Complication rate of autologous cartilage microtia reconstruction: a systematic review

Xiao Long, Nanze Yu, Jiuzuo Huang, Xiaojun Wang, Xiao Long, Nanze Yu, Jiuzuo Huang, Xiaojun Wang

Abstract

Background: Autologous cartilage has been widely accepted as the frame material of ear reconstruction for patients with microtia. Although rare, there are multiple complications related with the surgical reconstruction techniques. The authors performed a systematic review of the English literature of microtia reconstruction to determine significant surgical factors that are predictors of postoperative complications.

Methods: A PubMed search using the terms "ear reconstruction" and "microtia" was conducted. Articles were screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collected included patient characteristics, surgical techniques, the incidence of all kinds of complications, and the specific postoperative morbidity. Patient cohorts were pooled, and the incidence of complications was calculated. Significant predictors such as the use of tissue expander, simultaneously mid-ear reconstruction, with/without skin graft, and different fascia coverage were analyzed by chi-square test.

Result: Of 320 articles found, 60 met the inclusion criteria. Totally 9415 patients with microtia were analyzed in this review with 1525 cases with complications. The overall complication incidence is 16.2% in average with a range of 0-72.9%. There was no significant difference when comparing the overall complication rate between with/without preexpansion 2-stage and multiple-stage techniques or with/without mid-ear reconstruction simultaneously.

Conclusion: Although there is little agreement in literature regarding risk factors for complications, the authors were able to demonstrate several significant predictors by systematically analyzing 60 articles. Improved knowledge of the incidence of different complications related with various surgical methods can help surgeons provide improved preoperative counseling and take measures to minimize the risk.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study attrition diagram.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Complication rate of nonexpansion and preexpanded group.

References

    1. Daniel DI, Boris P, David AS, et al. Current management of microtia—a national survey. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:402–408.
    1. Khansa I, Momoh AO, Patel PP, et al. Fat necrosis in autologous abdomen-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:443–452.
    1. Tai Y, Tanaka S, Fukushima J, et al. Refinements in the elevation of reconstructed auricles in microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2414–2423.
    1. Kobayashi S, Maegawa J. Ear elevation using 2-tiered costal cartilage on the same side as the reconstructed framework. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1796–1799.
    1. Lim SY, Mun GH, Hyon WS, et al. The elevation of the constructed auricle with a temporoparietal fascial flap wrapping a resorbable plate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:505–509.
    1. Jiang H, Pan B, Zhao Y, et al. A 2-stage ear reconstruction for microtia. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13:162–166.
    1. Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:187–201.
    1. Yotsuyanagi T, Yokoi K, Urushidate S, et al. A supportive technique using a splint to obtain definite contour and desirable protrusion after reconstruction of microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1051–1055.
    1. Brent B. Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal experience with 1200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:319–334. discussion 335.
    1. Siegert R. Combined reconstruction of congenital auricular atresia and severe microtia. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;68:95–107.
    1. Siegert R. Combined reconstruction of congenital auricular atresia and severe microtia. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:2021–2027. discussion 2028.
    1. Siegert R, Weerda H. Two-step external ear canal construction in atresia as part of auricular reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(4 Pt 1):708–714.
    1. Ono I. Therapeutic effect of using a long-pulsed alexandrite laser system with a cooling device for epilation in reconstructive surgery of auricular malformations. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48:115–123.
    1. Brent B. Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:355–374; discussion 375.
    1. Aguilar EF. Auricular reconstruction in congenital anomalies of the ear. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001;9:159–169.
    1. Osorno G. A 20-year experience with the Brent technique of auricular reconstruction: pearls and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1447–1463.
    1. Cho BC, Lee SH. Surgical results of two-stage reconstruction of the auricle in congenital microtia using an autogenous costal cartilage alone or combined with canaloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:936–947.
    1. Park C. Subfascial expansion and expanded two-flap method for microtia reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1473–1487.
    1. Hata Y. Do not forget the fundamental merits of microtia repair using a tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:819–822.
    1. Spina V, Kamakura L, Psillakis JM. Total reconstruction of the ear in congenital microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:349–357.
    1. Brent B. The correction of microtia with autogenous cartilage grafts: II. Atypical and complex deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:13–21.
    1. Ohara K, Nakamura K, Ohta E. Chest wall deformities and thoracic scoliosis after costal cartilage graft harvesting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1030–1036.
    1. Sakamoto A, Kiyokawa K, Rikimaru H, et al. An investigation of the fixation materials for cartilage frames in microtia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:584–589.
    1. Chen Z, Zhang W, Huang J, et al. Exceedingly expanded retroauricular flaps for microtia reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1448–1453.
    1. Zhang Q, Quan Y, Su Y, et al. Expanded retroauricular skin and fascial flap in congenital microtia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:428–434.
    1. Liu J, Sun J, Li X. Total auricular reconstruction without skin grafting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1312–1317.
    1. Zou YH, Zhuang HX, Wang SJ, et al. Satisfactory surgical option for congenital microtia with defects of external auditory meatus (EAM) and middle ear. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127:705–710.
    1. Zhou X, Zhang Q, Liu T, et al. Modification in the technique of ear framework fabrication for congenital microtia. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1296–1300.
    1. Pan B, Jiang H, Guo D, et al. Microtia: ear reconstruction using tissue expander and autogenous costal cartilage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(Suppl 1):S98–103.
    1. Wang Y, Zhuang X, Jiang H, et al. The anatomy and application of the postauricular fascia flap in auricular reconstruction for congenital microtia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(Suppl 1):S70–S76.
    1. Liu X, Zhang Q, Quan Y, et al. Bilateral microtia reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1275–1278.
    1. Jing C, Hong-Xing Z. Partial necrosis of expanding postauricular flaps during auricle reconstruction: risk factors and effective management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1759–1766.
    1. Dashan Y, Haiyue J, Qinghua Y, et al. Technical innovations in ear reconstruction using a skin expander with autogenous cartilage grafts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(Suppl 1):S59–S69.
    1. Jiang H, Pan B, Lin L, et al. Ten-year experience in microtia reconstruction using tissue expander and autogenous cartilage. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72:1251–1259.
    1. Tanino R, Miyasaka M. Reconstruction of microtia using tissue expander. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:339–353.
    1. Park C. Balanced auricular reconstruction in dystopic microtia with the presence of the external auditory canal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1489–1500. discussion 1501.
    1. Aguilar EF., 3rd Auricular reconstruction of congenital microtia (grade III). Laryngoscope. 1996;106(12 Pt 2 Suppl 82):1–26.
    1. Osorno G. Autogenous rib cartilage reconstruction of congenital ear defects: report of 110 cases with Brent’s technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1951–1962. discussion 1963.
    1. Zhao S, Wang D, Han D, et al. Integrated protocol of auricle reconstruction combined with hearing reconstruction. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132:829–833.
    1. Yellon RF. Combined atresiaplasty and tragal reconstruction for microtia and congenital aural atresia: thesis for the American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:245–254.
    1. Boudard P, Benassayag C, Dhillon RS, et al. Aesthetic surgery for microtia. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1989;246:349–352.
    1. Sabbagh W. Early experience in microtia reconstruction: the first 100 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:452–458.
    1. Nakai H. Reconstruction of microtia. Pursuing a natural appearance. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:287–304.
    1. Park C, Lew DH, Yoo WM. An analysis of 123 temporoparietal fascial flaps: anatomic and clinical considerations in total auricular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1295–1306.
    1. Park C. Modification of two-flap method and framework construction for reconstruction of atypical congenital auricular deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1846–1857.
    1. Song Y, Song Y. An improved one-stage total ear reconstruction procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71:615–623.
    1. Thomson HG, Kim TY, Ein SH. Residual problems in chest donor sites after microtia reconstruction: a long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:961–968.
    1. Leach JL, Jr, Jordan JA, Brown KR, et al. Techniques for improving ear definition in microtia reconstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;48:39–46.
    1. Chin WS, Zhang R, Zhang Q, et al. Techniques for improving tragus definition in auricular reconstruction with autogenous costal cartilage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:541–544.
    1. Zhang Q, Zhang R, Xu F, et al. Firm elevation of the reconstructed auricle with a retroauricular fascial flap wrapping an EH (a mixture of epoxide acrylate malelic and hydroxyapatite) composite wedge. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1452–1458.
    1. Zhang Q, Zhang R, Xu F, et al. Auricular reconstruction for microtia: personal 6-year experience based on 350 microtia ear reconstructions in China. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:849–858.
    1. Tanzer RC. Microtia—a long-term follow-up of 44 reconstructed auricles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61:161–166.
    1. Chauhan DS, Guruprasad Y. Auricular reconstruction of congenital microtia using autogenous costal cartilage: report of 27 cases. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11:47–52.
    1. Jiang H, Pan B, Lin L, et al. Fabrication of three-dimensional cartilaginous framework in auricular reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(Suppl 1):S77–S85.
    1. Breugem CC, Stewart KJ, Kon M. International trends in the treatment of microtia. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1367–1369.
    1. Chen J, Yang Q, Wang X, et al. Fabrication of a three-dimensional autogenous costal cartilage framework in auricular reconstruction: experience with 250 cases of Asian lobule-type microtia. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37:901–908.
    1. Firmin F. Ear reconstruction in cases of typical microtia. Personal experience based on 352 microtic ear corrections. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998;32:35–47.
    1. Quatela VC, Goldman ND. Microtia repair. Facial Plast Surg. 1995;11:257–273.
    1. Jiang H, Pan B, Lin L, et al. Lifting the reconstructed ear using remnant ear cartilage in lobule-type microtia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:273–277.
    1. Cho BC, Kim JY, Byun JS. Two-stage reconstruction of the auricle in congenital microtia using autogenous costal cartilage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:998–1006.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner