PIRATE project: point-of-care, informatics-based randomised controlled trial for decreasing overuse of antibiotic therapy in Gram-negative bacteraemia

Angela Huttner, Werner C Albrich, Pierre-Yves Bochud, Angèle Gayet-Ageron, Anne Rossel, Elodie von Dach, Stephan Harbarth, Laurent Kaiser, Angela Huttner, Werner C Albrich, Pierre-Yves Bochud, Angèle Gayet-Ageron, Anne Rossel, Elodie von Dach, Stephan Harbarth, Laurent Kaiser

Abstract

Introduction: Antibiotic overuse drives antibiotic resistance. The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for Gram-negative bacteraemia (GNB), a common community and hospital-associated infection, remains unknown and unstudied via randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods and analysis: This investigator-initiated, multicentre, non-inferiority, informatics-based point-of-care RCT will randomly assign adult hospitalised patients receiving microbiologically efficacious antibiotic(s) for GNB to (1) 14 days of antibiotic therapy, (2) 7 days of therapy or (3) an individualised duration determined by clinical response and 75% reduction in peak C reactive protein (CRP) values. The randomisation will occur in equal proportions (1:1:1) on day 5 (±1) of efficacious antibiotic therapy as determined by antibiogram; patients, their physicians and study investigators will be blind to treatment duration allocation until the day of antibiotic discontinuation. Immunosuppressed patients and those with GNB due to complicated infections (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, etc) and/or non-fermenting bacilli (Acinetobacter spp, Burkholderia spp, Pseudomonas spp) Brucella spp, Fusobacterium spp or polymicrobial growth with Gram-positive organisms will be ineligible. The primary outcome is incidence of clinical failure at day 30; secondary outcomes include clinical failure, all-cause mortality and incidence of Clostridiumdifficile infection in the 90-day study period. An interim safety analysis will be performed after the first 150 patients have been followed for ≤30 days. Given a chosen margin of 10%, the required sample size to determine non-inferiority is roughly 500 patients. Analyses will be performed on both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the cantonal ethics committees of all three participating sites. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number: This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03101072; pre-results).

Keywords: Antibiotic Therapy; Bacteraemia; Duration; Gram-negative; Point-of-care Randomization.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial sites: the HUG is the principal site; CHUV and KSSG are participating peripheral sites. CHUV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois; HUG, Geneva University Hospitals; KSSG, Catonal Hospital St Gallen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial flow: day 1 is defined as the first day of microbiologically appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients will be randomised on day 5 (±1) and followed until day 90.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Electronic-healthcare record workflow for patient identification, randomisation and follow-up in Geneva. The EHR workflow is outlined in red, the control (‘back-up’) workflow in grey. Grey arrows indicate safety valves; these cover all points at which the EHR workflow could malfunction. In this hypothetical case, the patient has been randomised to the control arm (antibiotic therapy duration of 14 days). EHR, electronic health record.

References

    1. Huttner A, Harbarth S, Carlet J, et al. . Antimicrobial resistance: a global view from the 2013 World Healthcare-Associated Infections Forum. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2013;2:31.10.1186/2047-2994-2-31
    1. WHO Antimicrobial Fact Sheet. 2015. .
    1. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health: responses to the antimicrobial resistance threat. 2015. .
    1. Holmes AH, Moore LS, Sundsfjord A, et al. . Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 2016;387:176–87.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00473-0
    1. Zarkotou O, Pournaras S, Tselioti P, et al. . Predictors of mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17:1798–803.10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03514.x
    1. Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, et al. . PneumA Trial Group. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;290:2588–98.10.1001/jama.290.19.2588
    1. Havey TC, Fowler RA, Daneman N. Duration of antibiotic therapy for bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2011;15:R267.10.1186/cc10545
    1. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1–45.10.1086/599376
    1. Sandberg T, Skoog G, Hermansson AB, et al. . Ciprofloxacin for 7 days versus 14 days in women with acute pyelonephritis: a randomised, open-label and double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;380:484–90.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60608-4
    1. Tellier G, Niederman MS, Nusrat R, et al. . Clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety of 5 and 7 day regimens of telithromycin once daily compared with a 10 day regimen of clarithromycin twice daily in patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54:515–23.10.1093/jac/dkh356
    1. File TM, Mandell LA, Tillotson G, et al. . Gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days versus 7 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, multicentre, double-blind study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:112–20.10.1093/jac/dkm119
    1. Dunbar LM, Wunderink RG, Habib MP, et al. . High-dose, short-course levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: a new treatment paradigm. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:752–60.10.1086/377539
    1. Runyon BA, McHutchison JG, Antillon MR, et al. . Short-course versus long-course antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. A randomized controlled study of 100 patients. Gastroenterology 1991;100:1737–42.
    1. Chaudry ZI, Nisar S, Ahmed U. Short course of antibiotic treatment in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a randomized controlled study. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2000;10:284–8.
    1. Hepburn MJ, Dooley DP, Skidmore PJ, et al. . Comparison of short-course (5 days) and standard (10 days) treatment for uncomplicated cellulitis. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1669–74.10.1001/archinte.164.15.1669
    1. Oliveira CF, Botoni FA, Oliveira CR, et al. . Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for guiding antibiotic therapy in sepsis: a randomized trial. Crit Care Med 2013;41:2336–43.10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e969f
    1. Adamina M, Steffen T, Tarantino I, et al. . Meta-analysis of the predictive value of C-reactive protein for infectious complications in abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2015;102:590–8.10.1002/bjs.9756
    1. Lin KH, Wang FL, Wu MS, et al. . Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;80:72–8.10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.029
    1. Torres A, Ramirez P, Montull B, et al. . Biomarkers and community-acquired pneumonia: tailoring management with biological data. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2012;33:266–71.10.1055/s-0032-1315638
    1. Nobre V, Harbarth S, Graf JD, et al. . Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:498–505.10.1164/rccm.200708-1238OC
    1. Wacker C, Prkno A, Brunkhorst FM, et al. . Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:426–35.10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70323-7
    1. Uçkay I, Garzoni C, Ferry T, et al. . Postoperative serum pro-calcitonin and C-reactive protein levels in patients with orthopedic infections. Swiss Med Wkly 2010;140:w13124.10.4414/smw.2010.13124
    1. Havey TC, Fowler RA, Pinto R, et al. . Duration of antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with bloodstream infections: A retrospective cohort study. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2013;24:129–37.10.1155/2013/141989
    1. Corona A, Wilson AP, Grassi M, et al. . Prospective audit of bacteraemia management in a university hospital ICU using a general strategy of short-course monotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54:809–17.10.1093/jac/dkh416
    1. Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, et al. . PRORATA trial group. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:463–74.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61879-1
    1. de Jong E, van Oers JA, Beishuizen A, et al. . Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:819–27.10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00053-0
    1. Albrich WC, Harbarth S. Pros and cons of using biomarkers versus clinical decisions in start and stop decisions for antibiotics in the critical care setting. Intensive Care Med 2015;41:1739–51.10.1007/s00134-015-3978-8
    1. Schuetz P, Briel M, Christ-Crain M, et al. . Procalcitonin to guide initiation and duration of antibiotic treatment in acute respiratory infections: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:651–62.10.1093/cid/cis464
    1. Reinhart K, Bauer M, Riedemann NC, et al. . New approaches to Sepsis: molecular diagnostics and biomarkers. Clin Microbiol Rev 2012;25:609–34.10.1128/CMR.00016-12
    1. Fitzpatrick JM, Biswas JS, Edgeworth JD, et al. . Gram-negative bacteraemia; a multi-centre prospective evaluation of empiric antibiotic therapy and outcome in English acute hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016;22:244–51.10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.034
    1. Angus DC, Seymour CW, Coopersmith CM, et al. . A framework for the Development and Interpretation of Different Sepsis definitions and clinical criteria. Crit Care Med 2016;44:e113–e121.10.1097/CCM.0000000000001730
    1. Pittet D, Li N, Wenzel RP. Association of secondary and polymicrobial nosocomial bloodstream infections with higher mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1993;12:813–9.10.1007/BF02000400
    1. Detry MA, Lewis RJ. The intention-to-treat principle: how to assess the true effect of choosing a medical treatment. JAMA 2014;312:85–6.10.1001/jama.2014.7523
    1. Food & Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials 1998. .
    1. Chenaud C, Merlani P, Luyasu S, et al. . Informed consent for research obtained during the intensive care unit stay. Crit Care 2006;10:R170.10.1186/cc5120
    1. Paul M, Bronstein E, Yahav D, et al. . External validity of a randomised controlled trial on the treatment of severe infections caused by MRSA. BMJ Open 2015;5:e00883810.1136/bmjopen-2015-008838
    1. Balajonda N, Bisanar TL, Mathew JP, et al. . Determinants of a subject's decision to participate in clinical anesthesia research. Anesth Analg 2013;116:448–54.10.1213/ANE.0b013e318277dd7d
    1. Gayet-Ageron A, Rudaz S, Perneger T. Biobank attributes associated with higher patient participation: a randomized study. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;25:31–6.10.1038/ejhg.2016.132
    1. Knoester PD, Belitser SV, Deckers CL, et al. . Recruitment of a cohort of lamotrigine users through community pharmacists: differences between patients who gave informed consent and those who did not. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005;14:107–12.10.1002/pds.992
    1. Beebe TJ, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins SM, et al. . Who doesn't authorize the linking of survey and administrative health data? A general population-based investigation. Ann Epidemiol 2011;21:706–9.10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.03.007
    1. Huang N, Shih SF, Chang HY, et al. . Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents? BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:18.10.1186/1472-6963-7-18

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner