Natural history of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in the progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired fasting glycemia and impaired glucose tolerance: the Inter99 study

Kristine Faerch, Allan Vaag, Jens J Holst, Torben Hansen, Torben Jørgensen, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Kristine Faerch, Allan Vaag, Jens J Holst, Torben Hansen, Torben Jørgensen, Knut Borch-Johnsen

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in the development of isolated impaired fasting glycemia (i-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT), and combined IFG/IGT.

Research design and methods: Baseline and 5-year follow-up data from the Inter99 study were used. Individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) at baseline and i-IFG, i-IGT, combined IFG/IGT, or NGT at the 5-year follow-up were examined with an oral glucose tolerance test (n = 3,145). Insulin sensitivity index (ISI), homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IS), early-phase insulin release (EPIR), and insulin secretion relative to insulin action (disposition index) were estimated.

Results: Five years before the pre-diabetes diagnoses (i-IFG, i-IGT, and IFG/IGT), ISI, HOMA-IS, EPIR, and disposition index were lower than in individuals who maintained NGT. During the 5-year follow-up, individuals developing i-IFG experienced a significant decline only in HOMA-IS, whereas individuals developing i-IGT experienced significant declines in ISI, EPIR, and disposition index. Individuals with IFG/IGT exhibited pronounced declines in ISI, HOMA-IS, EPIR, and disposition index during the 5-year follow-up.

Conclusions: A stationary reduced insulin secretion followed by a decline in primarily hepatic insulin sensitivity characterizes the transition from NGT to i-IFG. In contrast, low whole-body insulin sensitivity with a secondary lack of beta-cell compensation is associated with the development of i-IGT. Thereby, i-IFG and i-IGT appear to result from different underlying mechanisms, which may have implications for the prevention and treatment of the diabetes that succeeds them.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline and 5-year values of ISI (A), HOMA-IS (B), EPIR (C), and DI (D) in 3,145 individuals developing i-IFG (□), i-IGT (▵), or IFG/IGT (○) or maintaining NGT status (⋄). Data are presented as medians. P values for differences in changes (5-year minus baseline) between groups are adjusted for age, sex, family history of diabetes, and risk/intervention group as well as for changes in BMI, smoking, physical activity, and dietary quality during the 5 years of follow-up. Wald test from linear models (P < 0.05): a, i-IFG vs. NGT; b, i-IGT vs. NGT; c, IFG/IGT vs. NGT; d, i-IGT vs. i-IFG, e, IFG/IGT vs. i-IFG; f, IFG/IGT vs. i-IGT.

References

    1. Færch K, Vaag A, Holst J, Glümer C, Pedersen O, Borch-Johnsen K: Impaired fasting glycaemia vs impaired glucose tolerance: similar impairment of pancreatic α and β cell function but differential roles of incretin hormones and insulin action. Diabetologia 51:853–861, 2008
    1. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Pratley RE: Metabolic characteristics of individuals with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 48:2197–2203, 1999
    1. Laakso M, Zilinskaite J, Hansen T, Boesgaard T, Vänttinen M, Stancáková A, Jansson PA, Pellmé F, Holst J, Kuulasmaa T, Hribal M, Sesti G, Stefan N, Fritsche A, Häring H, Pedersen O, Smith U, EUGENE: Insulin sensitivity, insulin release and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in persons with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance in the EUGENE2 study. Diabetologia 51:502–511, 2008
    1. Bock G, Man CD, Campioni M, Chittilapilly E, Basu R, Toffolo G, Cobelli C, Rizza R: Pathogenesis of pre-diabetes: mechanisms of fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in people with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 55:3536–3549, 2006
    1. Abdul-Ghani MA, Jenkinson CP, Richardson DK, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA: Insulin secretion and action in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: results from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study. Diabetes 55:1430–1435, 2006
    1. Meyer C, Szoke E, Pimenta W, Mitrakou A, Woerle HJ, Gerich J, Van-Haeften T: Different mechanisms for impaired fasting glucose and impaired postprandial glucose tolerance in humans. Diabetes Care 29:1909–1914, 2006
    1. Wasada T, Kuroki H, Katsumori K, Arii H, Sato A, Aoki K, Jimba S, Hanai G: Who are more insulin resistant, people with IFG or people with IGT? Diabetologia 47:759–760, 2004
    1. Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Fuecker K, Henkel E, Schaper F, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T: Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity pattern is different in isolated impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose: the risk factor in impaired glucose tolerance for atherosclerosis and diabetes study. Diabetes Care 26:868–874, 2003
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M: Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 344:1343–1350, 2001
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM, Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393–403, 2002
    1. Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Thomsen TF, Ibsen H, Glümer C, Charlotta P: A randomized non-pharmacological intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease: baseline results Inter99. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab 10:377–386, 2003
    1. Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Denmark: The Inter99 Study [Internet], 2008. Available from . Accessed 14 October 2008
    1. World Health Organization: Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1999
    1. von Huth Smith L, Borch-Johnsen K, Jørgensen T: Commuting physical activity is favourably associated with biological risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Eur J Epidemiol 22:771–779, 2007
    1. Toft U, Kristoffersen LH, Lau C, Borch-Johnsen K, Jørgensen T: The Dietary Quality Score: validation and association with cardiovascular risk factors: the Inter99 study. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:270–278, 2006
    1. Thomsen TF, Davidsen M, Ibsen H, Jørgensen T, Jensen G, Borch-Johnsen K: A new method for CHD prediction and prevention based on regional risk scores and randomized clinical trials; PRECARD and the Copenhagen Risk Score. J Cardiovasc Risk 8:291–297, 2001
    1. Gutt M, Davis CL, Spitzer SB, Llabre MM, Kumar M, Czarnecki EM, Schneiderman N, Skyler JS, Marks JB: Validation of the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120): comparison with other measures. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 47:177–184, 2000
    1. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419, 1985
    1. Stumvoll M, Mitrakou A, Pimenta W, Jenssen T, Yki-Jarvinen H, Van Haeften T, Renn W, Gerich J: Use of the oral glucose tolerance test to assess insulin release and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 23:295–301, 2000
    1. Williams JW, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE, De-Court, Cameron AJ, Chitson P, Tuomilehto J, Alberti KGMM: Gender differences in the prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in Mauritius: does sex matter? Diabet Med 20:915–920, 2003
    1. Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ, Dunstan DW, Cameron AJ, Welborn TA, Shaw JE: Differences in height explain gender differences in the response to the oral glucose tolerance test—the AusDiab study. Diabet Med 25:296–302, 2008
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study 16: overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes 44:1249–1258, 1995
    1. Chang-Chen KJ, Mullur R, Bernal-Mizrachi E: β-Cell failure as a complication of diabetes. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 9:329–343, 2008
    1. Mooy JM, Grootenhuis PA, de Vries H, Kostense PJ, Popp-Snijders C, Bouter LM, Heine RJ: Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia 39:298–305, 1996

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner