Therapist perceptions of a rehabilitation research study in the intensive care unit: a trinational survey assessing barriers and facilitators to implementing the CYCLE pilot randomized clinical trial

Julie C Reid, Devin S McCaskell, Michelle E Kho, Julie C Reid, Devin S McCaskell, Michelle E Kho

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation interventions, including novel technologies such as in-bed cycling, could reduce critical illness-associated morbidity. Frontline intensive care unit (ICU) therapists often implement these interventions; however, little is known about their perceptions of engaging in clinical research evaluating these technologies.

Objective: To understand frontline therapist perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementing a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of early in-bed cycling with mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU and outcome measures (CYCLE Pilot RCT; NCT02377830).

Methods: We developed a 115-item, self-administered, electronic survey informed by 2 complementary knowledge translation (KT) models: the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) system and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We included demographics and 3 sections: Rehabilitation Practice and Research, Cycling, and Physical Outcome Measures. Each section contained items related to the COM-B system and TDF domains. Item formats included 7-point Likert-type scale questions (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree) and free-text responses. We invited therapists (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and therapy assistants) who participated in the international, multi-center, CYCLE Pilot RCT to complete this cross-sectional survey. We descriptively analyzed results by survey section, COM-B attribute, TDF domain, and individual question within and across sections. We identified barriers based on items with median scores < 4/7.

Results: Our response rate was 85% (45/53). Respondents were from Canada (67%), the USA (21%), and Australia (11%). The majority had a physiotherapy background (87%) and previous research experience (87%). By section, Rehabilitation Practice and Research (85%; 95% confidence interval (CI) [82%, 87%]) was higher than Cycling (77%; 95% CI [73%, 80%]) and Outcome Measures (78%; 95% CI [75%, 82%]). Across the 3 sections, Motivation was lower than Capability and Opportunity. The most common Motivation barrier was the emotion TDF domain, related to the time required to conduct cycling and outcome measures (median [1st, 3rd quartiles] 3/7 [2, 6]).

Conclusions: Frontline ICU therapists had positive perceptions of research engagement. However, we identified barriers related to Motivation, and concerns regarding time to implement the research protocol. Our results can inform specific KT strategies to engage frontline ICU therapists and optimize protocol implementation in critical care rehabilitation research.

Keywords: Knowledge translation; Physical therapists; Questionnaire; Rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThree of the RT300 in-bed cycle ergometers used for the CYCLE Pilot RCT were loaned to Michelle Kho by Restorative Therapies. Restorative Therapies had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

© The Author(s). 2019.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of survey respondents
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of respondents’ median proportional scores for items contributing to Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for a Rehabilitation Practice and Research (n = 45), b Cycling (n = 40), and c Outcome Measures (n = 33). Box plots represent the median score across all respondents’ (horizontal line) and 1st and 3rd quartiles (top and bottom of the box, respectively)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Therapist-reported barriers to participating in conduct of clinical research in the ICU, implementation of early cycling, and conduct of outcome measures
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of respondents’ median proportional scores for items contributing to Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation across the survey. Box plots represent the median score across all respondents (horizontal line) and 1st and 3rd quartiles (top and bottom of the box, respectively)

References

    1. Castro-Avila AC, Serón P, Fan E, Gaete M, Mickan S. Effect of early rehabilitation during intensive care unit stay on functional status systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0130722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130722.
    1. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1293–1304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
    1. Cameron S, Ball I, Cepinskas G, et al. Early mobilization in the critical care unit: a review of adult and pediatric literature. J Crit Care. 2015;30(4):664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.032.
    1. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502–509. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75.
    1. Reid JC, Unger J, McCaskell D, Childerhose L, Zorko DJ, Kho ME. Physical rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit: a scoping review of 117 studies. J Intensive Care. 2018;6(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0349-x.
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
    1. Koo KK, Choong K, Cook DJ, et al. Early mobilization of critically ill adults: a survey of knowledge, perceptions and practices of Canadian physicians and physiotherapists. CMAJ open. 2016;4(3):E448–EE54. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160021.
    1. Dubb Rolf, Nydahl Peter, Hermes Carsten, Schwabbauer Norbert, Toonstra Amy, Parker Ann M., Kaltwasser Arnold, Needham Dale M. Barriers and Strategies for Early Mobilization of Patients in Intensive Care Units. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;13(5):724–730. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-586CME.
    1. Hodgson C, Bellomo R, Berney S, et al. Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: A bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. Critical Care. 2015;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0765-4.
    1. Berney SC, Rose JW, Bernhardt J, Denehy L. Prospective observation of physical activity in critically ill patients who were intubated for more than 48 hours. J Crit Care. 2015;30(4):658–663. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.006.
    1. Wright SE, Thomas K, Watson G, et al. Intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill (EPICC): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2018;73(3):213–221. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209858.
    1. Parry SM, Remedios L, Denehy L, et al. What factors affect implementation of early rehabilitation into intensive care unit practice? A qualitative study with clinicians. J Crit Care. 2017;38:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.005.
    1. Scott SD, Albrecht L, O’Leary K, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-70.
    1. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
    1. Straus SE, Holroyd-Leduc J. Knowledge-to-action cycle. Evid Based Med. 2008;13(4):98–100. doi: 10.1136/ebm.13.4.98-a.
    1. Lang ES, Wyer PC, Haynes RB. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.022.
    1. Francis JJ, O'Connor D, Curran J. Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-35.
    1. Kho ME, Molloy AJ, Clarke FJ, et al. Multicentre pilot randomised clinical trial of early in-bed cycle ergometry with ventilated patients. BMJ Open Respiratory Res. 2019;6(1):e000383. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000383.
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
    1. Burns KE, Duffett M, Kho ME, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ. 2008;179(3):245–252. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080372.
    1. Eysenbach Gunther. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2004;6(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.
    1. Luker JA, Craig LE, Bennett L, et al. Implementing a complex rehabilitation intervention in a stroke trial: a qualitative process evaluation of AVERT. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:52. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0156-9.
    1. Kho ME, Molloy AJ, Clarke FJ, et al. TryCYCLE: a prospective study of the safety and feasibility of early in-bed cycling in mechanically ventilated patients. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0167561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167561.
    1. Research TAAfPO. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 9th edition. AAPOR; 2016.
    1. Connolly B, Allum L, Shaw M, Pattison N, Dark P. Characterising the research profile of the critical care physiotherapy workforce and engagement with critical care research: a UK national survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e020350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020350.
    1. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(5):626–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008.
    1. Nilsagård Ylva, Westerdahl Elisabeth, Forsberg Anette. Engagement in performing clinical physiotherapy research: Perspectives from leaders and physiotherapists. Physiotherapy Research International. 2019;24(2):e1767. doi: 10.1002/pri.1767.
    1. Burtin C, Clerckx B, Robbeets C, et al. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2499–2505. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a38937.
    1. Hickmann CE, Roeseler J, Castanares-Zapatero D, Herrera EI, Mongodin A, Laterre PF. Energy expenditure in the critically ill performing early physical therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(4):548–555. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3218-7.
    1. Parry SM, Berney S, Warrillow S, et al. Functional electrical stimulation with cycling in the critically ill: a pilot case-matched control study. J Crit Care. 2014;29(4):695. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.017.
    1. Coutinho William Maia, Santos Laura Jurema dos, Fernandes João, Vieira Silvia Regina Rios, Forgiarini Junior Luiz Alberto, Dias Alexandre Simões. Efeito agudo da utilização do cicloergômetro durante atendimento fisioterapêutico em pacientes críticos ventilados mecanicamente. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa. 2016;23(3):278–283. doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/15549123032016.
    1. Thelandersson A, Nellgard B, Ricksten SE, Cider A. Effects of early bedside cycle exercise on intracranial pressure and systemic hemodynamics in critically ill patients in a neurointensive care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2016;25(3):434–439. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0278-2.
    1. Machado ADS, Pires-Neto RC, Carvalho MTX, Soares JC, Cardoso DM, Albuquerque IM. Effects that passive cycling exercise have on muscle strength, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay in critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Bras Pneumol. 2017;43(2):134–139. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37562016000000170.
    1. Dantas CM, Silva PF, Siqueira FH, et al. Influence of early mobilization on respiratory and peripheral muscle strength in critically ill patients. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2012;24(2):173–178. doi: 10.1590/S0103-507X2012000200013.
    1. Franca EE, Ribeiro LC, Lamenha GG, et al. Oxidative stress and immune system analysis after cycle ergometer use in critical patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2017;72(3):143–149. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(03)03.
    1. Fossat G, Baudin F, Courtes L, et al. Effect of in-bed leg cycling and electrical stimulation of the quadriceps on global muscle strength in critically ill adults: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2018;320(4):368–378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9592.
    1. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1874–1882. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9.
    1. Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–135. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080234.
    1. Copeland J, Taylor W, Dean S. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1492–1505. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080083.
    1. King G, Wright V, Russell DJ. Understanding paediatric rehabilitation therapists’ lack of use of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25–26):2662–2671. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.582924.
    1. Salbach N, Guilcher S, Jaglal S. Physical therapists’ perceptions and use of standardized assessments of walking ability post-stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:543–549. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0820.
    1. Connolly BA, Jones GD, Curtis AA, et al. Clinical predictive value of manual muscle strength testing during critical illness: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R229. doi: 10.1186/cc13052.
    1. Parry SM, Huang M, Needham DM. Evaluating physical functioning in critical care: considerations for clinical practice and research. Critical Care. 2017;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1827-6.
    1. Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, et al. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored) Phys Ther. 2013;93(12):1636–1645. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120310.
    1. Kleyweg RP, van der Meche FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14(11):1103–1109. doi: 10.1002/mus.880141111.
    1. Stevens Kathleen R., Ferrer Robert L. Real-Time Reporting of Small Operational Failures in Nursing Care. Nursing Research and Practice. 2016;2016:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2016/8416158.
    1. Pronovost PSA, Ravitz A. Improving Hospital Productivity As A Means To Reducing Costs. Health Affairs Blog. 2019. 10.1377/hblog20190321.822588.
    1. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825–ee73. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
    1. Choy LT. The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR J Human Soc Sci. 2014;19(4):99–104. doi: 10.9790/0837-194399104.
    1. Burkell J. The dilemma of survey nonresponse. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2003;25(3):239–263. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00029-X.
    1. Fontela PC, Forgiarini LA, Jr, Friedman G. Clinical attitudes and perceived barriers to early mobilization of critically ill patients in adult intensive care units. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2018;30(2):187–194. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180037.
    1. Jolley SE, Regan-Baggs J, Dickson RP, Hough CL. Medical intensive care unit clinician attitudes and perceived barriers towards early mobilization of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-84.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner