Radiological changes do not influence clinical mid-term outcome in stemless humeral head replacements with hollow screw fixation: a prospective radiological and clinical evaluation

Philipp R Heuberer, Georg Brandl, Leo Pauzenberger, Brenda Laky, Bernhard Kriegleder, Werner Anderl, Philipp R Heuberer, Georg Brandl, Leo Pauzenberger, Brenda Laky, Bernhard Kriegleder, Werner Anderl

Abstract

Background: Stemless shoulder arthroplasty is a fairly new concept. Clinical and radiological follow-up is essential to prove implant safety and concept. This prospective single-centre study was performed to evaluate the influence of radiological changes on clinical mid-term outcome following stemless humeral head replacement with hollow screw fixation.

Methods: Short- and mid-term radiological and clinical evaluations were performed in 73 consecutive shoulders treated mainly for idiopathic and posttraumatic osteoarthritis with stemless humeral head arthroplasty including 40 hemi- (HSA) and 33 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA). Operating times of stemless implantations were compared to 110 stemmed anatomical shoulder prostheses. Appearances of humeral radiolucencies or radiological signs of osteolysis or stress shielding were assessed on standardized radiographs. Patients' clinical outcome was evaluated using the Constant score and patients' satisfaction was documented.

Results: Radiological changes, detected in 37.0%, did not affect clinical outcome. Constant scores significantly improved from baseline to short and mid-term follow-up (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (96.2%) were satisfied with the procedure. No loosening of the humeral head component was detected during a mean follow-up of 58 months. Operating times were significantly shorter with stemless compared to stemmed implants (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Clinical mid-term outcome after stemless humeral head replacement was not affected by radiological changes.

Trial registration: The institutional review board (St. Vincent Hospital Vienna; 201212_EK01; date of issue: 11.12.2012) approved the study. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02754024 ). Retrospective registration.

Keywords: Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty; Hemiarthroplasty; Mid-term outcome; Radiological and clinical results; Stemless shoulder arthroplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the St. Vincent Hospital Vienna, Austria (201212_EK01). The written informed consent was signed by all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The first (PRH) and senior author (WA) are consultants for Arthrex, Inc. However, the authors have not received any financial payments or other benefits related to the subject of this article. The other authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The stemless humeral head Eclipse prosthesis consists of three components: the anatomical humeral head; the trunion for epiphyseal fixation; and the hollow cage screw for metaphyseal fixation. Published with permission from (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anteroposterior radiographs of the stemless humeral head implant showing five radiographic zones including the superior and inferior interface (zone 1 and 5) and the interfaces around the hollow screw (zones 2, 3, and 4), which were used for the assessment of radiolucency and osteolysis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Anteroposterior radiographs of a seventy-two-year-old woman made immediately after hemi shoulder arthroplasty (a), at the short-term follow-up showing no radiolucency or osteolysis (b), and at the mid-term follow-up showing osteophyte formation superior around the humeral head implant and inferior (c)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Anteroposterior radiographs of a forty-year-old man made immediately after total shoulder arthroplasty (a), at the short-term showing partial osteolysis at the inferior trunion bone interface (b), and at the mid-term follow-up showing stable partial inferior osteolysis and minor superior radiolucency (c)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Clinical outcome between hemi- (HSA; n = 27) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA; n = 26) at baseline (HSA: 38.8 ± 17.0% vs. TSA: 36.6 ± 13.9%, p = 0.594), at short (HSA: 74.0 ± 16.5% vs. TSA: 83.9 ± 14.4%, p = 0.024) and mid-term follow-up (HSA: 73.5 ± 17.3% vs. TSA: 84.2 ± 11.6%, p = 0.011)

References

    1. Bohsali KI, Bois AJ, Wirth MA. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(3):256–269. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00935.
    1. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008) J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(11):1513–1517. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.26938.
    1. Sajadi KR, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD. Revision shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of indications and outcomes. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(2):308–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.016.
    1. Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different? J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(1):19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.05.005.
    1. Farng E, Zingmond D, Krenek L, Soohoo NF. Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(4):557–563. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.005.
    1. Iacobellis C, Berizzi A, Biz C, Camporese A. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients. Musculoskelet Surg. 2015;99(1):39–44. doi: 10.1007/s12306-014-0331-2.
    1. Brunner U, Kohler S. Shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of the sequelae of proximal humerus fractures. Orthopade. 2007;36(11):1037–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00132-007-1157-5.
    1. Kontakis G, Tosounidis T, Galanakis I, Megas P. Prosthetic replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Injury. 2008;39(12):1345–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.09.003.
    1. Levy O, SEA C. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder. 5- to 10-year results with the Copeland mark-2 prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(2):213–221. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.11238.
    1. Pape G, Raiss P, Aldinger PR, Loew M. Comparison of short-term results after CUP prosthesis with cemented glenoid components and total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010;148(6):674–679. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1186202.
    1. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;(214):160-164.
    1. Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C. The constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(2):128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.003.
    1. Cil A, Veillette CJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Schleck C, Cofield RH. Revision of the humeral component for aseptic loosening in arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(1):75–81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.21094.
    1. Raiss P, Edwards TB, Deutsch A, Shah A, Bruckner T, Loew M, Boileau P, Walch G. Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00378.
    1. Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Tauber M, Magosch P. Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(9):1463–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.023.
    1. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(1):26–34. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00004.
    1. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2004;13(6):604–613. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.013.
    1. Churchill RS, Chuinard C, Wiater JM, Friedman R, Freehill M, Jacobson S, Spencer E, Jr, Holloway GB, Wittstein J, Lassiter T, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Simpliciti Canal-sparing shoulder arthroplasty system: a prospective two-year multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(7):552–560. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00181.
    1. Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Teissier J, Zipoli B, Group T Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years' follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(6):847–852. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.009.
    1. Magosch P, Habermeyer P, Bachmaier S, Metcalfe N. Biomechanics of metaphyseal fixed humeral head replacement. Obere Extremität. 2012;7(1):11–16. doi: 10.1007/s11678-011-0150-0.
    1. Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM. Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12(1):35–39. doi: 10.1067/mse.2003.22.
    1. Gonzalez JF, Alami GB, Baque F, Walch G, Boileau P. Complications of unconstrained shoulder prostheses. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(4):666–682. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.017.
    1. Sperling JW, Hawkins RJ, Walch G, Mahoney AP, Zuckerman JD. Complications in total shoulder arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:135–141.
    1. Russell LA. Osteoporosis and orthopedic surgery: effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15(11):371. doi: 10.1007/s11926-013-0371-x.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner