Strategies for Empowering activities in Everyday life (SEE 1.0): study protocol for a feasibility study of an Internet-based occupational therapy intervention for people with stroke

Maria Larsson-Lund, Eva Månsson Lexell, Anneli Nyman, Maria Larsson-Lund, Eva Månsson Lexell, Anneli Nyman

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation after stroke seldom focuses on needs related to an active everyday life and the process of change that people must undergo to adapt to an altered capacity and life situation. In particular, occupational therapy in the late phase needs to support clients in adopting sustainable self-initiated management strategies to regain daily activities and an active everyday life. To improve access to rehabilitation, the use of digital solutions has been suggested. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the Internet-based occupational therapy intervention "Strategies for Empowering activities in Everyday life" (SEE, version 1.0). We will investigate the feasibility of the intervention process in terms of acceptability and adherence as well as the most suitable outcome measures to evaluate SEE and improve the knowledge about the potential changes and outcomes of SEE for clients with stroke.

Methods: This feasibility study is based on a pretest posttest design without a control group. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected from clients and staff concurrently embedded in a mixed-method design during the entire study.

Discussion: The project is a first test of a novel Internet-based occupational therapy intervention, and the research will contribute to the continued development and evaluation of the SEE programme. SEE can provide people with strategies in daily activities that can support them to live an active everyday life despite changed capacity and to improve access to rehabilitation interventions.

Trial registration: NCT04588116 . Name of the registry: Strategies Empowering Activities in Everyday Life (SEE 1.0). A Web-based Occupational Therapy Intervention. URL of trial registry record. Date of registry: Trial first posted: October 19, 2020; first submitted: October 2, 2020.

Keywords: Daily activities; Digital e-health solutions; Internet-based rehabilitation; Lifestyle intervention; Occupational therapy; Self-management; Stroke; Tele-rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

References

    1. United Nations . Convention on rights of people with disabilities (UNCRPD) Geneva: United Nations; 2008.
    1. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1035–1042. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33984.
    1. Malinowsky C, Olofsson A, Nyman A, Lund ML. Patterns of participation: facilitating and hindering aspects related to places for activities outside the home after stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27:204–212. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1668958.
    1. Olofsson A, Nyman A, Kassberg AC, Malinowsky C, Larsson LM. Places visited for activities outside the home after stroke: Relationship with the severity of disability. Br J Occup Ther. 2020;83:405–412. doi: 10.1177/0308022619879075.
    1. Olofsson A, Nyman A, Larsson LM. Engagement in occupations outside home - Experiences of people with acquired brain injury. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80:486–493. doi: 10.1177/0308022617709165.
    1. Norlander A, Iwarsson S, Jönsson A-C, Lindgren A, Månsson LE. Living and ageing with stroke: an exploration of conditions influencing participation in social and leisure activities over 15 years. Brain injury. 2018;32:858–866. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1463561.
    1. Eriksson G, Tham K, Borg J. Occupational gaps in everyday life 1-4 years after acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:159–165. doi: 10.1080/16501970500415322.
    1. Olofsson A, Larsson Lund M, Nyman A. Everyday activities outside the home are a struggle: narratives from two persons with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27:194–203. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1495762.
    1. Eriksson G, Tham K. The meaning of occupational gaps in everyday life in the first year after stroke. OTJR: Occup Particip Health. 2010;30:184–192.
    1. Nyman A, Kassberg A-C, Larsson LM. Perceived occupational value: relationships to occupational balance, lifesatisafaction and health in people with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020:1–8.
    1. Mutai H, Wakabayashi A, Suzuki A, Furukawa T. Factors affecting changes in social activities of people with stroke living in the community: follow-up 1 to 3 years after being discharged home. As J Occup Ther. 2020;16:19–27. doi: 10.11596/asiajot.16.19.
    1. Kassberg A-C, Nyman A, Larsson LM. Perceived occupational balance in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43:553–558. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1632940.
    1. Wagman P, Håkansson C, Björklund A. Occupational balance as used in occupational therapy: a concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:322–327. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.596219.
    1. Eklund M, Orban K, Argentzell E, Bejerholm U, Tjörnstrand C, Erlandsson L-K, et al. The linkage between patterns of daily occupations and occupational balance: applications within occupational science and occupational therapy practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:41–56. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1224271.
    1. Eriksson G, Kottorp A, Borg J, Tham K. Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. Rehabil Med. 2009;41:187–194. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0307.
    1. Lund A, Mangset M, Wyller TB, Sveen U. Occupational transaction after stroke constructed as threat and balance. J Occ Sic. 2015;22:146–159. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.770363.
    1. Chemerinski E, Robinson RG, Kosier JT. Improved recovery in activities of daily living associated with remission of poststroke depression. Stroke. 2001;32:113–117. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.1.113.
    1. Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, McPherson K, Hyndman D, Ashburn A. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1555–1566. doi: 10.1080/09638280802639327.
    1. Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: Preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1566–1574. doi: 10.1080/09638280701618588.
    1. Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Using stroke to explore the Life Thread Model: An alternative approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:150–159. doi: 10.1080/09638280701195462.
    1. Gustafsson L, Bootle K. Client and carer experience of transition home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1380–1386. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.740134.
    1. Olofsson A. Möjlighet till aktivitet och delaktighet utanför hemmet för personer med förvärvad hjärnskada. Doktorsavhandling. [In English: Possbilities to occupations and participation outside home for persons with aquired brain injury, Doctoral thesis] Luleå: Luleå university of technology; 2019.
    1. Haggstrom A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:89–95. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0138.
    1. Beckley MN. The influence of the quality and quantity of social support in the promotion of community participation following stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54:215–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00643.x.
    1. Kassberg A-C, Prellwitz M, Larsson LM. The challenge of everyday technologi in the workplace for persons with aquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:272–281. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.734330.
    1. Larsson Lund M, Lovgren Engstrom AL, Lexell J. Response actions to difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:164–175. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.582651.
    1. Nygård L, Ryd C, Astell A, Nedlund A-C, Boger J, Petäjä Leinonen AM, et al. Self-initiated management approaches and strategies in everyday occupations used by people with cognitive impairment. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021; in press.
    1. White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, Pollack M. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1186–1192. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.958620.
    1. Iosa M, Morone G, Fusco A, Bragoni M, Coiro P, Multari M, et al. Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat. 2012; 10.1155/2012/187965
    1. Bernocchi P, Vanoglio F, Baratti D, Morini R, Rocchi S, Luisa A, et al. Home-based telesurveillance and rehabilitation after stroke: a real-life study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:106–115. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2015.1120453.
    1. Tielbur BR, Cella DER, Currie A, Roach JD, Mattingly B, Boone J, et al. Discharge huddle outfitted with mobile technology improves efficiency of transitioning stroke patients into follow-up care. Am J Med Qual. 2015;30:36–44. doi: 10.1177/1062860613510964.
    1. Wildevuur SE, Simonse LW. Information and communication technology–enabled person-centered care for the “big five” chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Int Res. 2015;17:e77.
    1. Whitehead L, Seaton P. The effectiveness of self-management mobile phone and tablet apps in long-term condition management: a systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2016;18:e97.
    1. Chen J, Jin W, Zhang X-X, Xu W, Liu X-N, Ren C-C. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebro Dis. 2015;24:2660–2668. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014.
    1. Zonneveld M, Patomella A-H, Asaba E, Guidetti S. The use of information and communication technology in healthcare to improve participation in everyday life: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:3416–3423. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1592246.
    1. Riksstroke. Stroke och TIA. Årsrapport från Riksstroke 2018. [In english: Stroke and TIA. Annual report from the Swedish Stroke register, Riksstroke 2018] Riksstroke; 2019.
    1. Ullberg T. Perspectives on post-stroke stroke care and outcomes. Analyses based on the 1-year follow-up from Riksstroke, Doctoral dissertation. Lund: Lund university; 2016.
    1. Socialstyrelsen. Utvärdering av vård vid strokeUtvärdering av vård vid stroke – Huvudrapport med förbättringsområden Nationella riktlinjer – Utvärdering 2018[In english: Evaluation of stroke care - Main report with areas for improvement]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm; 2018.
    1. Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. New York: Routledge; 2015.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Method. 2010;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
    1. O’Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J, et al. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibil Stud. 2015;1:32. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y.
    1. Hallingberg B, Turley R, Segrott J, Wight D, Craig P, Moore L, et al. Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance. Pilot Feasbil Stud. 2018;4:104. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0290-8.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350.
    1. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Prom Pract. 2005;6:134–147. doi: 10.1177/1524839904273387.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Internal Med. 2013;158:200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
    1. Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Taylor SJ, Sheikh A, Griffiths CJ, et al. Self-management support interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic meta-review. PloS one. 2015;10:e0131448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131448.
    1. Pearce G, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Parke HL, Heavey E, Griffiths CJ, et al. Experiences of self-management support following a stroke: a meta-review of qualitative systematic reviews. PloS one. 2015;10:e0141803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141803.
    1. Wray F, Clarke D, Forster A. Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2018:401237–51.
    1. Bleijenberg N, Janneke M, Trappenburg JC, Ettema RG, Sino CG, Heim N, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: Enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001.
    1. O'Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Sworn K, Turner KM, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
    1. Doria N, Condran B, Boulos L, Maillet DGC, Dowling L, Levy A. Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research. Res Invol Eng. 2018;4:19.
    1. Larsson Lund M, Månsson Lexell E, Nyman A. Optimizing the development of sustainable internet-based occupational therapy interventions: important key actions and perspectives to consider. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021; in press.
    1. Larsson Lund M, Nygard L, Kottorp A. Percived difficulty in the use of everyday technology in people with aquired brain injury with a special focus on work. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1618–1625. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.863388.
    1. Fallahpour M, Kottorp A, Nygard L, Larsson LM. Participation after acquired brain injury: associations with everyday technology and activities in daily life. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:366–376. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1011229.
    1. Fallahpour M, Tham K, Joghataei MT, Jonsson H. Perceived participation and autonomy: aspects of functioning and contextual factors predicting participation after stroke. J Rehab Med. 2011;43:388–397. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0789.
    1. Erlandsson L-K, Persson C. Valmo-modellen. arbetsterapi för hälsa genom görande. [In english: The Valmo- model. Occupational therapy through doing]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2020.
    1. Eklund M, Gunnarsson B, Hultqvist J. Aktivitet och relation. [In english: Occupation and relation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2020.
    1. Dickie V, Cutchin MP, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: a critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occ Sci. 2006;13:83–93. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573.
    1. Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, Lefeve C, Pachoud B, Ville I. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1555–1565. doi: 10.1080/09638280701618661.
    1. Rogers CR. Significant aspects of client-centered therapy. Am Psychol. 1946;1:415–422. doi: 10.1037/h0060866.
    1. Ranner M, Guidetti S, von Koch L, Tham K. Experiences of participating in a client-centred ADL intervention after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:3025–3033. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1483434.
    1. Ranner M, von Koch L, Guidetti S, Tham K. Client-centred ADL intervention after stroke: occupational therapists’ experiences. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:81–90. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1115549.
    1. Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:797–810. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.511415.
    1. Jones F, Riazi A, Norris M. Self-management after stroke: time for some more questions? Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:257–264. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.691938.
    1. Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:1–7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.
    1. Warner G, Packer T, Villeneuve M, Audulv A, Versnel J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:2141–2163. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.996674.
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The Transtheoretical approach. In Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration, 2nd. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried, M.R., editor. New York: Oxford University Press: 2005. p. 147-171.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Prom. 1997;12:38–48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. New York: Guilford press; 2012.
    1. Lexell J, Fischer MR. Rehabiliteringsmetodik. [In english: Rehabilitation methodology] Studentlitteratur: Lund; 2017.
    1. Moffett J. Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Med Teach. 2015;37:331–336. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.943710.
    1. Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High Edu Res Develop. 2015;34:1–14. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
    1. Låg T, Sæle RG. Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA open. 2019;5:2332858419870489.
    1. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2011;13:e2.
    1. Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Int Res. 2012;14:e152.
    1. Kottorp A, Malinowsky C, Larsson-Lund M, Nygård L. Gender and diagnostic impact on everyday technology use: a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:2688–2694. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1472816.
    1. Malinowsky C, Larsson-Lund M. The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-age people with acquired brain injury to use it. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:26–34. doi: 10.1177/0308022614563943.
    1. Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA. A behavior change model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38:18–27. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4.
    1. Schubart JR, Stuckey HL, Ganeshamoorthy MA, Sciamanna CN. Chronic health conditions and internet behavioral interventions: a review of factors to enhance user engagement. Comp Info Nurs: CIN. 2011;29:81. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182065eed.
    1. Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Int Res. 2010;12:e4.
    1. Lund ML, Lexell J. A positive turning point in life–how persons with late effects of polio experience the influence of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:559–565. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0559.
    1. Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Method. 2013;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
    1. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–585. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosomatic Res. 2002;52:69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3.
    1. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. [In english: The qualitative research Interview]. Lund: Studentlittertur; 2009. Lund: Studentlittertur; 2009.
    1. Holloway I, Galvin K. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
    1. Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res. 2002;12:399–409. doi: 10.1177/104973202129119973.
    1. Bejerholm U, Hansson L, Eklund M. Profiles of occupational engagement in people with schizophrenia (POES): the development of a new instrument based on time-use diaries. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:58–68. doi: 10.1177/030802260606900203.
    1. Håkansson C, Wagman P, Hagell P. Construct validity of a revised version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27:441–449. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1660801.
    1. Eklund M, Erlandsson L-K, Persson D, Hagell P. Rasch analysis of an instrument for measuring occupational value: implications for theory and practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16:118–128. doi: 10.1080/11038120802596253.
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:239–246. doi: 10.1080/165019702760279242.
    1. Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to education, employment situation, health and physical activity. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:84–90. doi: 10.1080/16501970306119.
    1. Löve J, Moore CD, Hensing G. Validation of the Swedish translation of the General Self-Efficacy scale. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1249–1253. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0030-5.
    1. Carlstedt E, Lexell EM, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Iwarsson S. Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in stroke survivors. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:333–337. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000131.
    1. de Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, van Duivenbooden JC. Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med. 2002;52:177–181. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.4.177.
    1. Johansson B, Ronnback L. Evaluation of the mental fatigue scale and its relation to cognitive and emotional functioning after traumatic brain injury or stroke. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;2(01).
    1. Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor (SFS 2003:460). [In english: The swedish law of ethical review of research involving humans]. Stocholm: Regeringskansliet. Avaiable from: .
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79:373.
    1. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). (EU 2016/679). Aviable from: .
    1. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 4. London: Sage Publications; 2015.
    1. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
    1. Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Holmgren K. Fokusgrupper. Fokusgrupper. [In english: Focus groups]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2017.
    1. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounnded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
    1. IBM Corp . IBM Statistical Package for Social Sicence (SPSS), Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. [computer program] Armonk: IBM Corp; 2020.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner