Kuwabara S, Misawa S, Mori M, et al. . Long term prognosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a five year follow up of 38 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:66–70. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.065441
    1. Querol L, Rojas-Garcia R, Casasnovas C, et al. . Long-term outcome in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin: a retrospective study. Muscle Nerve 2013;48:870–6. 10.1002/mus.23843
    1. Adrichem ME, Eftimov F, van Schaik IN. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, a time to start and a time to stop. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2016;21:121–7. 10.1111/jns.12176
    1. Dalakas MC. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular diseases: evidence-based indications and safety profile. Pharmacol Ther 2004;102:177–93. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.04.002

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner