Integrating oral PrEP delivery among African women in a large HIV endpoint-driven clinical trial

Ivana Beesham, Julia D Welch, Renee Heffron, Melanie Pleaner, Lara Kidoguchi, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Khatija Ahmed, Deborah Baron, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Cheryl Louw, Timothy D Mastro, Jennifer Smit, Joanne R Batting, Mookho Malahleha, Veronique C Bailey, Mags Beksinska, Deborah Donnell, Jared M Baeten, ECHO Trial Consortium, James Kiarie, Nelly R Mugo, Helen Rees, Jessica Justman, Zelda Nhlabatsi, Maricianah Onono, Linda-Gail Bekker, Gonasagrie Nair, G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Jennifer Smit, Sydney Sibiya, Jeffrey Stringer, Peter B Gichangi, Kate B Heller, Nomthandazo Mbandazayo, Charles S Morrison, Kavita Nanda, Caitlin W Scoville, Kathleen Shears, Petrus S Steyn, Douglas Taylor, Katherine K Thomas, Raesibe Agnes Pearl Selepe, Margaret Phiri Kasaro, Ivana Beesham, Julia D Welch, Renee Heffron, Melanie Pleaner, Lara Kidoguchi, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Khatija Ahmed, Deborah Baron, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Cheryl Louw, Timothy D Mastro, Jennifer Smit, Joanne R Batting, Mookho Malahleha, Veronique C Bailey, Mags Beksinska, Deborah Donnell, Jared M Baeten, ECHO Trial Consortium, James Kiarie, Nelly R Mugo, Helen Rees, Jessica Justman, Zelda Nhlabatsi, Maricianah Onono, Linda-Gail Bekker, Gonasagrie Nair, G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Jennifer Smit, Sydney Sibiya, Jeffrey Stringer, Peter B Gichangi, Kate B Heller, Nomthandazo Mbandazayo, Charles S Morrison, Kavita Nanda, Caitlin W Scoville, Kathleen Shears, Petrus S Steyn, Douglas Taylor, Katherine K Thomas, Raesibe Agnes Pearl Selepe, Margaret Phiri Kasaro

Abstract

Introduction: Global guidelines emphasize the ethical obligation of investigators to help participants in HIV-endpoint trials reduce HIV risk by offering an optimal HIV prevention package. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has increasingly become part of state-of-the-art HIV prevention. Here we describe the process of integrating oral PrEP delivery into the HIV prevention package of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial.

Methods: ECHO was an open-label randomized clinical trial that compared HIV incidence among women randomized to one of three effective contraceptives. In total, 7830 women aged 16 to 35 years from 12 sites in four African countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa and Zambia) were enrolled and followed for 12 to 18 months, from 2015 to 2018. Part-way through the course of the trial, oral PrEP was provided to study participants either off-site via referral or on site via trained trial staff. PrEP uptake was compared between different contraceptive users using Chi-squared tests or t-tests. HIV seroincidence rates were compared between participants who never versus ever initiated PrEP using exact Poisson regression.

Results: PrEP access in ECHO began through public availability in Kenya in May 2017 and was available at all sites by June 2018. When PrEP became available, 3626 (46.3%) eligible women were still in follow-up in the study, and of these, 622 (17.2%) initiated PrEP. Women initiating PrEP were slightly older; more likely to be unmarried, not living with their partner, having multiple partners; and less likely to be earning their own income and receiving financial support from partners (all p < 0.05). PrEP initiation did not differ across study randomized groups (p = 0.7). Two-thirds of PrEP users were continuing PrEP at study exit.

Conclusions: There is a need for improved HIV prevention services in clinical trials with HIV endpoints, especially trials among African women. PrEP as a component of a comprehensive HIV prevention package provided to women in a large clinical trial is practical and feasible. Provision of PrEP within clinical trials with HIV outcomes should be standard of prevention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02550067.

Keywords: HIV; clinical trials; pre-exposure prophylaxis; standard of care; women.

© 2020 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PrEP eligibility and initiation in the ECHO Trial. **Of the 643 women who were not eligible, 128 had less than 28 days of follow up at sites that were providing PrEP on‐site and 515 were either pregnant (26) or breastfeeding (489) at all follow up visits when PrEP was available (in sites other than Kenya and Eswatini). PrEP access was defined as beginning in May 2017 for the site in Kenya, in November 2017 for the site in Zambia, in December 2017 for the site in Eswatini, and between March 2018 and June 2018 for the nine sites in South Africa. ECHO, Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes; PrEP, pre‐exposure prophylaxis.

References

    1. UNAIDS, WHO . Ethical considerations in biomedical HIV prevention trials: guidance document [Additional guidance point added in 2012]. 2012. [cited Sep 2 2019]. Available from:
    1. UNAIDS, AIDS. Vaccine Advocacy Coalition . Good participatory practice: guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials 2011 [cited Sep 2 2019]. Available from:
    1. Haire B, Folayan MO, Hankins C, Sugarman J, Mccormack S, Ramjee G, et al. Ethical considerations in determining standard of prevention packages for HIV prevention trials: examining PrEP. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13(2):87–94.
    1. HIV Prevention HIV Prevention Trials Network . Ethics guidance for research. 2009. [cited Feb 20 2020]. Available from:
    1. WHO . Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre‐exposure prophylaxis for HIV. 2015. [cited July 5 2019]. Available from:
    1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.
    1. Ministry of Health, Kenya . National AIDS & STI control programme [cited Aug 3 2019]. Available from:
    1. National Department of Health, South Africa . PrEP implementation pack: South Africa 2016–2017 [cited Jun 21 2019]. Available from:
    1. Treatment Action Group (TAG) . HIV research in the era of PrEP: the implications of TDF/FTC for biomedical prevention trials. 2017. [cited Aug 10 2019]. Available from:
    1. Janes H, Donnell D, Gilbert PB, Brown ER, Nason M. Viewpoint Taking stock of the present and looking ahead: envisioning challenges in the design of future HIV prevention efficacy trials. Lancet HIV [Internet]. 2020; 6(7):e475–82.
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Morrison CS, Baeten JM, Chipato T, Donnell D, Gichangi P, et al. Rationale and design of a multi‐center, open‐label, randomised clinical trial comparing HIV incidence and contraceptive benefits in women using three commonly‐used contraceptive methods (the ECHO study). Gates open Res. 2017;1:17.
    1. The Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium . HIV incidence among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: a randomised, multicentre, open‐label trial. Lancet. 2019;394:303–13.
    1. National AIDS & STI Control Programme (NASCOP), Ministry of Health . Framework for the implementation of pre‐exposure prophylaxis of HIV in Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya: NASCOP; 2017 [cited Jun 15 2019]. Available from:
    1. South African Medical Research Council . Executive summary of the summit on the standard of care in clinical trials in low‐middle income settings. 2017. [cited Jun 20 2019]. Available from:
    1. National Department of Health, South Africa . Guidelines for expanding combination prevention and treatment options for sex workers: oral pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and test and treat (T&T). 2016. [cited May 11 2019]. Available from:
    1. OPTIONS Provider Training Package . Effective delivery of oral pre‐exposure prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women [cited Aug 2 2019]. Available from:
    1. Balkus JE, Brown E, Palanee T, Nair G, Gafoor Z, Zhang J, et al. An empiric HIV risk scoring tool to predict HIV‐1 acquisition in African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(3):333–43.
    1. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, et al. Tenofovir‐based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(6):509–18.
    1. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22.
    1. Celum CL, Delany‐Moretlwe S, Baeten JM, van der Straten A, Hosek S, Bukusi EA, et al. HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women in Africa: from efficacy trials to delivery. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(S4):23–9.
    1. WHO . Sexual and reproductive Health: can women who are at high risk of acquiring HIV, safely use hormonal contraception? 2017. [cited Aug 5 2019]. Available from:
    1. Celum C.PrEP use in young African women in HPTN 082: effect of drug level feedback. 10th IAS Conf HIV Sci. Mexico City: 21–24 July 2019.
    1. UNAIDS . UNAIDS, Country factsheets: South Africa. 2018. [cited Aug 15 2019]. Available from:

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner