Mechanisms of action of brief alcohol interventions remain largely unknown - a narrative review

Jacques Gaume, Jim McCambridge, Nicolas Bertholet, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Jacques Gaume, Jim McCambridge, Nicolas Bertholet, Jean-Bernard Daeppen

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has shown the efficacy of brief intervention (BI) for hazardous and harmful alcohol use in primary health care settings. Evidence for efficacy in other settings and effectiveness when implemented at larger scale are disappointing. Indeed, BI comprises varying content; exploring BI content and mechanisms of action may be a promising way to enhance efficacy and effectiveness. Medline and PsychInfo, as well as references of retrieved publications were searched for original research or review on active ingredients (components or mechanisms) of face-to-face BIs [and its subtypes, including brief advice and brief motivational interviewing (BMI)] for alcohol. Overall, BI active ingredients have been scarcely investigated, almost only within BMI, and mostly among patients in the emergency room, young adults, and US college students. This body of research has shown that personalized feedback may be an effective component; specific MI techniques showed mixed findings; decisional balance findings tended to suggest a potential detrimental effect; while change plan exercises, advice to reduce or stop drinking, presenting alternative change options, and moderation strategies are promising but need further study. Client change talk is a potential mediator of BMI effects; change in norm perceptions and enhanced discrepancy between current behavior and broader life goals and values have received preliminary support; readiness to change was only partially supported as a mediator; while enhanced awareness of drinking, perceived risks/benefits of alcohol use, alcohol treatment seeking, and self-efficacy were seldom studied and have as yet found no significant support as such. Research is obviously limited and has provided no clear and consistent evidence on the mechanisms of alcohol BI. How BI achieves the effects seen in randomized trials remains mostly unknown and should be investigated to inform the development of more effective interventions.

Keywords: active ingredients; alcohol; brief intervention; components; mechanisms; mediators; motivational interviewing.

References

    1. O’Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, Schulte B, Schmidt C, Reimer J, et al. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: a systematic review of reviews. Alcohol Alcohol (2014) 49(1):66–7810.1093/alcalc/agt170
    1. Kaner E, Bland M, Cassidy P, Coulton S, Dale V, Deluca P, et al. Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2013) 346:e8501.10.1136/bmj.e8501
    1. Butler CC, Simpson SA, Hood K, Cohen D, Pickles T, Spanou C, et al. Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ (2013) 346:f1191.10.1136/bmj.f1191
    1. Chafetz ME. A procedure for establishing therapeutic contact with the alcoholic. Q J Stud Alcohol (1961) 22:325–8
    1. McQueen J, Howe TE, Allan L, Mains D, Hardy V. Brief interventions for heavy alcohol users admitted to general hospital wards. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 8:CD005191.10.1002/14651858.CD005191.pub3
    1. Nilsen P, Baird J, Mello MJ, Nirenberg T, Woolard R, Bendtsen P, et al. A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients. J Subst Abuse Treat (2008) 35(2):184–20110.1016/j.jsat.2007.09.008
    1. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Garey L, Carey MP. Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. Clin Psychol Rev (2012) 32(8):690–70310.1016/j.cpr.2012.08.001
    1. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Carey MP, DeMartini KS. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review. Addict Behav (2007) 32(11):2469–9410.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.004
    1. McCambridge J. Fifty years of brief intervention effectiveness trials for heavy drinkers. Drug Alcohol Rev (2011) 30(6):567–810.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00379.x
    1. Field CA, Baird J, Saitz R, Caetano R, Monti PM. The mixed evidence for brief intervention in emergency departments, trauma care centers, and inpatient hospital settings: what should we do? Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2010) 34(12):2004–1010.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01297.x
    1. Magill M, Longabaugh R. Efficacy combined with specified ingredients: a new direction for empirically supported addiction treatment. Addiction (2013) 108(5):874–8110.1111/add.12013
    1. McCambridge J, Cunningham JA. The early history of ideas on brief interventions for alcohol. Addiction (2014) 109(4):538–4610.1111/add.12458
    1. McCambridge J. Brief intervention content matters. Drug Alcohol Rev (2013) 32(4):339–4110.1111/dar.12044
    1. Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction (1993) 88(3):315–3510.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x
    1. Berglund M, Thelander S, Salaspuro M, Franck J, Andreasson S, Ojehagen A. Treatment of alcohol abuse: an evidence-based review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2003) 27(10):1645–5610.1097/01.ALC.0000090144.99832.19
    1. Cuijpers P, Riper H, Lemmers L. The effects on mortality of brief interventions for problem drinking: a meta-analysis. Addiction (2004) 99(7):839–4510.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00778.x
    1. Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2004) 140(7):557–6810.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00017
    1. Jonas DE, Garbutt JC, Brown JM, Amick HR, Brownley KA, Council CL, et al. Screening, Behavioral Counseling, and Referral in Primary Care to Reduce Alcohol Misuse. Rockville, MD: AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews; (2012).
    1. Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Wietlisbach V, Fleming M, Burnand B. Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med (2005) 165(9):986–9510.1001/archinte.165.9.986
    1. Murphy JG, Benson TA, Vuchinich RE, Deskins MM, Eakin D, Flood AM, et al. A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. J Stud Alcohol (2004) 65(2):200–3
    1. Juarez P, Walters ST, Daugherty M, Radi C. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students. J Drug Educ (2006) 36(3):233–4610.2190/753N-8242-727T-G63L
    1. Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR, Field CA, Jouriles EN. Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol (2009) 77(1):64–7310.1037/a0014472
    1. Cowell AJ, Brown JM, Mills MJ, Bender RH, Wedehase BJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of motivational interviewing with feedback to reduce drinking among a sample of college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs (2012) 73(2):226–37
    1. Janis IL, Mann L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. London: Cassel & Collier Macmillan; (1977).
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot (1997) 12(1):38–4810.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
    1. Collins SE, Carey KB. Lack of effect for decisional balance as a brief motivational intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Addict Behav (2005) 30(7):1425–3010.1016/j.addbeh.2005.01.004
    1. Carey KB, Carey MP, Maisto SA, Henson JM. Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol (2006) 74(5):943–5410.1037/0022-006X.74.5.943
    1. LaBrie JW, Pedersen ER, Earleywine M, Olsen H. Reducing heavy drinking in college males with the decisional balance: analyzing an element of motivational interviewing. Addict Behav (2006) 31(2):254–6310.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.001
    1. Miller WR, Rose GS. Motivational interviewing and decisional balance: contrasting responses to client ambivalence. Behav Cogn Psychother (2013):1–1310.1017/S1352465813000878
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed New York, NY: Guilford Press; (2013).
    1. McNally AM, Palfai TP, Kahler CW. Motivational interventions for heavy drinking college students: examining the role of discrepancy-related psychological processes. Psychol Addict Behav (2005) 19(1):79–8710.1037/0893-164X.19.1.79
    1. Feldstein SW, Forcehimes AA. Motivational interviewing with underage college drinkers: a preliminary look at the role of empathy and alliance. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse (2007) 33(5):737–4610.1080/00952990701522690
    1. Gaume J, Gmel G, Daeppen JB. Brief alcohol interventions: do counsellors’ and patients’ communication characteristics predict change? Alcohol Alcohol (2008) 43(1):62–910.1093/alcalc/agm141
    1. Gaume J, Gmel G, Faouzi M, Daeppen JB. Counselor skill influences outcomes of brief motivational interventions. J Subst Abuse Treat (2009) 37(2):151–910.1016/j.jsat.2008.12.001
    1. Bertholet N, Palfai T, Gaume J, Daeppen JB, Saitz R. Do brief alcohol motivational interventions work like we think they do? Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2014) 38(3):853–910.1111/acer.12274
    1. Gaume J, Magill M, Longabaugh R, Bertholet N, Gmel G, Daeppen JB. Influence of counselor characteristics and behaviors on the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking in young men – a randomized controlled trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2014) 38(7):2138–4710.1111/acer.12469
    1. Tollison SJ, Lee CM, Neighbors C, Neil TA, Olson ND, Larimer ME. Questions and reflections: the use of motivational interviewing microskills in a peer-led brief alcohol intervention for college students. Behav Ther (2008) 39(2):183–9410.1016/j.beth.2007.07.001
    1. Tollison SJ, Mastroleo NR, Mallett KA, Witkiewitz K, Lee CM, Ray AE, et al. The relationship between baseline drinking status, peer motivational interviewing microskills, and drinking outcomes in a brief alcohol intervention for matriculating college students: a replication. Behav Ther (2013) 44(1):137–5110.1016/j.beth.2012.09.002
    1. Magill M, Apodaca TR, Barnett NP, Monti PM. The route to change: within-session predictors of change plan completion in a motivational interview. J Subst Abuse Treat (2010) 38(3):299–30510.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.001
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed New York, NY: Guilford Press; (2002). 428 p.
    1. Lee CS, Baird J, Longabaugh R, Nirenberg TD, Mello MJ, Woolard R. Change plan as an active ingredient of brief motivational interventions for reducing negative consequences of drinking in hazardous drinking emergency-department patients. J Stud Alcohol Drugs (2010) 71(5):726–33
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol (1986) 51:1173–8210.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
    1. Borsari B, Murphy JG, Carey KB. Readiness to change in brief motivational interventions: a requisite condition for drinking reductions? Addict Behav (2009) 34(2):232–510.1016/j.addbeh.2008.10.010
    1. Barnett NP, Apodaca TR, Magill M, Colby SM, Gwaltney C, Rohsenow DJ, et al. Moderators and mediators of two brief interventions for alcohol in the emergency department. Addiction (2010) 105(3):452–6510.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02814.x
    1. Stein LA, Minugh PA, Longabaugh R, Wirtz P, Baird J, Nirenberg TD, et al. Readiness to change as a mediator of the effect of a brief motivational intervention on posttreatment alcohol-related consequences of injured emergency department hazardous drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav (2009) 23(2):185–9510.1037/a0015648
    1. Heather N, McCambridge J, UKATT Research Team Post-treatment stage of change predicts 12-month outcome of treatment for alcohol problems. Alcohol Alcohol (2013) 48(3):329–3610.1093/alcalc/agt006
    1. Bem DJ. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; (1972). p. 1–62
    1. Miller WR, Rose GS. Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. Am Psychol (2009) 64(6):527–3710.1037/a0016830
    1. Baer JS, Beadnell B, Garrett SB, Hartzler B, Wells EA, Peterson PL. Adolescent change language within a brief motivational intervention and substance use outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav (2008) 22(4):570–510.1037/A0013022
    1. Gaume J, Gmel G, Faouzi M, Daeppen JB. Counsellor behaviours and patient language during brief motivational interventions: a sequential analysis of speech. Addiction (2008) 103(11):1793–80010.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02337.x
    1. Bertholet N, Faouzi M, Gmel G, Gaume J, Daeppen JB. Change talk sequence during brief motivational intervention, towards or away from drinking. Addiction (2010) 105(12):2106–1210.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03081.x
    1. Gaume J, Bertholet N, Faouzi M, Gmel G, Daeppen JB. Does change talk during brief motivational interventions with young men predict change in alcohol use? J Subst Abuse Treat (2013) 44(2):177–8510.1016/j.jsat.2012.04.005
    1. Gaume J, Bertholet N, Faouzi M, Gmel G, Daeppen JB. Counselor motivational interviewing skills and young adult change talk articulation during brief motivational interventions. J Subst Abuse Treat (2010) 39(3):272–8110.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.010
    1. Vader AM, Walters ST, Prabhu GC, Houck JM, Field CA. The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav (2010) 24(2):190–710.1037/a0018749
    1. Martens MP, Ferrier AG, Sheehy MJ, Corbett K, Anderson DA, Simmons A. Development of the protective behavioral strategies survey. J Stud Alcohol (2005) 66(5):698–705

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner