Development of a Head-Mounted Holographic Needle Guidance System for Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Neuraxial Anesthesia: System Development and Observational Evaluation

Jaya Tanwani, Fahad Alam, Clyde Matava, Stephen Choi, Paul McHardy, Oskar Singer, Geraldine Cheong, Julian Wiegelmann, Jaya Tanwani, Fahad Alam, Clyde Matava, Stephen Choi, Paul McHardy, Oskar Singer, Geraldine Cheong, Julian Wiegelmann

Abstract

Background: Neuraxial anesthesia is conventionally performed using a landmark-based technique. Preprocedural ultrasound is often used in challenging clinical scenarios to identify an ideal needle path. The procedure is then carried out by the operator recreating the ultrasound needle path from memory. We suggest that a needle guidance system using the Microsoft HoloLens mixed reality headset, which projects a hologram of the ideal needle path, can assist operators in replicating the correct needle angulation and result in fewer needle passes.

Objective: The objective of the study was to develop software for the mixed reality HoloLens headset, which could be used to augment the performance of neuraxial anesthesia, and establish its face validity in lumbar spine phantom models.

Methods: We developed an ultrasound transducer marker and software for the HoloLens, which registers the position and angulation of the ultrasound transducer during preprocedural scans. Once an image of a clear path from skin to the intrathecal space is acquired, a hologram of the ideal needle path is projected onto the user's visual field. The ultrasound probe is removed while the hologram remains in the correct spatial position to visualize the needle trajectory during the procedure as if conducting real-time ultrasound. User testing was performed using a lumbar spine phantom.

Results: Preliminary work demonstrates that novice (2 anesthesia residents) and experienced operators (5 attending anesthesiologists) can rapidly learn to use mixed reality holograms to perform neuraxial anesthesia on lumbar spine phantoms.

Conclusions: Our study shows promising results for performing neuraxial anesthesia in phantoms using the HoloLens. Although this may have wide-ranging implications for image-guided therapies, further study is required to quantify the accuracy and safety benefit of using holographic guidance.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04028284; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04028284.

Keywords: HoloLens; augmented reality; holograms; mixed reality; neuraxial anesthesia; virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Jaya Tanwani, Fahad Alam, Clyde Matava, Stephen Choi, Paul McHardy, Oskar Singer, Geraldine Cheong, Julian Wiegelmann. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 23.06.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Optical tracking marker attached to a curvilinear probe to enable the HoloLens to detect transducer position.
Figure 2
Figure 2
This figure depicts a HoloLens user's view of aligning a Tuohy needle with a hologram representing an ideal needle path (white line) into an ultrasound phantom. The difference between the Tuohy needle and hologram positions is due to a recording artifact and is not perceived by the user.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The user performs a preprocedural ultrasound, allowing the headset to subsequently generate a spatially stable hologram. The inset shows the operator's mixed reality view displaying a holographic guidance graphic (orange line along the central axis of the ultrasound transducer) with the tracking marker attached to the ultrasound probe.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The user performs a neuraxial technique in standard sterile fashion. The inset shows the hologram projected into the user's visual field to aid replication of the ideal needle path as identified on ultrasound.

References

    1. de Oliveira Filho GR, Gomes HP, da Fonseca MHZ, Hoffman JC, Pederneiras SG, Garcia JHS. Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2002;19(6):447–451. doi: 10.1097/00003643-200206000-00008.
    1. Sprung J, Bourke D, Grass J, Hammel J, Mascha E, Thomas P, Tubin I, McGrady E. Predicting the Difficult Neuraxial Block. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 1999;19(3):203–217. doi: 10.1097/00132582-199912000-00011.
    1. Horlocker TT. Complications of Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. 2000 Jun;18(2):461–485. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(05)70172-3.
    1. Perlas A, Chaparro L, Chin K. Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound for Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(2):251–60. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000184.
    1. Microsoft. [2021-05-20]. .
    1. Hu H, Feng X, Shao Z, Xie M, Xu S, Wu X, Ye Z. Application and Prospect of Mixed Reality Technology in Medical Field. Curr Med Sci. 2019 Mar 13;39(1):1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-1992-8.10.1007/s11596-019-1992-8
    1. Mashari A, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Jeganathan J, Yeh L, Qua Hiansen J, Meineri M, Mahmood F, Matyal R. Low-cost three-dimensional printed phantom for neuraxial anesthesia training: Development and comparison to a commercial model. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0191664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191664. PONE-D-17-24350
    1. Ameri G, Baxter J, Bainbridge D, Peters T, Chen E. Mixed reality ultrasound guidance system: a case study in system development and a cautionary tale. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 May;13(4):495–505. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1665-7.10.1007/s11548-017-1665-7
    1. Faiella E, Frauenfelder G, Santucci D, Luppi G, Schena E, Beomonte Zobel B, Grasso R. Percutaneous low-dose CT-guided lung biopsy with an augmented reality navigation system: validation of the technique on 496 suspected lesions. Clin Imaging. 2018;49:101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.11.013.S0899-7071(17)30244-9
    1. Marker D, U Thainual P, Ungi T, Flammang AJ, Fichtinger G, Iordachita II, Carrino JA, Fritz J. 1.5 T augmented reality navigated interventional MRI: paravertebral sympathetic plexus injections. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23(3):227–232. doi: 10.5152/dir.2017.16323.
    1. Al-Deen Ashab H, Lessoway V, Khallaghi S, Cheng A, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P. An Augmented Reality System for Epidural Anesthesia (AREA): Prepuncture Identification of Vertebrae. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Sep;60(9):2636–2644. doi: 10.1109/tbme.2013.2262279.
    1. Condino S, Carbone M, Piazza R, Ferrari M, Ferrari V. Perceptual Limits of Optical See-Through Visors for Augmented Reality Guidance of Manual Tasks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Feb;67(2):411–419. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2914517.
    1. Kobayashi L, Zhang X, Collins S, Karim N, Merck D. Exploratory Application of Augmented Reality/Mixed Reality Devices for Acute Care Procedure Training. West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 18;19(1):158–164. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.35026. wjem-19-158

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner