Design of the Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial (VENT): a non-surgical method of lung volume reduction

Charlie Strange, Felix J F Herth, Kevin L Kovitz, Geoffrey McLennan, Armin Ernst, Jonathan Goldin, Marc Noppen, Gerard J Criner, Frank C Sciurba, VENT Study Group, Charlie Strange, Felix J F Herth, Kevin L Kovitz, Geoffrey McLennan, Armin Ernst, Jonathan Goldin, Marc Noppen, Gerard J Criner, Frank C Sciurba, VENT Study Group

Abstract

Background: Lung volume reduction surgery is effective at improving lung function, quality of life, and mortality in carefully selected individuals with advanced emphysema. Recently, less invasive bronchoscopic approaches have been designed to utilize these principles while avoiding the associated perioperative risks. The Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema PalliatioN Trial (VENT) posits that occlusion of a single pulmonary lobe through bronchoscopically placed Zephyr endobronchial valves will effect significant improvements in lung function and exercise tolerance with an acceptable risk profile in advanced emphysema.

Methods: The trial design posted on Clinical trials.gov, on August 10, 2005 proposed an enrollment of 270 subjects. Inclusion criteria included: diagnosis of emphysema with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 45% of predicted, hyperinflation (total lung capacity measured by body plethysmography > 100%; residual volume > 150% predicted), and heterogeneous emphysema defined using a quantitative chest computed tomography algorithm. Following standardized pulmonary rehabilitation, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive unilateral lobar placement of endobronchial valves plus optimal medical management or optimal medical management alone. The co-primary endpoint was the mean percent change in FEV1 and six minute walk distance at 180 days. Secondary end-points included mean percent change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score and the mean absolute changes in the maximal work load measured by cycle ergometry, dyspnea (mMRC) score, and total oxygen use per day. Per patient response rates in clinically significant improvement/maintenance of FEV1 and six minute walk distance and technical success rates of valve placement were recorded. Apriori response predictors based on quantitative CT and lung physiology were defined.

Conclusion: If endobronchial valves improve FEV1 and health status with an acceptable safety profile in advanced emphysema, they would offer a novel intervention for this progressive and debilitating disease.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00129584.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Zephyr® Endobronchial Valve side view.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Implanted Zephyr® Endobronchial Valve end view. The Zephyr® Endobronchial Valve vents during expiration (left) and seals during inspiration (right) immediately after placement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lobar treatment targeting algorithm. A single lobe for treatment is selected by determining the highest emphysema score (ES). If emphysema scores are identical between lobes on both lungs, then the lung with the most heterogeneity is selected. The heterogeneity score (HS) is derived by subtracting the best lobe score from the worst lobe score in a single lung. If both lungs are equally affected with emphysema and heterogeneity, the computer generated absolute % density score (DS) is used to select the most affected lobe for targeting.

References

    1. Halbert RJ, Natoli JL, Gano A, Badamgarav E, Buist AS, Mannino DM. Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:523–532. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00124605.
    1. Sciurba FC, Rogers RM, Keenan RJ, Slivka WA, Gorcsan J, 3rd, Ferson PF, Holbert JM, Brown ML, Landreneau RJ. Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after lung-reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334:1095–1099. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604253341704.
    1. Martinez FJ, de Oca MM, Whyte RI, Stetz J, Gay SE, Celli BR. Lung-volume reduction improves dyspnea, dynamic hyperinflation, and respiratory muscle function. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1997;155:1984–1990.
    1. Sabanathan A, Sabanathan S, Shah R, Richardson J. Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. A review. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 1998;39:237–243.
    1. Geddes D, Davies M, Koyama H, Hansell D, Pastorino U, Pepper J, Agent P, Cullinan P, MacNeill SJ, Goldstraw P. Effect of lung-volume-reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;343:239–245. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007273430402.
    1. Gelb AF, McKenna RJ, Jr., Brenner M, Schein MJ, Zamel N, Fischel R. Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. Chest. 1999;116:1608–1615. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1608.
    1. Fishman A, Martinez F, Naunheim K, Piantadosi S, Wise R, Ries A, Weinmann G, Wood DE. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;348:2059–2073. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030287.
    1. Wan IY, Toma TP, Geddes DM, Snell G, Williams T, Venuta F, Yim AP. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for end-stage emphysema: report on the first 98 patients. Chest. 2006;129:518–526. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.3.518.
    1. Leroy S, Marquette CH. [VENT: International study of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction as a palliative treatment for emphysema] Revue des maladies respiratoires. 2004;21:1144–1152.
    1. FDA Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee; Emphysema and ablation devices clinical issues discussion session. General and Plastic Surgery Devices.
    1. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1988;75:800–802. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.4.800.
    1. Bankier AA, De Maertelaer V, Keyzer C, Gevenois PA. Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. Radiology. 1999;211:851–858.
    1. Goddard PR, Nicholson EM, Laszlo G, Watt I. Computed tomography in pulmonary emphysema. Clinical radiology. 1982;33:379–387. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(82)80301-2.
    1. Bergin C, Muller N, Nichols DM, Lillington G, Hogg JC, Mullen B, Grymaloski MR, Osborne S, Pare PD. The diagnosis of emphysema. A computed tomographic-pathologic correlation. The American review of respiratory disease. 1986;133:541–546.
    1. GOLD . NHLBI/ WHO Workshop Report. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; 2001.
    1. Ries AL, Make BJ, Lee SM, Krasna MJ, Bartels M, Crouch R, Fishman AP. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in the national emphysema treatment trial. Chest. 2005;128:3799–3809. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3799.
    1. Redelmeier DA, Bayoumi AM, Goldstein RS, Guyatt GH. Interpreting small differences in functional status: the Six Minute Walk test in chronic lung disease patients. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1997;155:1278–1282.
    1. Redelmeier DA, Goldstein RS, Min ST, Hyland RH. Spirometry and dyspnea in patients with COPD. When small differences mean little. Chest. 1996;109:1163–1168.
    1. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Wanger J. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–968. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205.
    1. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Second. New York , John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
    1. Toma TP, Hopkinson NS, Hillier J, Hansell DM, Morgan C, Goldstraw PG, Polkey MI, Geddes DM. Bronchoscopic volume reduction with valve implants in patients with severe emphysema. Lancet. 2003;361:931–933. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12762-6.
    1. Hopkinson NS, Toma TP, Hansell DM, Goldstraw P, Moxham J, Geddes DM, Polkey MI. Effect of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction on dynamic hyperinflation and exercise in emphysema. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2005;171:453–460. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200407-961OC.
    1. Venuta F, de Giacomo T, Rendina EA, Ciccone AM, Diso D, Perrone A, Parola D, Anile M, Coloni GF. Bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction with one-way valves in patients with heterogenous emphysema. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2005;79:411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.048. discussion 416-417.
    1. de Oliveira HG, Macedo-Neto AV, John AB, Jungblut S, Prolla JC, Menna-Barreto SS, Fortis EA. Transbronchoscopic pulmonary emphysema treatment: 1-month to 24-month endoscopic follow-up. Chest. 2006;130:190–199. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.1.190.
    1. Morrell NW, Wignall BK, Biggs T, Seed WA. Collateral ventilation and gas exchange in emphysema. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1994;150:635–641.
    1. Kaplan RM, Atkins CJ, Timms R. Validity of a quality of well-being scale as an outcome measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of chronic diseases. 1984;37:85–95. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90050-X.
    1. Barr JT, Schumacher GE, Freeman S, LeMoine M, Bakst AW, Jones PW. American translation, modification, and validation of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Clinical therapeutics. 2000;22:1121–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80089-2.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner